Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2010, 09:33 AM   #11
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks View Post
McKenzie is PSquad eligible.
McKenzie won't make it through Waivers to get to the PS. Denver would snatch him in a heartbeat.
DaBruinz is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-23-2010, 09:39 AM   #12
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
McKenzie won't make it through Waivers to get to the PS. Denver would snatch him in a heartbeat.
Why Denver? Why would they snatch a guy who is still adapting to playing inside a 3-4?
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 09:41 AM   #13
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 929
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Reiss is a good reporter, so I wouldnt take any shots at him needlessly. But I think one of the problems with alot of reporting and reporters in general when it comes to actually analyzing positions, depth, performance, etc is that they never actually played any football. You can watch football all you want. You can cover it for years. But if youve never actually played it on any level, your expertise will always be somewhat limited. Not to say youre not qualified to write and report and entertain and sell stories, but your analysis as a reporter with zero actual experience should just be read with some degree of perspective. Having said all that, he's the best we've got on the Pats, and I appreciate pretty much all the stuff he writes.

Last edited by RussFrancis; 08-23-2010 at 09:42 AM..
RussFrancis is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 09:45 AM   #14
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,297
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
I made it a point to watch McKenzie during the 2 pre-season games and I have to say I was somewhat disappointed. I'm not sure where his fire was, but he didn't seem to me to have it like he did during the practices.

But, I will say this. It's still early yet and there is plenty of improvement for this kid to make and I believe we'll be watching him the next few years.
I watched him rather closely as well - I wouldn't say I was disappointed, necessarily. He was rather inconsistent. He'd get off blocks on one play and get swallowed up on the next. But you can say that about anybody, really.

Still, my point wasn't necessarily that McKenzie should or should not make the team. He may be a bubble guy, like Reiss suggests, but his reasoning is terribly flawed. McKenzie is not going to be on the field at the same time as Spikes, ever - they both play SILB, and neither really has the speed to backup Mayo at WILB. So to draw a conclusion from the fact that Alexander or Fletcher replaces Mayo when the 1's leave, and tie that conclusion to McKenzie, it's just asinine and really misleading to his blog readers.

Last edited by BradyManny; 08-23-2010 at 09:47 AM..
BradyManny is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 09:48 AM   #15
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,622
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

A) McKenzie is making the team
B) What order the 3rd or 4th LB enters a preseason game has little relevance
C) Backup ILBs need to play both side. LILB and RILB...since we dont flip the LB there is no such position in our defense as SILB or WILB
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:09 AM   #16
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 114
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
A) McKenzie is making the team
B) What order the 3rd or 4th LB enters a preseason game has little relevance
C) Backup ILBs need to play both side. LILB and RILB...since we dont flip the LB there is no such position in our defense as SILB or WILB
I know this part has been historically true, but my eyes (and others have reported seeing the same thing), tell me that Spikes and Mayo have been swapping sides fairly often presnap. Of course without knowledge of the defensive calls we have no idea why, but they have been doing it.

SSDD
SEPatsFan is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:21 AM   #17
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEPatsFan View Post
I know this part has been historically true, but my eyes (and others have reported seeing the same thing), tell me that Spikes and Mayo have been swapping sides fairly often presnap. Of course without knowledge of the defensive calls we have no idea why, but they have been doing it.

SSDD
They've absolutely been flipping sides. Spikes has been playing the strong side next to Mayo. In the Atlanta game, you can even see them switching sides as the TE goes in motion.

With regard to McKenzie, I actually think he's been fine in the first 2 games. Fletcher was clearly much worse in the 1st game and Alexander is what he is. The one part of McKenzie's game I've been disappointed with is his lack of participation on ST. If he was playing ST with the first unit, I'd say he's a lock for a roster spot. I would watch that more so that when he comes in to play LB to gauge his roster status.
bucky is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:23 AM   #18
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,297
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
A) McKenzie is making the team
B) What order the 3rd or 4th LB enters a preseason game has little relevance
C) Backup ILBs need to play both side. LILB and RILB...since we dont flip the LB there is no such position in our defense as SILB or WILB
I'd strongly object to point C since I do see Mayo and Spikes switch sides depending upon where the strongside of the defense is. I'm rather certain we have a SILB and WILB, we've heard Belichick talk about these guys in terms of strongside and weakside as it is, so if he makes the distinction, we should, too.

Not to mention its a moot point anyway - you don't want two slower, bigger, run-stuffing ILBs on the field at the same time in the 3-4 anyway. McKenzie backups Spikes; Alexander backs up Mayo - whether you call them LILB, SILB, or whatever, it's clear that the Patriots coaching staff are making a distinction between those two positions. And part of that distinction means McKenzie backs up Spikes.

We clearly ask for two distinct ILB skillsets - quicker, lighter, faster & bigger, stouter, stronger. We're lucky Jerod Mayo is a freak and fits both, but McKenzie does not, so he's only lining up in one of the spots.

Last edited by BradyManny; 08-23-2010 at 10:25 AM..
BradyManny is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:27 AM   #19
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEPatsFan View Post
I know this part has been historically true, but my eyes (and others have reported seeing the same thing), tell me that Spikes and Mayo have been swapping sides fairly often presnap. Of course without knowledge of the defensive calls we have no idea why, but they have been doing it.

SSDD
NE ILBs flipped sides all the time since one backer will usually have a tendency to line up on one side over the other. What AJ is referring to is the requirement for them to be formation ambidextrous since it may not be practical to flip around again once the offense starts motioning and shifting to create mismatches. Mayo, Guyton, Spikes, McKenzie, Alexander, Fletcher, and Williams all are trained to play both sides regardless of any personal tendencies to play one better than the other.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:27 AM   #20
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,511
Default Re: Mike Reiss off the mark on McKenzie analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
They've absolutely been flipping sides. Spikes has been playing the strong side next to Mayo. In the Atlanta game, you can even see them switching sides as the TE goes in motion.

With regard to McKenzie, I actually think he's been fine in the first 2 games. Fletcher was clearly much worse in the 1st game and Alexander is what he is. The one part of McKenzie's game I've been disappointed with is his lack of participation on ST. If he was playing ST with the first unit, I'd say he's a lock for a roster spot. I would watch that more so that when he comes in to play LB to gauge his roster status.
Fletcher could also add value as a nickel pass rusher. Organized chaos.
crowell33 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reiss: McKenzie to participate fully in offseason activities pats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 81 02-26-2010 04:59 PM
Big props to Mike McKenzie PatsSox363804 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 4 12-01-2009 08:40 AM
OT: Saints to sign CB Mike McKenzie R_T26 NFL Football Forum 3 11-23-2009 01:56 PM
Mike Reiss - Analysis: D-Line Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 2 12-09-2005 10:33 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563