ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I'm just wondering what people's thoughts are on this. It seems they haven't even approached him about a new deal. Is there something wrong in New England since Pioli left, these things seem to be left until the last minute. I know a lot of the players were taken aback by the trade of Seymour, this non-contact with Vince seems like a really bad idea to me.
It stinks of indecision on the part of the Patriots. Why leave this so late? Is it that they are leaning towards going to a 4-3 base? Has it got something to do with the CBA?
Why would we franchise the guy when its clear he wants a good long term deal and doesn't appear to want to break the bank either?
Would you take 1st and 2nd round picks in this years draft for him?
Is Myron Pryor good enough to start in 2010? I think he is well ahead of Brace.
I'm just confused by it all really. I've no problem if they let him go, as long as they believe that Pryor is up to a starting role and they get a really good deal out of it. I would prefer if he stayed though, imo he is the best NT in the league and by a long way too as he is a 3 down guy.
Whats you thoughts and please explain to me about the CBA if its part of this.
__________________
Fun fight game, no expertise needed and free with no catches
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
we have him by the balls....... there is nothing he can do.
No Cap year will be good for us because there is no pressing need to extend him to a long term deal just yet...... Thnx to the TAG....... he cannot do anything drastic. I do not see him sitting out...... PATS use the TAG in their favor and delay the long term signing..... Do not expect a contract extension anytime soon.
I'm just wondering what people's thoughts are on this. It seems they haven't even approached him about a new deal. Is there something wrong in New England since Pioli left, these things seem to be left until the last minute. I know a lot of the players were taken aback by the trade of Seymour, this non-contact with Vince seems like a really bad idea to me.
It stinks of indecision on the part of the Patriots. Why leave this so late? Is it that they are leaning towards going to a 4-3 base? Has it got something to do with the CBA?
Why would we franchise the guy when its clear he wants a good long term deal and doesn't appear to want to break the bank either?
Would you take 1st and 2nd round picks in this years draft for him?
Is Myron Pryor good enough to start in 2010? I think he is well ahead of Brace.
I'm just confused by it all really. I've no problem if they let him go, as long as they believe that Pryor is up to a starting role and they get a really good deal out of it. I would prefer if he stayed though, imo he is the best NT in the league and by a long way too as he is a 3 down guy.
Whats you thoughts and please explain to me about the CBA if its part of this.
1) Wilfork is most likely gone. He won't get franchised(Pats don't do this typically)
2) No team is stupid enough to give a #1 and #2 for a NT, and I don't care if player is a perennial pro-bowler and 1st ballot HOF....NFL is a business and the draft picks are very valuable commodities
3) Pryor is a backup at best, and Brace looks to be another Marquise Hill in the making if he could not beat our Pryor last year
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,377
re: The Vince Wilfork situation (merged)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
I'm just wondering what people's thoughts are on this. It seems they haven't even approached him about a new deal.
I believe that they have exchanged numbers. Either side just doesn't like what they are hearing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Is there something wrong in New England since Pioli left, these things seem to be left until the last minute. I know a lot of the players were taken aback by the trade of Seymour, this non-contact with Vince seems like a really bad idea to me.
It stinks of indecision on the part of the Patriots. Why leave this so late?
I don't see this situation unfolding any differently than Samuel, Branch, etc. Take that for what it's worth. Call is playing it safe. Call it negotiating. Call it keeping their options open. Call it not thinking the player is worth the money they want.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Is it that they are leaning towards going to a 4-3 base?
Don't know. I tend to doubt it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Has it got something to do with the CBA?
Kraft even said so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Why would we franchise the guy when its clear he wants a good long term deal
Because they can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
doesn't appear to want to break the bank either?
We don't know what Vince wants.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Would you take 1st and 2nd round picks in this years draft for him?
Absolutely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Is Myron Pryor good enough to start in 2010? I think he is well ahead of Brace.
Don't know about Pryor. Agreed on Brace.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
I'm just confused by it all really. I've no problem if they let him go, as long as they believe that Pryor is up to a starting role and they get a really good deal out of it. I would prefer if he stayed though, imo he is the best NT in the league and by a long way too as he is a 3 down guy.
Best 3/4 NT- yes. Best DT- No.
My gut tells me that they Pats don't want to play big money for a run-stuffer and will let him walk/trade him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye
Whats you thoughts and please explain to me about the CBA if its part of this.
CBA or capless year will theoretically impact market demand for the player. In 2011 and a lockout, teams may need to be cash conservative.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick
"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
Last edited by robertweathers; 02-10-2010 at 11:19 AM..
1) Wilfork is most likely gone. He won't get franchised(Pats don't do this typically)
2) No team is stupid enough to give a #1 and #2 for a NT, and I don't care if player is a perennial pro-bowler and 1st ballot HOF....NFL is a business and the draft picks are very valuable commodities
3) Pryor is a backup at best, and Brace looks to be another Marquise Hill in the making if he could not beat our Pryor last year
My gut tells me that they Pats don't want to play big money for a run-stuffer and will let him walk/trade him.
They're not going to just let him walk; Matt Cassel can attest to that.
We don't know how far apart they are; I also don't know that they could have devised an acceptable extension during the 2009 season because of the special salary cap rules in place to prevent teams from skirting the salary cap by shifting money into the uncapped years.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The unbelievable reach for Brace in the draft last year makes at least some sense now. Pats knew the chances were fairly slim that they could work out a long-term deal with Vince.
"Typically".........did we have backup options to AV or AS ?
In case of Vince there's plenty of 'bodies" albeit not as talented. There's a reason Pryor played last year(not a benchwarming rook), and there's a reason they drafted Brace in Rd 2 last year...when in fact they had Vince, Sey, Ty, Jarvis, M Wright for DL depth.