Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2006, 07:02 PM   #1
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 330
Default Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

He is one of only 2 2006 top 10 WR picks to have scored a TD, he is third in rcv yds. and third in yards per catch. Maybe we are judging this kid too harshly. Here are the sad looking stats for the first 10 WR's taken in the 2006 draft.

1) Holmes, Steelers- 4 games 7 catches 73 yards 10.4 ypc and 0 touchdowns
2) Jackson, Patriots- 3 games 4 catches 51 yards 12.8 ypc and 1 touchdown
3) Moss, NY Giants- 1 game-- 1 catch for 4 yds - 4.0 ypc and 0 touchdowns
4) Jennings, Packers- 5 games 20 catches 364 yds 18.2 ypc and 3 TD's-----
5) Wilson, Browns-- 1 game no catches, no yds no touchdowns------------
6) Hagen, Dolphins- 5 games, 2 catches 31 yds. 15.5 ypc and 0 touchdowns
7) Stovall, Tampa Bay- 1 game and 0 catches 0 yds and 0 touchdowns------
8) Reid, Steelers-- 1 game with 0 catches 0 yds and 0 touchdowns----------
9) Rogers, Packers- Did not make the team 104th player selected------------
10) Avant, Eagles--3 games, 0 catches, 0 yds, 0 Touchdowns--------------
Looks like the front office missed on Greg Jennings he was picked 16 spots after Chad Jackson, he is having a great rookie season so far. All in all I think we might have been vastly overestimating the impact Jackson would have as a rookie. Let's get Porter from the Raiders now.
__________________
Jim Colclough was the man.
RIP#40 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-09-2006, 07:10 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,714
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

But has he mastered a crossing route?
__________________
Felger started his question, "Correct me if I'm wrong," BB quickly interjected, "I can't wait--"


``The officials now are evaluating the players and their performance, I mean, that's great,'' Belichick deadpanned. ``I can't say how much that means to me, really.''
jczxohn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 07:42 PM   #3
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,391
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

I'm sure the fans who expected Jackson to come in and have an immediate impact, firmly establishing himself as the #1 or #2 WR are likely disappointed.

Unreasonable expectations have a way of doing that to you.

Those fans who recognize that even Hall of Fame WRs needed a season to establish themselves aren't even close to bemoaning this draft pick yet.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 07:44 PM   #4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIP#40
Looks like the front office missed on Greg Jennings he was picked 16 spots after Chad Jackson, he is having a great rookie season so far. All in all I think we might have been vastly overestimating the impact Jackson would have as a rookie. Let's get Porter from the Raiders now.
It's way, WAY too early to say this re Jennings, Jackson AND Porter, you ridiculous newbie SPAZ.
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 07:56 PM   #5
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 330
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEM
I think he will be a great WR...and soon....
Will there be stops at adequate and good first, or will he go directly to great?
__________________
Jim Colclough was the man.
RIP#40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 08:08 PM   #6
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 330
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsox23
It's way, WAY too early to say this re Jennings, Jackson AND Porter, you ridiculous newbie SPAZ.
Too early to say what? That Jennings is having a great rookie year so far? Too early to say that the Pats should go after Porter now? Or too early to say that Jackson will not be our #1 this season?
__________________
Jim Colclough was the man.
RIP#40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 08:16 PM   #7
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 929
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

I sincerely doubt there is a single GM in the NFL that would accept Steve Smith for CJ right now, especially those fighting for their job.

Chad Jackson will eventually become the exciting pass catcher that we have yet to see as Patriots fans. It will occur when Brady is actually in his prime, say, 2007, 2008, 2009. We will see things that have never been seen before, like long bombs, screen passes going for 40 yards, slants through the middle for first downs and more.

Come back and read this in 2008.
zarakotas5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 08:17 PM   #8
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
TomBrady'sGoat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,769
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

I think the NFL made two big mistakes when they shortened the season to 5 games and dictated that rookie contracts be only for one year.
TomBrady'sGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 08:20 PM   #9
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,345
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIP#40
Looks like the front office missed on Greg Jennings he was picked 16 spots after Chad Jackson, he is having a great rookie season so far. All in all I think we might have been vastly overestimating the impact Jackson would have as a rookie. Let's get Porter from the Raiders now.



How can you say that the front office "missed" on Greg Jennings after 5 darn games in which Jackson has been hindered by injury. Get some darn perspective. Terry Glenn had a huge rookie season, Steve Smith didnt, Chad Johnson didn't. Are you saying that the Bengals missed out on Terry Glenn?

Take a step back and breathe for a second. Please. I"m beginning to get tired of Chad Jackson complains.

Reality Check people: CJ is a ROOKIE. Hopefully he'll be able to adjust well and quickly to our offense. Hopefully he'll be able to learn the ropes fast and be able to take a leading role in our passing offense. But don't be surprised if he doesn't. Most rookies don't.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The Colts shock and awe offense ... was shockingly awful." - quote from NFL Game Of The Week (2005 div vs Indy)
skri65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 08:24 PM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 
PonyExpress's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,646
Default Re: Chad Jackson compared to 1st 10 2006 WR draft picks

Quote:
Originally Posted by RIP#40
Too early to say what? That Jennings is having a great rookie year so far? Too early to say that the Pats should go after Porter now? Or too early to say that Jackson will not be our #1 this season?
Many people were high on Jennings at draft time. However, Jennings is 5'11 195 with average speed, and I believe the Pats are gambling that CJ can be a special, game-breaking player. Jennings is at least 2 years older than Jackson and played his full 4 years of college. Everyone knew he was more of a finished product. Too early to make judgments.
PonyExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC