Miguel

The Pats are under the cap by 17 to 18 million. My proposed deal would take $4 million of that cap space leaving the Pats with 13 to 14 million to address the holes in the team, sign draft picks, sign players 52 and 53, sign a 8-man practice squad, provide an injury replacement reserve, and extend Branch and Samuel.

My proposed deal would be the biggest ever for a DL in terms of new money over a 3-year period and over a 5-year period.

__________________
My youngest sister's best friend is on the board of directors of a food pantry in Malden, Massachusetts that distributed 285,000 meals and meal equivalents in 2005. I am asking that if you have found my salary cap pages useful that if you are able to do so, please make a donation to it. Please contact me for more information.

BelichickFan

I would possibly move some signing bonus or salary to roster bonus this year to use a little more room now and a little less later.

But send it to : bill.belichick@patriots.com, it looks good to me

Pats726

Makes sense..but would the Pats agree?? Would Sey??? Reasonable..but...it makes sense...what you say about the cqp is so on target...so?? Why won't they??

PatsWickedPissah

Me, I'd take it. Dunno how I'd spend all that money though.
It makes sense and has the advantage of making the worst cap hit this season where we have the slack. I'd always thought that our cap triming was for Big Sey and the Twig deals, not for the Kraft family estate inheritance.

FreeTedWilliams

20 million guarenteed up front money, that's alot of cash!! Tough to turn that down, plus no dummy years at the end, causing us to release him. Hopefully they can get something down and end this drama before it starts.

__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

PatsFanInVa

Another 2.5 million to this year's roster bonus, taking the average hit down by half a million/year, and taking this year's remaining money down to about 11 million? This would seriously tie the team's hands in terms of FA if done now, but by the time of the deal, we will pretty much know who we did and did not pick up in FA. We might be able to squeeze in Peerless Price, but no Eric Moulds, maybe Brad Kassel, but not Lavar Arrington.

Cutting it too tight?

PFnV

ralmat55

Has any non-quarterback ever received $20 million in bonuses? I can't see the Patriots being the first team to do it.

I'd offer a $10m signing bonus in 06 with a $6m option bonus due by 3/1/07. while ncreasing his 06 base salary by $4m. Overall, this would result in a additional $6m against the 06 cap leaving the Pats with about $10m of available cap space.

If the plan is to fill their holes through the draft and with minimum-salary free agents as it appears, $10m should be enough to do that and also extend other contracts such as Branch and Koppen.

tombonneau

I disagree. I think giving $20MM to Seymour as a SB is a good thing from a Pats PR perspective. They are somehow being mislablelled as cheap by the media & some fans. But giving Sey what he is due and paying him very generous market value sends the signal that if you are a key player and are valued, NE will do what it has to do to make you happy.

IMO, every team should be lucky to have 2-3 guys that they would pay this sort of money to. I don't believe its crippling if you have 2 guys (in this case Brady & Sey) being paid Top 3 money for their position as long as they continue to play at that level. That is how you win championships.

Where you get into trouble is when you make guys like Adam Archuleta the highest paid player at their position.

borg

The way I see it, the Pats are trying to set up there roster for another prolonged run which doesn't include this year and maybe not even next. By securing its base...Brady, Seymour, Branch, Oline...for 4-6 years...I can see BB using cap space now on Seymour and Branch in the form of monster salaries that don't need to be prorated after 2006. Give Seymour an $18 mill salary for 2006 and $3-4 mill per year after and never worry about his cap space after 2006. Same with Branch but with less $$$. Then when Dillon gets dumped after next year, money gets freed up to sign the whomever, using traditional prorated bonuses.
A one time hit will guarantee the Pats will suit up the guys they want to make the next run with. Pre pay the piper and get younger.

arrellbee

Miguel - you have a very sound layout of possible contract for Seymour. If the Pats sign Seymour, it will be interesting to see how close you have forecast the actual numbers - you would likely be very very close.

The $45 Million dollar question remains, however, will the Patriots reach a deal with Seymour at all.

To the best of my knowledge, since Belichick and Pioli took over, the Patriots have never signed a contract making a player the highest paid player at their position (correction or clarifying info would be very welcome, Miguel). All factors taken into account over expected years of the contract, I don't think Brady's contract made him the highest paid player either. So this would be a pretty significant change or exception from previous practice. While I would never be surprised to see Belichick and Pioli do something different than previously (how many times have they reinforced that), personally I would be more surprised than not if they would give any player, Seymour included, the highest contract.

Your formula looks very sound for a reasonable highest paid contract. But, it would put the Patriots in a position of allocating over 10% of their cap next year to one player, and probably over 15% of their cap in 2008 to one player. I have to wonder if the Patriots would do that. It would certainly be a very surprisingly significant about-face from what has appeared to be their fundamental approach.

We also may well never know if the Patriots would have offered this high a contract, just like we will never know what they were willing to offer McGinest, Givens, or Vinatieri. For a couple reasons.
- Given this years funny-money cap jump, Seymour and agent would most likely be looking for a 'higher than any other player' contract to be 'higher' in terms of the excessive jumps that have occurred this year. If that were to be the case, which seems highly likely, it seems very unlikely that the Patriots would come to those terms when they look ahead to next year and judge that after this year's spending frenzie, there is going to be a lot less money floating around next year for free agents.
- Unless the Patriots come up with an offer that is so much 'higher' that Seymour and agent can't even dream that they can beat in it full free agency bidding next year, I would be very surprised if they can resist the allure of going to free agency next year. Even if overall free agency money is tighter next year, all it takes is two teams who are willing to go thru the roof to sign Seymour or one team to outbid only themselves. I would be awfully surprised if there wasn't at least one team like that.
- The Patriots appear to not leave even the smallest stones unturned. Doing an extension this year puts them in the position of paying out a huge amount of guaranteed money even if Seymour has a career-ending injury this year. By putting off the extension to next year, they put off their exposure to that possibility for a year. This is probably not a significant factor.

So what can we expect ? Crystal balls are notoriously hazy, but from past history maybe we can make a couple guesses.

Given that Seymour has already shown that he is willing to sit out rather than play for what he considers to be an insufficient amount of money, it seems more likely than not that we'll see the same thing this year. The Patriots seem to have shown that they are willing to negotiate and increase compensation in the case of Seymour (altho I'm not sure we know the exact nature of last year's negotiation). So as long as Seymour's demands aren't more than the Patriots are willing to pay versus just getting on without him, they may again reach a one year accomodation. On Seymour's side, he would weigh the chance of injury before his big payday versus making some decent coin this year as offered by the Pats. If he still sat out, he would likely return towards the end of the season to qualify for accruing this season so he still goes to free agency next year. Another possibility - and maybe Miguel can say whether we would have had any visibility of this - would be that part of last year's deal (or even a deal this year) was to include a sizable number of LTBE bonuses for this year - that would easily fit into the model of the Patriots where they are willing to pay for value while limiting their risk.

So what about next year's smoky crystal ball ? As I said, I personally think it reasonably unlikely that the Pats will feel they are in a position to negotiate an extension even next year. So one interesting possibility would be to franchise Seymour where they pay slightly less than top dollar and only have a one year term without the long term risk or cap commitment. Seems like that would be a Patriot idea of good business - and they have shown that they are willing to use the franchise tool in the past. That would also put them in a very strong position to trade Seymour for significant value in terms of a player or high draft pick(s) so that they wouldn't end up with nothing in return for him leaving. They would be in a position to have their cake or get a new dessert.

* One other thing that may well have been mentioned but I have just missed it (apologies in advance) is a possibility of trading Seymour this season. They might see a Seymour instant starter replacement available in a high draft pick or they might take a player in trade that they rate highly as well as lower pick(s). I would think this is a real possibility except that BB/SP seem pretty conservative when it comes to bird in the hand versus bird in the bush.

I'm sure some folks will be mighty upset with me for suggesting that we might lose Seymour - so be it, I understand completely and certainly can't fault you. But more interesting would be some thoughts on the underlying factors that I have mentioned above, or ones that I have probably missed, that tend to influence the odds of what will happen. Any kind of speculation and forecasting when it comes the Patriots is an IFFY proposition at best. But it doesn't keep it from being an interesting exercise.

Cheers.

Edit: * Well one thread at least where a trade was discussed was
IF...we can't extend Sey, do we trade him before the draft?
posted a couple weeks ago by SaCaCh.