Ben Watson as our #2? - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2006, 08:44 PM   #11
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,210
My Mood: Angry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joker
I'm looking for Watson to be the centerpiece of a flea flicker/ staue of liberty play where the ball gets snapped to the fullback who pitches it out to the WR and he runs back behind the center and hands off to the QB who underhands to Watson as he stands there with his arm in the air and then Watson runs at the LB and as the linebacker gets close Watson tosses the ball over the LB's head as the confused LB looks around for it and now Watson gets hsi own self pass and runs down the sideline....I think that would be a great play and I hope the Patriots try it because, well gosh, we just have to do something else because we don't have any of the old players and there's no new guys and I'm scared and I want to see some changes....what do you guys think?
Any way we can work Ken Walter in there some place?
sieglo is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-16-2006, 08:53 PM   #12
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,643
My Mood: Amused
Default

Now Lining up at WR, Bugs Bunny. At OLB, Bugs Bunny. At ILB, Bugs Bunny, At Kicker, Bugs Bunny.

Ahhh helll. you get the gist...
*LOL*
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 08:53 PM   #13
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Joker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,778
My Mood: Amused
Default

Of course....use Walter as the QB....Brady is fading fast, if last season was any indication...plus we always have the pitch back to Flutie, drop kick for a FG if the LB stuffs Watson
Joker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 09:15 PM   #14
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default

looking to statue of liberty plays, flea flickers and TE's at WR. Wow! This is not a sandlot team. It is a playoff team with an excellent set of offense schemes.

And BTW, Faulk would be a much better WR than Watson.

I do agree that Watson on a TE screen is a play that will be used a few times this year.
mgteich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 09:18 PM   #15
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,391
Default

It depends on what you mean by #2

Ben Coates had a few years with 80+ catches - but that didn't make him a WR nor did it mean we didn't have a #2 WR

We need more than 1 WR, and we will have more than 1 WR
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 09:31 PM   #16
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
smg93's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSixPat
It depends on what you mean by #2

Ben Coates had a few years with 80+ catches - but that didn't make him a WR nor did it mean we didn't have a #2 WR

We need more than 1 WR, and we will have more than 1 WR
I agree with this. I've said this before. I'm not really looking at Watson being a #2 WR but a #2 Option. With the years Ben Coates had here, he may not even be a #2 Option IF Watson can get open consistently.
smg93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2006, 10:01 PM   #17
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
old 55's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Herndon VA
Posts: 305
My Mood: Aggressive
Send a message via AIM to old 55
Talking I've said this for years now

And BTW, Faulk would be a much better WR than Watson.

--------------------------------------------------------
YES! Faulk would fit right in with the WRs and has very good hands.
old 55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 06:27 AM   #18
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smg93
I agree with this. I've said this before. I'm not really looking at Watson being a #2 WR but a #2 Option. With the years Ben Coates had here, he may not even be a #2 Option IF Watson can get open consistently.
Part of the reason your TEs get open is because defenders have to worry about up to 3+ other legitimate WR threats on the field. Ben Coates did it (I think) with defenders also keying on Terry Glenn, Shawn Jefferson and Troy Brown in his prime, not to mention Curtis Martin as a RB option.

As good as Branch is, he's not going to demand the equivilent coverage of all of the above
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 06:32 AM   #19
On The Game Day Roster
 
jeffd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 336
My Mood: Amazed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PSU
What's wrong with having Ben Watson replace Givens as the #2 receiver? With Givens having left for the Titans I kinda like this idea. Could you imagine this guy on a crackback situation?......He's bigger and faster then Givens was and he knows the system by now. Just thought of this and curious as to what you guys think.
What Watson can do is confuse the defense by making a 2 TE set into a 3 WR set by using some motion. He could also turn a 2 TE set or a 3 WR set into a 2 RB set by using motion. In a perfect (injury free) world I think this is what the Pats offense would like to do. Which would explain why they don't seem terribly concerned about WR's.
jeffd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2006, 06:57 AM   #20
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,660
My Mood: Devilish
Default

Thsi has been brought up twice in the past couple of weeks. It was greeted with total negitivity on this board.

It look like things have softened this time. If we bring it up three more times he'll be our #1 WR.
PATSNUTme is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC