03-22-2006, 02:00 PM
|
#6
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Erie, Canada.
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
Or maybe he didn't really get any.
|
He got two from me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MoLewisrocks
The only defense Pats fans and watchers can really mount on this one is in Bill we trust. That's fine as long as you are prepared to admit that means he'll ger 'er done right about 50% of the time. More than most for sure, but not perfect by a long shot.
|
What's to defend?
The Pats shouldn't have to defend their stance that they didn't want to extend a buy-out deal to two aging veterans? Teams allow veterans to leave all the time each offseason. Are the Patriots not allowed to do the same?
And why should they have to defend their actions of allowing a decent, but not great, WR to go elsewhere? I mean it's not like Pats are the only team letting players leave because they are too expensive to retain.
It's hogwash. Just like Reiss' crappy article.
|
|
|