ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Reiss' rankings are primarily based on four factors:
1. Talent.
2. Importance in the short and long term (which projects development).
3. Positional value.
4. Economic value.
-------------------------
Jeez. Some of the players I have in my squad dont match who he has. And I certainly wouldn't have Mike Wright as my 20th most valuable player. (At least 15 positions too high IMHO). And Fred Taylor at 41 !!!! ???? !!!! Jeez. He's at least ten places higher on my list.
Last edited by Ian; 07-09-2010 at 07:10 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
A 60-man squad is appropriate at the moment. After all, there will be injuries. Welker and Mankins may or may not have roster spots gor Game One. I find his ratings of Wright, G. Warren and Taylor especially interesting.
Some notes, nitpicks and surprises
OFFENSE (25)
If Welker and Mankins are back, I guess his roster is fine. He does have only 8 OL's and Larsen as the backup center. I would include Connolly, but I'm fine with Connolly at 54. A roster spot will open. If not (and we have Welker and Mankins), then we're fine in any case.
I'm fine with Aiken and Slater as two special teamers (Reiss calls them wide receivers which is sort of silly).
DEFENSE (25)
I have only one problem with his list. I would keep another corner instead of Pryor. Green is gone and we've brought in Warren AND Lewis. I just don't see the need for Pryor. I'd rather cut Pryor and keep Wheatley or a street free agent as a 5th corner. Arrington is fine as a 6th corner, a special teamer.
SPECIALISTS (3)
Reiss keeps the obvious 3.
FIRST TO THE PRACTICE SQUAD
I guess that would be Welch and Crable. Deaderick didn't make Reiss' list, but I woiuld expect him to be on the Practice Squad.
LAST CUTS
Larsen sends Ohrnberger packing. I'm fine with that. I'm not as sure of Connolly. I would like to ahve him as a 9th OL.
BOTTOM LINE
I'm fine with the roster, although I expect to see Connolly on the 53 instead of Mankins, and would like to see Wheatley (or another corner) instead of Pryor. In the end, I think Reiss did a fime job.
Very interesting, and thanks for the heads up. FYI, though, posting copyrighted content in full like this is a definite no-go, and can cause a lot of trouble for Ian. Especially with someone like Reiss, who we actually want to support with page hits. For details, check out the stickied thread in this forum.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Very interesting, and thanks for the heads up. FYI, though, posting copyrighted content in full like this is a definite no-go, and can cause a lot of trouble for Ian. Especially with someone like Reiss, who we actually want to support with page hits. For details, check out the stickied thread in this forum.
If i may add, also please provide the link to the article.
I see some spots where I'd disagree pretty strongly with his rankings (Warren below TBC, seriously?), but it's an interesting time killer for the offseason.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
I see some spots where I'd disagree pretty strongly with his rankings (Warren below TBC, seriously?), but it's an interesting time killer for the offseason.
I agree, but at best this is subjective.. not sure how this can be measured, the obvious.. Brady, Welker and Mayo but the rest is a crapshoot.
interesting the pick of Butler over Bodden..
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
And this is NOT MR's 53 but his ranking of players in order of importance to the team.
Bit of a strange criterion but I have one quarrel: how can anyone possibly think that the back-up quarterback is only No. 40 in importance to the team? Let's hope it never happens again, but stuff happens ...
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]
Jeez. Some of the players I have in my squad dont match who he has. And I certainly wouldn't have Mike Wright as my 20th most valuable player. (At least 15 positions too high IMHO). And Fred Taylor at 41 !!!! ???? !!!! Jeez. He's at least ten places higher on my list.
Some writers said Taylor looked old during minicamps and could be in danger of being cut.
Reiss' rankings are primarily based on four factors:
1. Talent.
2. Importance in the short and long term (which projects development).
3. Positional value.
4. Economic value.
-------------------------
Jeez. Some of the players I have in my squad dont match who he has. And I certainly wouldn't have Mike Wright as my 20th most valuable player. (At least 15 positions too high IMHO). And Fred Taylor at 41 !!!! ???? !!!! Jeez. He's at least ten places higher on my list.
You'd have Fred Taylor ahead of Mike Wright by at least 5 spots?
Ridiculous.
__________________
Paul, London - Patriot and Proud