05-16-2006, 06:01 PM
|
#5
|
|
PatsFans.com Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,759
|
It depends.
If we are tight against the cap, then I have a different answer than if we have cap room.
We do have cap room, and quite a bit to use on FA(s). Who else would you use it on?
We have rookies to sign that wont cost much, players to extend that will cost some, but far from all we have available.
IMO, Law is the best player out there to sign.
The second consideration is long term cap room. I will ASSUME we will have less room down the road than we do right now (that partially explains why we haven't spent so heavily) and would go low on signing bonus, (to prevent cap hits if he doesnt survive the contract) and a higher first year salary. I would add ROSTER BONUSSES each year including this one.
I think realistically it takes 3 yr 12mill to sign him.
I want no more than 3mill to be signing bonus.
I would split the salaries (9mill over 3 yrs) equally into roster bonuses and salary. (the roster bonus gives us a decision point, and is not amortized)
2006 1mill/1mill salary/roster bonus
2007 1.5mill/1.5mill
2008 2mill/2mil
Cap cost to us is 3mill, 4mill, 5mill
Law recieves 5/3/4
Last edited by Johnny Mac; 08-27-2005 at 02:13 AM..
|
|
|