Do the Pats "need" Ty Law? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2006, 07:36 AM   #1
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,199
Default Do the Pats "need" Ty Law?

Is he a "need" for this team? I say no, with one caveat. That is if Rodney can't make it back 100%. If Rodney can't , then we WOULD need a vet back there (as a Safety, Ty) with swagger who loves to hit and knows the system inside and out.

Rodney gave the secondary a fear factor for opposing receivers. If he's not there, then a beefed up Ty Law could do the same.
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-03-2006, 07:49 AM   #2
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,660
My Mood: Devilish
Default

Can we get by without him? yes. Can we make it to the SB without him? yes.

However he would be a good player to pick up, if the price is right. I don't think that he is looking for what he was last year.
PATSNUTme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 07:54 AM   #3
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATSNUTme
Can we get by without him? yes. Can we make it to the SB without him? yes.

However he would be a good player to pick up, if the price is right. I don't think that he is looking for what he was last year.
Without him AND Rodney? I think we do need at least one of those two in the secondary.

I agree, if Rodney's back 100%, we don't need Ty.
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 07:56 AM   #4
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
mavfan2390's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,067
Send a message via MSN to mavfan2390
Default

I want to see Law, Harrison, Wilson, and Hobbs out there. Law needs to deflate himself, and ask for a reasonable price instead of pulling this Latrell Sprewell crap.
mavfan2390 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 07:57 AM   #5
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
the taildragger's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 559
Default

no.

not at the $$ he wants.

Losing Rodney turned out to be far worse than replacing Law with Earthwind Moreland, Hank Poteat and Troy brown. When you can alternate street free agents and receivers into the corner slot and continue to shut teams down, it means the position is highly overrated.

Every week the pundits called our secondary "weak," and every week we were picked on by QBs who figured the same thing, and every week the secondary played just as strong as when Law was back there.

'04 Manning against NFL = 49 TDs
'04 Manning against secondary he was supposed to shred without Law = 3 points.

corner is easily the most overrated position in football. smart teams don't pay corners anywhere near $10M.

Last edited by the taildragger; 05-03-2006 at 08:03 AM..
the taildragger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 07:59 AM   #6
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mavfan2390
I want to see Law, Harrison, Wilson, and Hobbs out there. Law needs to deflate himself, and ask for a reasonable price instead of pulling this Latrell Sprewell crap.
Law and Harrison at S (with Tebucky and Sanders backing them)

Wilson and Hobbs at CB (with Samuels and Gay backing them)

The Scotts for depth.

Makes me (almost) feel better about LB weakness.
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 08:02 AM   #7
Maude
 
shmessy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the taildragger
no.

not at the $$ he wants.

Losing Rodney turned out to be far worse than replacing Law with Earthwind Moreland, Hank Poteat and Troy brown.

Every week the pundits called our secondary "weak," and every week we were picked on by QBs who figured the same thing, and every week our secondary played just as strong as when Law was back there.

'04 Manning against NFL = 49 TDs
'04 Manning against secondary he was supposed to shred without Law = 3 points.

corner is easily the most overrated position in football.

smart teams don't pay corners anywhere near $10M.
This year, he realizes he won't get anything near $10 million. After the draft and some of the maneuvering it's probably down to us and KC. I'd be ok with $2-3 million and loads of incentives (but I leave that to Miguel and those other posters who, unlike me know what the hell their talking about on the cap situation).
__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com
shmessy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 08:38 AM   #8
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,660
My Mood: Devilish
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shmessy
Without him AND Rodney? I think we do need at least one of those two in the secondary.

I agree, if Rodney's back 100%, we don't need Ty.
I don't know how many times I have to say this. Rodney wil be starting game one of the regular season.

If he is 85-90% of what he once was, that is better than 100% of everyone else.
PATSNUTme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 08:39 AM   #9
Alk
In the Starting Line-up
 
Alk's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,061
Send a message via MSN to Alk Send a message via Yahoo to Alk
Default

I can't believe how many people think Hobbs should be starting over Samuel. Granted, Samuel isn't great by any means but he's still better than Hobbs.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Alk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2006, 08:45 AM   #10
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Brady-To-Branch's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: 43 miles west of Gillette Stadium
Posts: 722
Default

Sure, the Pats could use him. But the real questions are...
Does he want to play here?
Has he mended fences with BB?
Will he play here for less $$$?

IMO, I'll be shocked if Law Returns. Once a mercenary, always a mercenary.
__________________
New England Patriots Super Bowl Champions:
2001 2003 2004

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Brady-To-Branch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC