Did the Pats trade #75 or #86? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2006, 05:37 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
PonyExpress's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,646
Default Did the Pats trade #75 or #86?

Did the Pats trade #75 to move up to #37, or #86? If they traded #75, isn't that too much according to the Value Chart?
PonyExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-29-2006, 05:38 PM   #2
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Jacky Roberts's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress
Did the Pats trade #75 to move up to #37, or #86? If they traded #75, isn't that too much according to the Value Chart?
They traded 75. 86 is their next pick
__________________
"Spirituality, Faith, and Democracy are the cornerstones of our country. We are all Patriots, and tonight the Patriots are World Champions."
-Robert Kraft, 2/3/2002




To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Jacky Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 05:42 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
PonyExpress's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacky Roberts
They traded 75. 86 is their next pick
Ouch. #37= 530 pts, #52=380 pts, and #75=245 pts. 380 + 245= 625>530. Did Green Bay throw in any other later round picks?
PonyExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 05:45 PM   #4
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Jacky Roberts's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress
Ouch. #37= 530 pts, #52=380 pts, and #75=245 pts. 380 + 245= 625>530. Did Green Bay throw in any other later round picks?
Who cares? That value point thing is ludicrous. Different players are more valueable to different teams. I'll take a potentially super weapon for Brady even if it means losing a draft pick. The point method doesn't account for the fact that they dont have to overpay for a Javon Walker, either.
__________________
"Spirituality, Faith, and Democracy are the cornerstones of our country. We are all Patriots, and tonight the Patriots are World Champions."
-Robert Kraft, 2/3/2002




To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Jacky Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 05:49 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
PonyExpress's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacky Roberts
Who cares? That value point thing is ludicrous. Different players are more valueable to different teams. I'll take a potentially super weapon for Brady even if it means losing a draft pick. The point method doesn't account for the fact that they dont have to overpay for a Javon Walker, either.
Your attitude about draft picks seems cavalier. My question is valid.
PonyExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 05:52 PM   #6
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
kolbitr's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston more or less
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress
Your attitude about draft picks seems cavalier. My question is valid.

I really wish they had been able to keep the earlier pick. It seems as if GB needed to make a move more than NE realized...maybe. Regardless, they certainly have done well with the trade. I don't imagine we'll move up any more...
kolbitr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 05:53 PM   #7
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PonyExpress
Your attitude about draft picks seems cavalier. My question is valid.
The Pats traded their #52 overall pick and #75 overall for the #36 overall from Green Bay.

To answer your question according to my value chart the Pats paid 595 points for the #36 pick which is worth 540 pts. So they gave up 55 pts in value to get the GUY they wanted. 55 pts is worth about a mid 4th rounder.

Considering how little chance a 4th rounder has to make the team and the Pats still have their 3rd round pick and TWO 4th round picks left, this move gives up an inappreciable amount of value to get imo a 1st round talent WR in the 2nd. Great value trade!!

Maroney + Jackson = Brilliant!! Unexpected but brilliant draft by BB
VJCPatriot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 05:54 PM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,714
Default

Im reminded of BB's comments of moving up for a player, not for a pick.
__________________
Felger started his question, "Correct me if I'm wrong," BB quickly interjected, "I can't wait--"


``The officials now are evaluating the players and their performance, I mean, that's great,'' Belichick deadpanned. ``I can't say how much that means to me, really.''
jczxohn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 07:12 PM   #9
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: nh
Posts: 174
Cool

A week ago posters were advocating moving up from 21 to 13 to take Jackson before Denver got him. Now we quibble?!
braveht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2006, 07:21 PM   #10
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Feep_FLA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 513
Default

Simply put: To give up 55 points to move up to get Chad Jackson at #36, who was projected as a much higher pick is just plain stealing..... 55 points means nothing, getting a high quality pick at 36: Priceless!
Feep_FLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC