It is pretty obvious to me... - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2006, 11:51 AM   #1
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
PATRIOTS-80's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,784
Default It is pretty obvious to me...

that the offensive base for the Patriots will be 2 TE, considering the fact that we drafted for TE depth.

Last year we only had 3 RB on the opening day roster. I think its obvious that BB is going to trim from 6 WR (which we had last year), down to 5, because we are going to need some roster spots if we expand our RB core from 3.

Another thing to consider is the numbers

year.........Brady's completions..........completions to WR.......% of compl. to WR
2005...........334.........208...........62%
2004...........288.........162...........56%
2003...........317.........165...........52%

From these numbers, its obvious to see that last year Brady's completions to his WRs were more than he has had in the last three years. Expect our offense to be closer to the 2003 edition (when Brady threw to his backs and TE) than the 2005 edition (lots of throws to the WRs).

Last edited by PATRIOTS-80; 06-06-2006 at 11:54 AM..
PATRIOTS-80 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-06-2006, 12:14 PM   #2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 703
Default

Just a thought on this.

We all know the Patriots have liked the screen pass. Usually to Faulk.

Now they will have the options of Watson, or our shiny new ultra fast and supposedly glue handed RB Maroney. Does anyone else wonder if we might start to see the screen pass work its way back to the top of our offensive repertoire except to younger faster and more sure handed guys?
14thDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 12:20 PM   #3
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,717
Default

Patriots-80,

thanks for the numbers, they're very interetsing and I agree with you that the percentages will be thrown back towards the '03 numbers.

The one thing I'll have to say is that the Pats were predominantly (almost exclusively, in fact) a 2 TE team last year and even in 2004 they used a whole lot of 2 TE sets. I think it's quite likely that all 4 TEs will be on the active roster because all 4 of them are solid (at least) ST players. I'm curious to see if Mills can play the role of a 3rd down back with the occasional draw play - similar to the way Larry Centers was used here.
bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 12:41 PM   #4
On The Game Day Roster
 
jimmyjames's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: portland, or
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 14thDragon
Just a thought on this.

We all know the Patriots have liked the screen pass. Usually to Faulk.

Now they will have the options of Watson, or our shiny new ultra fast and supposedly glue handed RB Maroney. Does anyone else wonder if we might start to see the screen pass work its way back to the top of our offensive repertoire except to younger faster and more sure handed guys?

When was the screen pass NOT a huge component of the offense?
jimmyjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 12:46 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,521
My Mood: Grumpy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyjames
When was the screen pass NOT a huge component of the offense?
When Bledsoe was QB. His Drewness was unwilling and unable (most often overthrew) to throw the screen pass.
PatsWickedPissah is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 03:33 PM   #6
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 14thDragon
Just a thought on this.

We all know the Patriots have liked the screen pass. Usually to Faulk.

Now they will have the options of Watson, or our shiny new ultra fast and supposedly glue handed RB Maroney. Does anyone else wonder if we might start to see the screen pass work its way back to the top of our offensive repertoire except to younger faster and more sure handed guys?
The TE screen pass was a key component of our offense last season, and provided a large chunk of the Patriots' highlights films for 2006.
GoWhalers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 04:52 PM   #7
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,354
Default

The screen pass has been an ENORMOUS weapon in the Pats' arsenal since Belichick got here. I don't see how it could possibly be "brought back." It never left.
patsox23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC