Value Manuevering Award: GB? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 05:23 AM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,826
My Mood: Angelic
Default Value Manuevering Award: GB?

How about that cascade of deals GB pulled based initially on the Denver pick they got for Javon Walker?

Okay, out goes disgruntled receiver, for pick 37.

Out goes pick 37, along with 139, for 47, 93, 148. Out goes 36, to the Pats, for 52 and 75.

Then out goes 93 for 109 and 183. And out goes 109 for 115 and 185.

Total Started With.........Total Ended Up With
Walker, 139, 36 47, 52, 75, 115, 148, 183, 185

I think I got this right.

So for the cost of a guy that wouldn't be productive there anyway, a second, and a fifth, GB ends up with two seconds, an early third, a fourth, a fifth, and two sixths.

And naturally, Denver gets to say "our favorite pick? Getting Javon Walker in the second round" (Sound familiar?)

This little manuever netted them three extra early rounders, in rounds 2-4, plus a fifth and two sixths (not counting Walker's value.)

Anybody want to do the math on the value chart, omitting of course the initial Walker swap?

PFnV

PS, this in no way completes the process, which the Pack failed to realize. You have to actually make good selections to realize the value you made available... as always, I'll wait a couple years for a hard and fast opinion on that one. But it doesn't look good from where I'm sitting.
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-01-2006, 06:20 AM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
Bostonian1962's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,042
My Mood: Happy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa
How about that cascade of deals GB pulled based initially on the Denver pick they got for Javon Walker?

Okay, out goes disgruntled receiver, for pick 37.

Out goes pick 37, along with 139, for 47, 93, 148. Out goes 36, to the Pats, for 52 and 75.

Then out goes 93 for 109 and 183. And out goes 109 for 115 and 185.

Total Started With.........Total Ended Up With
Walker, 139, 36 47, 52, 75, 115, 148, 183, 185

I think I got this right.

So for the cost of a guy that wouldn't be productive there anyway, a second, and a fifth, GB ends up with two seconds, an early third, a fourth, a fifth, and two sixths.

And naturally, Denver gets to say "our favorite pick? Getting Javon Walker in the second round" (Sound familiar?)

This little manuever netted them three extra early rounders, in rounds 2-4, plus a fifth and two sixths (not counting Walker's value.)

Anybody want to do the math on the value chart, omitting of course the initial Walker swap?

PFnV

PS, this in no way completes the process, which the Pack failed to realize. You have to actually make good selections to realize the value you made available... as always, I'll wait a couple years for a hard and fast opinion on that one. But it doesn't look good from where I'm sitting.
Good stuff PatsFanner. They did it for Farve.
Bostonian1962 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC