Trading up in the 1st rd.- Actual costs - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2006, 02:16 PM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the ledge
Posts: 1,165
My Mood: Amused
Default Trading up in the 1st rd.- Actual costs

Most all of you have heard about the Draft Matrix. This places a relative value on every pick of the draft for use in trades. I heard that it was started w/ Jimmy Johnson in Dallas, but it might have started earlier, and become popular under his regime. Regardless, every team uses some form of this matrix and I hear that they are relatively similar. For discussion purposes hear is the one from Gil Brandt

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/6330687

I thought that you would all have an interest in what it would cost to actually move up, using the 1st round as my example. You will notice that I limited my picks to trade to 3. Firstly, otherwise I could be working on this all day. Secondly, picks in rounds 6 & 7 have so very little value when talking about 1st round picks that they are just levelers (throw ins to make a closer balance). Remember, our picks 205 & 206 are compensation picks awarded by the NFL and can’t be traded.

#21= 800
#52= 380
#75= 215
#86= 160
#106= 82
#136= 38
#191= 15
#229= 1

Be like Mike (Ditka) Trade: total value of our tradable picks =1749 which falls halfway between picks 4 &5 in the draft.

For pick 8: Cost= 21 +52+75
For pick 9: Cost= 21 + 52 + 86
For pick 11: Cost=21 + 52 + 106
For pick 11: Cost=21 + 52 + 118
For pick 12/13: Cost= 21 + 52
For pick 12/13: Cost = 21 + 75 + 86
For pick 14: Cost = 21+75 + 106
For pick 14/15: Cost= 21 + 75 + 118
For pick 15: Cost = 21 + 75 + 136
For pick 16: Cost = 21 + 75
For Pick 17: Cost = 21 + 86
For pick 18/19: Cost = 21 + 106
For pick 20: Cost = 21 + 118 (though this is a rare trade)

Anyway, I hope this helps…
SamBamsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-25-2006, 02:37 PM   #2
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,826
My Mood: Angelic
Default

Thanks for putting this info up. I never understood the great urgency to trade up, but that's just me. I always assumed those guys talking about trading into the top 10 were being silly. But then I did read a story on cnn.com about how a guy is trying to parlay a ball-point pen into a home, based on savvy trading. He's made it all the way to a year's stay in some guy's house. If we're going the trade route, we need to hire this guy.

Something tells me the Pats will get by somewhere in the vicinity of their present position.

By the way - there's an interesting bit about where first round choices fall, and what length of contract you can sign them to, somewhere on this board. I'm not sure whether your figures take the desireability of longer contracts into account. It would be a minor factor anyway.

One other point - people will always give you a better next-year pick than this-year pick, for some reason. You see this all the time - you give away a number 1, and you get a number 1 next year and a number 3 this year, that sort of thing.

I wonder if we could bundle some late (probably not round 6/7, can't be done) picks, and get a 3 or a 4 next year?

Just babbling,

PFnV

Last edited by PatsFanInVa; 04-25-2006 at 02:39 PM..
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 04:16 PM   #3
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 825
Default

But it doesn't always have to go by this. Remember when we swapped picks with Chicago for Ty Warren, we only gave up a 6th rounder to move up, but it should've been more based on the chart. So if a team wants to, they'll do it.
tatepatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 04:26 PM   #4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Patsfanin Philly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suburban Philly via Boston
Posts: 6,069
My Mood: Blah
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa

I wonder if we could bundle some late (probably not round 6/7, can't be done) picks, and get a 3 or a 4 next year?

PFnV
Somebody call the Ravens.......they're always interested.......
I think the concept is future value versus present value and you'd rather have the player now as opposed to the future......
It makes sense if you've got a talented team and too many draft picks ...
(nice problem to have) or you think a future draft is more quality-laden....

I wonder if the NFL has some restriction on trading draft picks conditionally which is why you don't see too many (?any) 'top ten protected" compared to the NBA where you need an MBA, PhD and CPa to figure out the draft....
Patsfanin Philly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 07:13 PM   #5
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the ledge
Posts: 1,165
My Mood: Amused
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patsfanin Philly
Somebody call the Ravens.......they're always interested.......
I think the concept is future value versus present value and you'd rather have the player now as opposed to the future......
It makes sense if you've got a talented team and too many draft picks ...
(nice problem to have) or you think a future draft is more quality-laden....

I wonder if the NFL has some restriction on trading draft picks conditionally which is why you don't see too many (?any) 'top ten protected" compared to the NBA where you need an MBA, PhD and CPa to figure out the draft....
You can't protect a pick, per se, but you can make it conditional based on production of the player. Basically what i mean is that it can't be conditional based on your own ineptitude like in the NBA.
And this whole thing is based on a chart I make up every year. Really I make it up for the middle rds., 2-5, but when I transfered it from excell I decided to reverse the chart to make it more easily readible. Then they expected me to do some work... there will be more following tomorrow.

Last edited by SamBamsFan; 04-25-2006 at 07:16 PM..
SamBamsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC