Re: Kickoff Special Team - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2006, 11:04 AM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Minuteman country
Posts: 1,094
Send a message via AIM to arrellbee
Default Re: Kickoff Special Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by arrellbee
A couple things I would be fascinated to have some insight into.

What is Belichick's tradeoff valuation between a kickoff that goes into the end zone versus a longer hang time ? A corollary to that would be whether in preseason he is asking Gostkowski to kick shorter so as to be able to get a chance to evaluate kick coverage better ? Those questions will probably be answered when we get to the regular season and see what Gostkowski does.

The second question is, what is Belichick's tradeoff valuation between a higher odds of tackling a returner inside the 30 yard line versus trying to stop him inside the 20 but with a higher risk of a long return ?

At the moment, my perception (no tape review or stats to add any credibility) is that they are averaging kick returners getting to the 25 yard line. Geeesh. I just went ahead and checked the Washington game and they averaged return run yardage average of 20.7. That would have put the Patriots in the top 5 best compared to last year in terms of limiting kickoff returns.

Washington's average return was to the 25.17 yard line. The best last year (Atlanta) average yardage allowed was to the 25.8, so that would have made Pats number one in limiting opponents kickoff starting position.
Felger had interesting comments on this same topic of length versus hang-time:

Quote:
Boston Herald:
http://patriots.bostonherald.com/pat...82&format=text

" While rookie kicker Stephen Gostkowski made a nice tackle on a second-quarter return, his kickoffs were noticeably short. Gostkowski had eight kickoffs and not one reached the end zone. The closest he got was the 2-yard line. The rest landed between the 4 and 10.

Belichick said a kickoff that reaches the end zone losses effectiveness if it doesn’t have the proper hang time. For example, a kick that has two-tenths of a second more hang time is better off coming down on the 2 than a kick that goes to the goal line and doesn’t have that hang time.

As a result, Gostkowski may not have graded out as poorly as it looked to the naked eye. "
This also may have been one of the factors in the tradeoff of keeping Gostkowski versus Gramatica. Didn't see any media comments and unless we used our own stop watch, it wouldn't have been noticeable in preseason kickoffs by the two.
arrellbee is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-31-2006, 11:57 AM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,688
My Mood: Sad
Default Re: Kickoff Special Team

They looked short to me but the coverage was ok. The return game looks a little lack luster, Maroney had a nice run but I would rather see someone else in that role. It looks like he will get a 50/50 split of the carries to start the year, a number that will increase as the season goes along.

Solution - 1) Sign Branch 2) Look for a veteran returner, ideally a WR but a CB would be ok. Names Rossum (ATL), Eddie Drummond (DET)
cstjohn17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 01:50 PM   #3
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 358
Default Re: Kickoff Special Team

I can't find it now, but I read an article last year in which BB quoted stats on how an opponent's starting position translated to points. Wish I could find it!
MDPATSFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 02:12 PM   #4
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 131
Default The Math

If a player can run 40 yds in 5 seconds (most are faster)
This equates to 8 yds per second
0.2 sec of hang time is worth 1.6 yards

If a player can run 40 yds in 4 seconds (hypothetically but bounding)
This equates to 10 yds per second
0.2 sec of hang time is worth 2 yards.

Point is increases in hang time on the order of .1 to .2 are not significant if the penalty is loss of yardage.

Coachs probably are looking at consistancy. Is his hang time consistant with distance having a wide variation, or is his distance consistant with hang time being variable
LA Pats Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 02:18 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
Oswlek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,389
Default Re: The Math

Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Pats Fan
If a player can run 40 yds in 5 seconds (most are faster)
This equates to 8 yds per second
0.2 sec of hang time is worth 1.6 yards

If a player can run 40 yds in 4 seconds (hypothetically but bounding)
This equates to 10 yds per second
0.2 sec of hang time is worth 2 yards.

Point is increases in hang time on the order of .1 to .2 are not significant if the penalty is loss of yardage.

Coachs probably are looking at consistancy. Is his hang time consistant with distance having a wide variation, or is his distance consistant with hang time being variable
You need to double the yardage; not only has the returner began running, but the coverage is given more time to get downfield.

I'm sure the difference is more than pure yardage, though. It also messes up the timing of the blocking on the return.
Oswlek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563