ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
(At least in the sense that Manning is and probably will be for another 5 years or so among the best at QB)
Yup, and he ain't gonna play for free (even though he should...) after 2007 just because they gave him a lot of bonus money that is just a fleeting memory where Tom Condon is concerned...
And if the Colts don't win next Sunday it may make it tough to expand their cash flow even with a new luxury box filled taxpayer funded stadium coming on line in 2008. He's got to sell those boxes in 2007, which could be a rough year for the Colts win or lose looking at how all but one recent Superbowl participant has fared in the aftermath of their appearance...
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Yup, and he ain't gonna play for free (even though he should...) after 2007 just because they gave him a lot of bonus money that is just a fleeting memory where Tom Condon is concerned...
And if the Colts don't win next Sunday it may make it tough to expand their cash flow even with a new luxury box filled taxpayer funded stadium coming on line in 2008. He's got to sell those boxes in 2007, which could be a rough year for the Colts win or lose looking at how all but one recent Superbowl participant has fared in the aftermath of their appearance...
If the Colts lose, everything goes back to where it was, especially if the Pats defeat the Colts in their matchup next year.
(At least in the sense that Manning is and probably will be for another 5 years or so among the best at QB)
IMO, Manning is among the best at QB today. And going into 2007 he will be widely considered (maybe not on this board) to be among the best at his position, the most important position.
Let me be perfectly clear.
As soon as Manning stops one of the top players at his position, the days of his seeing Top 5 money will soon end. Do I know when Manning will stop being among the best at his position??No. Does anyone on this board know??? No. Do I think that it is likely that Manning will remain among the best at his position for a couple more years??
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
If the Colts lose, everything goes back to where it was, especially if the Pats defeat the Colts in their matchup next year.
You and MLR are using the word "if" a lot. A certain someone (someone that I respect greatly) wrote on this board on 12/19/2006 "If you take away the first floor of a building, you no longer have a building any more.
On a serious note, IMO, once PM is no longer a Top 5 player, then the Colts will no longer be a serious SB contender. Hall of Fame quarterbacks do not come by that often. Please note that I also think that once Brady is no longer a Top 5 player, then the Pats will no longer be a serious SB contender.
I have been saying for years now that I have yet to see a team get into cap trouble paying Top 5 players Top 5 money. Teams get into trouble when they overpay for players. Is Manning worth $11 million in new money in 2007??I say yes. Is Harrison worth $4 million in new money in 2007?? IMO, that is a bargain price for him.
__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.
You and MLR are using the word "if" a lot. A certain someone (someone that I respect greatly) wrote on this board on 12/19/2006 "If you take away the first floor of a building, you no longer have a building any more.
Yes, yes, a certain someone...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel
On a serious note, IMO, once PM is no longer a Top 5 player, then the Colts will no longer be a serious SB contender. Hall of Fame quarterbacks do not come by that often. Please note that I also think that once Brady is no longer a Top 5 player, then the Pats will no longer be a serious SB contender.
I agree with the first point, but not the second.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel
I have been saying for years now that I have yet to see a team get into cap trouble paying Top 5 players Top 5 money. Teams get into trouble when they overpay for players. Is Manning worth $11 million in new money in 2007??I say yes. Is Harrison worth $4 million in new money in 2007?? IMO, that is a bargain price for him.
I'll still stick with the Pats' philosophy that brought the Lombardi home in 2001.
LG Ryan Lilja
RG Jake Scott
TE Ben Utecht
RDE Dwight Freeney
SLB Rob Morris
WLB Cato June
LCB Nick Harper
RCB Jason David
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel
Lilja, David and Scott are RFAs, not UFAs.
Utecht does not start at TE. Dallas Clark does.
The Colts are UNDER the cap by those numbers by $4.9 million. They can easily free up another $15 million by redoing the deals of Manning, Glenn,McFarland and Mathis. If the Colts work out deal with Simon, they may be able to get out of his deal which would free up close to another $7 million.
Yeah, the Colts are in bad shape only if you believe that Manning will turn 33 next year and that Dallas Clark does not start for the Colts.
Before everyone says that it is bad to push money into the future, the Pats have been doing it every year since BB and Pioli have arrived in Foxboro. In 2006 they pushed money into the future with Dillon and Seymour.
Oh, my. The Colts may have to cut players or redo deals. Gee, every team cuts players or redoes player's deals each and every year. I finally get it -When the Patriots cuts a player or redoes a player's deal, it is a good salary cap practice. When the Colts does the same thing, it means salary cap hell for the Colts.
I think the Colts have shown a history of letting the LBs walk. Washington, Triplet, Thorton, Petersen being the big names. I think based on history we can assume June and Morris would be the players they would not give the big contact too. If they can sign them for a reasonable price they would do so. They probably view this position much like the Pats do the O-line where they figure they can get value in the draft and coach the players up to fit the system really quickly. If they can sign players for a value like the Pats did with Light, Koppen, or Neil then great, if they want big money like Woody or above value like Ashworth or Andruzzi then bye-bye.
There are a lot of 3-4 LBs to be found in the later rounds compared to other positions and they can troll the FA market and get a player who's 95% of the skill at 50% the cost. So it makes sense for them.
So they give RFA contracts to Lilja, David and Scott that's 3M or so and their rookies is 1.5M. So that's basically their cap space as it stands.
They re-do some deals for 10M and get deals done with Freeney and Harper that accounts for another 7M and they get Utecht done for another 1M. Leaving them 2M, maybe more depending on what they can get done.
June and Morris walk.
They're still a playoff team, but unless they hit on the draft with immediate impact players, and they have no second round pick, they are certainly a weaker team.
They have also put more debt on the back end. The good news for them is the cap is going up the next three years by a good percentage. So unlike the Titans who had to blow it up they will be able to maintain but can they get better?
It will be interesting to watch.
__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."
There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I feel exactly as if I've been listening to a group of physicists discussing string theory. I have great respect for all of you and I thank you for illuminating an aspect of professional football about which the average fan, even the fairly obsessive fan (like me) understands only to the point that he knows he doesn't understand it. It's discussions like this that lift PatsFans.com into the stratosphere.
I think the Colts have shown a history of letting the LBs walk. Washington, Triplet, Thorton, Petersen being the big names. I think based on history we can assume June and Morris would be the players they would not give the big contact too. If they can sign them for a reasonable price they would do so. They probably view this position much like the Pats do the O-line where they figure they can get value in the draft and coach the players up to fit the system really quickly. If they can sign players for a value like the Pats did with Light, Koppen, or Neil then great, if they want big money like Woody or above value like Ashworth or Andruzzi then bye-bye.
There are a lot of 3-4 LBs to be found in the later rounds compared to other positions and they can troll the FA market and get a player who's 95% of the skill at 50% the cost. So it makes sense for them.
So they give RFA contracts to Lilja, David and Scott that's 3M or so and their rookies is 1.5M. So that's basically their cap space as it stands.
They re-do some deals for 10M and get deals done with Freeney and Harper that accounts for another 7M and they get Utecht done for another 1M. Leaving them 2M, maybe more depending on what they can get done.
June and Morris walk.
They're still a playoff team, but unless they hit on the draft with immediate impact players, and they have no second round pick, they are certainly a weaker team.
They have also put more debt on the back end. The good news for them is the cap is going up the next three years by a good percentage. So unlike the Titans who had to blow it up they will be able to maintain but can they get better?
__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."
There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.