The biggest blunder of 2005... - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-16-2006, 12:02 AM   #1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,350
Default The biggest blunder of 2005...

was, in my opinion, cutting Kory Chapman and putting him on the p.s. instead of the active roster. I realize some will see this as Monday Morning QB-ing, but this seemed foolish AT THE TIME.

Seems like every year one of the last few cuts leaves us scratching our heads - like in 2004 when Terrell Buckley got cut in favor of an extra OL (Hallen maybe?), who promptly retired THE NEXT DAY. Meanwhile, T-Buck signed elsewhere (Miami? Denver?) and we end up in dire straits at DB for most of the rest of the year.

Having been watching some pre-season game-tape recently - thanks to dr - I was amazed that Chapman got cut. The guy looked terrific - a Corey-type back who we all now know we really could've used. I think BB/Pioli tried to get cute and slip him onto the practice squad - obviously that came back to bite us. Once Indy picked him up, I kept waiting for them to cut him - they only grabbed him once they had THREE RB's injured. But even with their own guys getting healthy, they held onto him.

In any case, I guess the point of this post is...um...well, first of all, Where the Hell is Kory Chapman and can we get him back? Then again, at this point, do we even need him? All I know is we sure as Hell could've used him last year.

Let's hope 2006 is the year we buck the trend and make our last few cuts prudently and hope they don't come back to haunt us.

Last edited by patsox23; 06-16-2006 at 12:13 AM..
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-16-2006, 12:24 AM   #2
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,114
Default 20-20 hindsight

Nope!

The biggest blunder IN HINDSIGHT, was in NOT signing MLB Jeremiah Trotter who was a Free Agent. It was a a subject under lots of discussion.

What might have been if the Pats had an adequate interior LB crew for the season? Do they win another game and host a palyoff game? Do they go the Super Bow? Do the win three straight?

But they didn't know that TJ would be ruled out by the medics later that year before Training camp because of concussions.
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 09:54 AM   #3
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsox23
In any case, I guess the point of this post is...um...well, first of all, Where the Hell is Kory Chapman and can we get him back? Then again, at this point, do we even need him? All I know is we sure as Hell could've used him last year.
He's still with the Colts as their #3 RB behind Rhodes and Addai.
pats1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:05 AM   #4
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 133
Default

This is the biggest blunder of 2005 ? A 4th string running back ?

What about signing Duane Starks and Monty Beisel to be starters and thinking they were going to actually produce ?

Chapman may have gotten into a couple of games do to injuries, but Starks and Beisel almost completely killed the season.
mcdonut16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:06 AM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
5 Rings for Brady!!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,753
Default

This might have been a 'training camp' blunder, but the biggest screw ups to me are clearly letting Ty Law go (unless it would have been simply impossible to work out his cap hit that season), and not resigning Ted Washington, and releasing Keith Traylor in the middle of his contract because he didn't come to offseason workouts in Foxboro.

We flat could have won the superbowl with Ty Law's ten interceptions, and also with either Washington or Traylor to take over when Seymour went down and Wilfork suddenely forgot how to play for several weeks. We would have won more games, and maybe a bi-week if we beat Denver, regular season.

The Washington thing was more understandable than letting Keith Traylor not play out a veteran minimum deal and having him go to Miami and squash Dan Koppen.
5 Rings for Brady!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:08 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
5 Rings for Brady!!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,753
Default

Yes, I realize that Washington was actually an '04 issue, but we wouldn't have missed Seymour like we did if we had either former Bear to hol down the D-Line.
5 Rings for Brady!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:10 AM   #7
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

I'd say it was not making Bruschi walk around the plane on those long flights to keep his blood moving

Aside from that going into the season with only Faulk as a real backup to Dillon has to be it. Looks like we learned from that and corrected it.
BelichickFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:12 AM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5 Rings for Brady!!
This might have been a 'training camp' blunder, but the biggest screw ups to me are clearly letting Ty Law go (unless it would have been simply impossible to work out his cap hit that season), and not resigning Ted Washington, and releasing Keith Traylor in the middle of his contract because he didn't come to offseason workouts in Foxboro.

We flat could have won the superbowl with Ty Law's ten interceptions, and also with either Washington or Traylor to take over when Seymour went down and Wilfork suddenely forgot how to play for several weeks. We would have won more games, and maybe a bi-week if we beat Denver, regular season.

The Washington thing was more understandable than letting Keith Traylor not play out a veteran minimum deal and having him go to Miami and squash Dan Koppen.
Good ideas/responses from everyone - I should have been more careful in naming the thread b/c I really did want this to focus on Kory Chapman and proclaiming him as THE biggest blunder seems to have gotten us off-track. There were definitely others to point to.

As for Ty Law's 10 interceptions, I think that's kind of a silly thing to say. Those 10 picks are not transferable - who's to say he would have had the same kind of season AT ALL in New England.

And I'm not sure we should be pooh-poohing the potential contributions of "a 4th-string RB." We absolutely could have used him - and in more than just a few games. Corey Dillon played hurt a lot of times b/c of the lack of depth there, and having an actually viable option at RB could have helped a lot.

But yes, Starks was a pretty big blunder, and we all would've liked to see Trotter here, in retrospect. Not sure he was a fit, but I can't imagine he'd have hurt.

Traylor/Washington? Eh. Washington left two years ago and I think Wilfork, after a slow-ish start, was terrific.

Last edited by IcyPatriot; 09-26-2005 at 09:32 PM..
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:13 AM   #9
On The Game Day Roster
 
old 55's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Herndon VA
Posts: 305
My Mood: Aggressive
Send a message via AIM to old 55
Default what about eckels?

This kid was a real find and ran very well in pre-season.

We cut him and Saban signed him immediately,then put him on military reserve status. If we had done that, we would have been able to stash him away.

We had to sign another RB during the season due to all the RB injuries too. It would have been nice to have this kid to go to.
old 55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 10:17 AM   #10
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default

Eckels was just a straight line runner like a FB. I don't think he'd have made much of a difference.
BelichickFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC