ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Thanks for the heads up, but for next time it would be helpful if you would give us a clue what the story is about in your post, or better yet in your thread title.
For other readers, it's about whether the Pats free agency strategy is different this year than it has been in the past.
__________________ It's so simple, even a Jets fan could do it.ä To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Thanks for the heads up, but for next time it would be helpful if you would give us a clue what the story is about in your post, or better yet in your thread title.
For other readers, it's about whether the Pats free agency strategy is different this year than it has been in the past.
Did we get up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? The story was only one click away. Also, maybe BrianPat was pressed for time.
Did we get up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? The story was only one click away. Also, maybe BrianPat was pressed for time.
No, we didn't get up on the wrong side of bed this morning! I was not coming from a cranky place, I was just trying to give some helpful advice to a new poster and at the same time make this a better board.
Man, you have to be careful the way you word things around here!
__________________ It's so simple, even a Jets fan could do it.ä To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Thank you for the article .
I loved the following quote from Belichick
Quote:
“In my mind, it’s not a philosophical thing to do or not do,” Belichick said Saturday, in a telephone interview before the Stallworth deal was done. “Just because something wasn’t done in another year doesn’t mean that if the opportunity had been there it wouldn’t have been done. In some years, we didn’t have much cap space. There was no money to spend. You work within the constraints you have. To me, we’re taking the same approach to the season that we have every season: do what you think is best.”
I wish the mediots*coughFelgerWEEIBorgescough* will understand this, the Pats deal with each year according to the circumstances happening, they do have a philosophy, and that's not to be rigid with their philosophy.
Location: Finnair flight AY 839 from Helsinki to London
Posts: 1,324
Re: Interesting story from the NY Times
I think all in all this is a pretty fair-minded report. Whichever spin the team puts on it, the frenetic activity at the beginning of FA has been uncharacteristic of the way the Patriots have approached it in recent years, and is therefore worthy of analysis.
Judy Battista seems to "get" most of the points - there's a ton more money around under the new CBA, the Pats are significantly under the cap and therefore in a position to compete strongly, two of our signings (Morris and Brady) are direct replacements for more expensive incumbents; it's really only the Thomas deal that is somewhat out of character.
From my point of view, I subscribe, at least partly, to the theory that they were stung hugely by the second half collapse against the Colts and determined to build the team up to mitigate against the chance of a recurrrence. But they are always determined to put the best possible team on the field and constrcut the best possible roster.
It is the change in circumstances and the availability of the type of talent that Thomas represents that has produced a change in tactics.
The STRATEGY is the same - build the team up in the best way possible using all resources, draft, trade and FA - it is merely the TACTICS that are different this year.
There's that famous quote from BB or SP or whoever about being the best at no 1 on the roster, the best at 25 and the best at 53. That means they understand full well that occasionally you have to pony up at the top end as well as finding a Reche Caldwell or a Ray Mickens or whoever.
So this year is no different. They've looked after a top 10 spot with Thomas (top three spot probably) and possibly Stallworth, top 25 spots with Kyle Brady, Sammy Morris and Wes Welker. The 30s, 40s and 50s are already pretty well sorted.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
For those who know the Pats or do some research it obvious that NOTHING has changed. The Pats never were cheap, the were financially responsible and level headed. BB always went after the guy he wanted, he gets called cheap because he won't overpay for the next best thing if he can't get what he wants.
He wanted Colvin, he paid him. He wanted Mason, he offered more than any other team. He wanted Graham and Warren so he moved up to get them. This year there are simply more guys that he wants who are available. And don't forget the competitive (admittedly not bank breaking but competitive) offers to keep Branch, Adam V and Law.
Interesting story from the NY Times
I was not coming from a cranky place, I was just trying to give some helpful advice to a new poster and at the same time make this a better board.
Linear Mode
