07-22-2010, 04:52 PM
|
#8
|
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,373
|
Re: Reiss on Brady: ?He?ll be there.?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
Please explain to me the irreparable damage to the team of Brady (or any veteran on the offense) not being present for the first two weeks of Training Camp. Is it really a terrible to his teamates for Brady to indicate that he wants to sign a long term deal with the team, rather than risk injury and/or free agency. Is it really a terrible message to his teamates for Brady to want this issue taken care of so that it is not a cloud over the rest of Camp, the preseason and the regular season.
I would MUCH, MUCH rather have Brady a month late for camp than have him play the season with no extension.
From Brady's persepective, and mine, it seems that it is worth a couple of weeks to try to get resolution now.
Besides, Brady has absolutely no need for two a days!
|
Why should they give him a new deal if he choses not to fulfill his opbligations for his current deal?
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|
|