PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork? - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2010, 09:58 AM   #1
On The Game Day Roster
 
PatriotsDaily.com's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 442
Default PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

Should The Patriots Re-Sign Vince Wilfork?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
PatriotsDaily.com is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-28-2010, 10:00 AM   #2
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,289
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

I said I doubt they will and that I'd be fine with that if they could get a 1st for him.

But I'm the stupidest poster here so for PD to even write about this topic is worrisome.
SanAngeloState is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:07 AM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
The Dynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,294
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

There is no question the Pats need him on this team. If the Pats let him walk I believe it would be the biggest mistake in the BB era here in NE. I believe that the Pats should give him a long term deal, not Haynesworth type money, but enough to make him happy. The guy is only 28, give him a 5 or 6 year deal. That only brings him to 33 or 34, he definitely has 5 or 6 years left in the tank. He isnt an every down DLmen, like the article said he only plays about 50% of the snaps. If they let him walk that creates another huge need on defense, maybe even more pressing than a pass rusher. The Pats cannot afford to lose this guy and have yet another huge hole to fill on this defense.
__________________
"It is what it is" -Bill Belichick

"...as the head coach I can kind of do whatever I want. If I want to coach the punters, I can go coach the punters. If I want to watch the offensive guards, I can watch the offensive guards." - Bill Belichick
The Dynasty is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:14 AM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,466
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dynasty View Post
There is no question the Pats need him on this team. If the Pats let him walk I believe it would be the biggest mistake in the BB era here in NE. I believe that the Pats should give him a long term deal, not Haynesworth type money, but enough to make him happy. The guy is only 28, give him a 5 or 6 year deal. That only brings him to 33 or 34, he definitely has 5 or 6 years left in the tank. He isnt an every down DLmen, like the article said he only plays about 50% of the snaps. If they let him walk that creates another huge need on defense, maybe even more pressing than a pass rusher. The Pats cannot afford to lose this guy and have yet another huge hole to fill on this defense.
I agree with what you are saying. If they franchise him, they will
probably end up having to trade him for a 2011 draft pick.
Jimke is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:14 AM   #5
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,387
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

Should the Pats re-sign Wilfork? That would be like asking if we should try to breathe today. Of course they should try re-sign him. Outside of Brady, Wilfork is the most important guy on this team.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:22 AM   #6
All Pro Poster
 
PATSYLICIOUS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,236
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

Sign him up longterm maybe 6 years, backload the contract. Cut/trade him in the final year... sorry this a BEEEEZNISS
PATSYLICIOUS is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:23 AM   #7
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

For the record, I think that Wilfork is worth $10M a year. I agree that he is worth more than anyone but Brady. That being said, I don't think such a deal will be signed by the patriots without much more clarity regarding the CBA.

Also, I am not at all sure that the patriots are willing to pay Wilfork huge bucks in any case. They may be willing to have Williams/Brace or Cody/Brace. The big decision may be whether to accept a 1st or have Wilfork play his last year and have no compensation other than a 2012 3rd.
mgteich is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:23 AM   #8
On The Game Day Roster
 
Franchise12's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 284
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

we need to re- sign him. No one is more imprtant to the defense than Wilfork. Im disgusted with the thought that ron brace could potentially be the starter at the position next year. Wilfork was due a better contract years ago. since our last superbowl victory there has vbeen a disturbing trend of letting young talent that we drafted and cultivated go (Samuel, Branch, Givens, Seymour, even david thomas). sure, some of them werent as valuable to their new teams but they were valuable to US,and thats all that matters. by losing those guys we lost a valuable link to the past success of this team, hence the lack of leadership. Lets not do the same with the most valuable asset on defense, Pay him accordingly.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Franchise12 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:37 AM   #9
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

Are you disgusted with idea of Cody or Williams starting at NT next year with Brace as the backup?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise12 View Post
we need to re- sign him. No one is more imprtant to the defense than Wilfork. Im disgusted with the thought that ron brace could potentially be the starter at the position next year. Wilfork was due a better contract years ago. since our last superbowl victory there has vbeen a disturbing trend of letting young talent that we drafted and cultivated go (Samuel, Branch, Givens, Seymour, even david thomas). sure, some of them werent as valuable to their new teams but they were valuable to US,and thats all that matters. by losing those guys we lost a valuable link to the past success of this team, hence the lack of leadership. Lets not do the same with the most valuable asset on defense, Pay him accordingly.
mgteich is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 10:39 AM   #10
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,387
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: PD: SHOULD the Patriots even re-sign Wilfork?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
Are you disgusted with idea of Cody or Williams starting at NT next year with Brace as the backup?
Even though Cody has experience in this type of system, I do not want him. The questions about his work ethic and conditioning are enough for me. However, I reserve the right to change my mind as the draft nears.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should the Red Sox sign Vince Wilfork? RayClay PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 11 04-23-2006 12:32 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC