Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2010, 02:51 AM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,254
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

If the Jets and Dolphins don't make moves to bolster thier receiving corps with top notch WRs ,does BB look elsewhere for the #1 pick?

Springs is an old man and Wilhite has been torched often,the team needed some new talent and depth at CB outside of Bodden and Butler and I think the new receivers in the east added to the desire to make the secondary stronger against big time threats like Holmes and Marshall.

We will pick up a pass rusher in the second round and CB in this draft is far less in talent after McCourty, so thats why I think BB took Devin at #1 before he could be scooped up.

Devin might not be on defense immediately, but in a few weeks into the season,he should be involved in situations before too long and as a rookie to help try to control those 2 new WR additions to the division.

I really think if those WR moves were not done by our division enemies,the Pats would have picked a different position at #1 and a lesser known CB Later in the draft.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by PATRIOTSFANINPA; 04-23-2010 at 02:59 AM..
PATRIOTSFANINPA is online now  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-23-2010, 03:04 AM   #2
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 244
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

The torching by the Colts and the Saints must also be fresh in the mind.

I don't hate the pick but we need to compliment it with pass rush
furry is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 03:09 AM   #3
All Pro Poster
 
PATRIOTSFANINPA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 15,254
My Mood: Bitchy
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by furry View Post
The torching by the Colts and the Saints must also be fresh in the mind.

I don't hate the pick but we need to compliment it with pass rush
BB probably also saw that talent laden pass rushers after #27 were 10x more available than corners,so why not wait for them at 44?....Jerry Hughes to the Colts did hurt a little I think though
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PATRIOTSFANINPA is online now  
Old 04-23-2010, 04:20 AM   #4
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 244
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA View Post
BB probably also saw that talent laden pass rushers after #27 were 10x more available than corners,so why not wait for them at 44?....Jerry Hughes to the Colts did hurt a little I think though
I wanted Hughes or Odrick and both now off the board to rivals stings. Hughes' size maybe did go against him as we thought it might

With Bills connection maybe he is thinking Dunlap now, and with guys like Kindle( who I don't think BB wants) or more likely the Misi's around it's not over yet.
furry is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 05:06 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,134
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Somewhere I read that the playing field is somewhat level for picks 16 to 45, I certainly hope so.. while I do not like McCourty, I understand the need to draft CB's
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 05:58 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,095
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

I don't think Holmes/Marshall really had anything to do with it. I think that the pick was the best player on their board at a position of need although probably not the biggest need. They have been saying for awhile that they believe the 3rd CB is a starter in the modern NFL.

If you want to point to players who added to drafting Mccourty in round 1 the more appropriate names are Springs, Wilhite, and Wheatley.
dhamz is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 06:40 AM   #7
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,551
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by furry View Post
The torching by the Colts and the Saints must also be fresh in the mind.
Yep, I think some people didn't watch last season. At all.

Now what they should do it make a list of CB and pass rushers and cross off those who were taken. Then they'll see why we took a CB last night and can still get a pass rusher today.
BelichickFan is online now  
Old 04-23-2010, 07:23 AM   #8
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,325
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA View Post
If the Jets and Dolphins don't make moves to bolster thier receiving corps with top notch WRs ,does BB look elsewhere for the #1 pick?

Springs is an old man and Wilhite has been torched often,the team needed some new talent and depth at CB outside of Bodden and Butler and I think the new receivers in the east added to the desire to make the secondary stronger against big time threats like Holmes and Marshall.

We will pick up a pass rusher in the second round and CB in this draft is far less in talent after McCourty, so thats why I think BB took Devin at #1 before he could be scooped up.

Devin might not be on defense immediately, but in a few weeks into the season,he should be involved in situations before too long and as a rookie to help try to control those 2 new WR additions to the division.

I really think if those WR moves were not done by our division enemies,the Pats would have picked a different position at #1 and a lesser known CB Later in the draft.
That's as rational an explanation as I've seen of the pick. "BB is worried about a position that wasn't at the top of the mediots' radar screen for Pats' 'needs,' thinks this is a special guy based on athleticism, versatility and position; he knows that there will other talents he values around when he picks next." I'll be interested to see if there's someone he wants so badly that he'll trade up a few slots to get him; Sergio Kindle?
__________________
It is what it is. It wasn't what it wasn't.

Last edited by PatsFanSince74; 04-23-2010 at 07:24 AM..
PatsFanSince74 is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 11:22 AM   #9
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,152
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA View Post
If the Jets and Dolphins don't make moves to bolster thier receiving corps with top notch WRs, does BB look elsewhere for the #1 pick?

Springs is an old man and Wilhite has been torched often; the team needed some new talent and depth at CB outside of Bodden and Butler and I think the new receivers in the east added to the desire to make the secondary stronger against big time threats like Holmes and Marshall.

We will pick up a pass-rusher in the second round and CB in this draft is far less in talent after McCourty, so thats why I think BB took Devin at #1 before he could be scooped up.

Devin might not be on defense immediately, but in a few weeks into the season, he should be involved in situations before too long and as a rookie to help try to control those 2 new WR additions to the division.

I really think if those WR moves were not done by our division enemies,the Pats would have picked a different position at #1 and a lesser-known CB later in the draft.
I don't think there's any doubt that McCourty was drafted as a counter-move to the moves at WR by the jesters & doofins, and as a means to keep Wilhite & Wheatley off the field (more proof of the putrescence of the 08 draft).

Besides, a CB was one of the Best Avail. Players regardless of position. Unfortunately, that CB was not McCourty - it was Kyle Wilson, taken by the jesters 2 picks later. Bill better not be wrong - again - on this one.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 12:39 PM   #10
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Providence, RI
Posts: 1,111
My Mood: Aggressive
Send a message via AIM to Aldogg
Default Re: Did Holmes and Marshall in the division add to drafting McCourty?

Yes, but its not only adding those guys into the division, its the way the league is now where teams have 3 starting caliber WRs usually, so you need 3 starting caliber corners or else that weak link in the D-Backfield will be getting torched, even more so like we saw last year when facing Indy and New Orleans.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Aldogg is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
25 years of drafting WRs tells me I like trading em better than drafting jeffbiologist Patriots Draft Talk 6 04-08-2008 11:12 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563