ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsully
We'll if I was a betting man.> I would put money that he is starting week 1. But I think that could quickly change, especially if they draft a Safety early..
Wilsons play has gone down hill ever since the last SB.. Maybe the wear and tear of playing physical over the middle is to much for him.
Could he switch back to corner.. Who really knows.. BB might not even know.. But one thing is for sure... The future is else where for our safety spot.. EW is not the answer long term..
Cousin,
I agree with everything you have said. Wilson has been digressing for the last couple of years even before the injuries. When Harrison went down, instead of taking over the leadership of the DB's, he looked lost.
One way or the other we have to prepare for LWR (life without Rodney) and get someone to step in right now and learn while Harrison can show him the ropes. Wilson cannot do that.
Hawkins was a stop gap.
Seems that Landry is the best fit to draft, but won't be there. The word on Nelson is that he is not that good of tackler and Merriweather is too small for an NFL safety. Hell, Sanders is 5' 10" and 205, and he was too short and got pushed around.
Oh well. You can say one thing about Sanders, he might have been too short, couldn't cover my mother-in-law (see Colts game) and got moved easily.....But he wasn't that good either!
The day one draft guy I like is this kid from Utah who can play S, CB, LB, RB, and holder. Eric Weddle is a perfect BB sort who might last until the third round or Sabby Piscatelli of Oregon St. who is a monster with speed who will last until then as well.
Idea! Wilson is in his last year of contract and the Bears need a safety. The could also use a good DE backup like say....Marquis Hill. What do you think about this deal. Hill, Wilson and one of our #1's for Briggs and their early #2 (37?)they got from swapping with the J...E...T...S!
I think Briggs could play ILB, he' young and what a cast around him. Why wouldn't he want to play with this D?
DW Toys
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan55
im not so sure
hawkins was starting to get favored over geno before he even got hurt
and hawk wasnt exactly a ball hawk
if we draft a safety high, i wouldnt be all that surprised to see him the starter (reggie nelson, please oh please oh please), as geno started at safety his rookie yr
That is absolutely untrue. Geno was always the starter when healthy.
IMO, unless we draft an elite safety high (perhaps in spite of, depending on the learning curve), Geno will start next season. He's a good player when he doesn't have a revolving door next to him.
At SS, Rodney's near the end. I could see him in on running downs but I also see Sanders expanding his PT. Contrary to DWToys' post, Sanders played quite well last year (and would be even better with a better FS).
Last edited by JackBauer; 03-13-2007 at 01:23 PM..
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Seemed to me that Geno was finding his form again just before he went down for the year. Also if I remember rightly, due to Rodney not being 100% Geno was being asked to play closer to the LOS than in previous years, and was looking good doing it.
Of all the non-Rodney Harrison options at safety, Wilson seems to me to be the only one who is equally as effective vs both the run and the pass. That might give him a slight edge,
Last edited by Lampshade; 03-13-2007 at 01:25 PM..
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
I was with you until you cooked up that weird trade for Briggs. It won't work because of the $$$. Briggs wants to get PAID and we won't be able to give Briggs his RESPECT (read CASH) and sign our rookies at the same time. Plus on top of that you want to convert him into an ILB when Briggs has made it clear he prefers to be an OLB in a 4-3 system not a 3-4, no less an ILB.
I think Wilson will be a starting safety in 2007 but he can be replaced and better not get complacent about his job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DW Toys
Cousin,
I agree with everything you have said. Wilson has been digressing for the last couple of years even before the injuries. When Harrison went down, instead of taking over the leadership of the DB's, he looked lost.
One way or the other we have to prepare for LWR (life without Rodney) and get someone to step in right now and learn while Harrison can show him the ropes. Wilson cannot do that.
Hawkins was a stop gap.
Seems that Landry is the best fit to draft, but won't be there. The word on Nelson is that he is not that good of tackler and Merriweather is too small for an NFL safety. Hell, Sanders is 5' 10" and 205, and he was too short and got pushed around.
Oh well. You can say one thing about Sanders, he might have been too short, couldn't cover my mother-in-law (see Colts game) and got moved easily.....But he wasn't that good either!
The day one draft guy I like is this kid from Utah who can play S, CB, LB, RB, and holder. Eric Weddle is a perfect BB sort who might last until the third round or Sabby Piscatelli of Oregon St. who is a monster with speed who will last until then as well.
Idea! Wilson is in his last year of contract and the Bears need a safety. The could also use a good DE backup like say....Marquis Hill. What do you think about this deal. Hill, Wilson and one of our #1's for Briggs and their early #2 (37?)they got from swapping with the J...E...T...S!
I think Briggs could play ILB, he' young and what a cast around him. Why wouldn't he want to play with this D?
DW Toys
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClevTrev
Wilson could start as a FS, SS, or CB. As others have pointed out, Safety is an extremely important position for the Pats to fill. The question marks surrounding Wilson being out last season and Harrison's age, there is a need for a turnover now or within the next season with impending free agency. Obtaining an immediate contributor by drafting a strong successor is very important considering the choices the team has in the upcoming draft.
Wilson has proven that he can't play SS. See the Hawkins signing 2005.
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait.... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DW Toys
Cousin,
I agree with everything you have said. Wilson has been digressing for the last couple of years even before the injuries. When Harrison went down, instead of taking over the leadership of the DB's, he looked lost.
One way or the other we have to prepare for LWR (life without Rodney) and get someone to step in right now and learn while Harrison can show him the ropes. Wilson cannot do that.
Hawkins was a stop gap.
Seems that Landry is the best fit to draft, but won't be there. The word on Nelson is that he is not that good of tackler and Merriweather is too small for an NFL safety. Hell, Sanders is 5' 10" and 205, and he was too short and got pushed around.
Oh well. You can say one thing about Sanders, he might have been too short, couldn't cover my mother-in-law (see Colts game) and got moved easily.....But he wasn't that good either!
The day one draft guy I like is this kid from Utah who can play S, CB, LB, RB, and holder. Eric Weddle is a perfect BB sort who might last until the third round or Sabby Piscatelli of Oregon St. who is a monster with speed who will last until then as well.
Idea! Wilson is in his last year of contract and the Bears need a safety. The could also use a good DE backup like say....Marquis Hill. What do you think about this deal. Hill, Wilson and one of our #1's for Briggs and their early #2 (37?)they got from swapping with the J...E...T...S!
I think Briggs could play ILB, he' young and what a cast around him. Why wouldn't he want to play with this D?
DW Toys
I think you have several things quite wrong. We have eight or nine Safeties on the roster and can only keep five at most. Geno, when he was healthy, was a near pro bowl FS. When Rodney went down in 2005 there was nobody except an immature rookie to play SS, and the Pats went through a succession of one week failures playing alongside Geno. When Hawkins showed up, Geno got hurt.
IMHO the Pats have a superb secondary composed of a Pro bowler with Asante, a very good young corner in Hobbs, and proven starters in Gay and Scott for depth at CB. Their Safeties are Wilson and a now-experienced Sanders, with Rodney and Hawkins and Gay for depth, and Baker, Andrews, Scott, and Mitchell for even more depth.
With regard to Lance Briggs, he has said he doesn't fit in a 3-4 and he ought to know. He complains that he plays second fiddle to Urlacher at LB in Chicago. How would he like to play second, third, fourth, or maybe fifth fiddle to Bruschi, Vrabel, AD, and/or Colvin? That's why it would never happen !
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Much like the WR position I look for the Pats to bring in competition for the FS spot, be it the draft, FA, or both.
Wilson hasn't played good FS in two years and whenever he gets matched up one on one he gets beat so unless things change he's not moving to CB either. He's a UFA after this year so maybe he'll be more motivated and will put up a good year but if he's going to have to earn it.
If Milloy had to earn every cent Wilson will be held accountable and BB will bring in guys to push him and if need be push him out.
__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."
There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Will Eugene Wilson be a starting safety in Week 1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan
I think you have several things quite wrong. We have eight or nine Safeties on the roster and can only keep five at most. Geno, when he was healthy, was a near pro bowl FS. When Rodney went down in 2005 there was nobody except an immature rookie to play SS, and the Pats went through a succession of one week failures playing alongside Geno. When Hawkins showed up, Geno got hurt.
IMHO the Pats have a superb secondary composed of a Pro bowler with Asante, a very good young corner in Hobbs, and proven starters in Gay and Scott for depth at CB. Their Safeties are Wilson and a now-experienced Sanders, with Rodney and Hawkins and Gay for depth, and Baker, Andrews, Scott, and Mitchell for even more depth.
With regard to Lance Briggs, he has said he doesn't fit in a 3-4 and he ought to know. He complains that he plays second fiddle to Urlacher at LB in Chicago. How would he like to play second, third, fourth, or maybe fifth fiddle to Bruschi, Vrabel, AD, and/or Colvin? That's why it would never happen !
Cousin,
The Briggs thing was just a "Would-ya-if-I". If you read anything about the guy, he wants to be "THE GUY". It's how you read it I guess. You can read it as #1 it's "me before team" , or #2 he is asking the team to "ride his shoulders", and with the case of the Bears, Urlacher already has that job. I know it has been said he prefers a 4-3 D, but given the fact that he could be the pivot guy for many years to come if he agrees to play MLB, especially when Teddy retires, I say he is willing to accept that. We also know the Bears are looking for a safety and some DL help and they lost a couple of guys to FA. But it just doesn't end there.
Even if a deal could be worked, just how much money would this dude want. I know it's all a mute point, but just a fun thought to stick him in the middle next to Teddy and a rotation outside of AT, Colvin and Vrabel. Briggs ceratinly has the size.
I just threw a Wilson trade out there to get something back for he and Hill because, no he dosen't start as I think Wilson is ripe to get beat out by a talented rookie if we draft one AND he is in the last year of his contract. He'll cost a fortune in 2008. Who would you rather have? Briggs or a tarnished Wilson? He has been going backwards IMO.
I think the corners were respectable somewhat but certainly not perfect. I think Hobbs is a better nickle back. Another corner is needed and surely another safety.