ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I was just reading Mike Reiss's always informative mailbag, and as part of the uncapped year each team is allowed to use a "transition tag". This is NOT the franchise tag, but something beyond it. I'm wondering here if the Pats might have a loophole here that would allow them to control the future of Leigh Bodden, depsite guarenteeing him they won't franchise him. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
He was easily our most solid corner, maybe not the dynamic lock-down number 1 we see in New York or Green Bay, but definitely a player that I think is worth keeping.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I was just reading Mike Reiss's always informative mailbag, and as part of the uncapped year each team is allowed to use a "transition tag". This is NOT the franchise tag, but something beyond it. I'm wondering here if the Pats might have a loophole here that would allow them to control the future of Leigh Bodden, depsite guarenteeing him they won't franchise him. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
He was easily our most solid corner, maybe not the dynamic lock-down number 1 we see in New York or Green Bay, but definitely a player that I think is worth keeping.
That would be kind of a double cross. I say get rid of him, he'll want top dollar, and he was pretty good, nothing outstanding. Lots of catches on him that I saw.
In any case, Bodden will not be playing for the patriots unless the patriots are willing to pay big bucks. I think that we should pay big bucks to Bodden, Wilfork and Mankins.
In any case, Bodden will not be playing for the patriots unless the patriots are willing to pay big bucks. I think that we should pay big bucks to Bodden, Wilfork and Mankins.
Depends on what passes for big bucks. Bodden is a good CB, but not a great one. Paying star money to guys like him is a great way to end up with a mediocre team.
I was just reading Mike Reiss's always informative mailbag, and as part of the uncapped year each team is allowed to use a "transition tag". This is NOT the franchise tag, but something beyond it. I'm wondering here if the Pats might have a loophole here that would allow them to control the future of Leigh Bodden, depsite guarenteeing him they won't franchise him. Does anyone have any clarification on this?
He was easily our most solid corner, maybe not the dynamic lock-down number 1 we see in New York or Green Bay, but definitely a player that I think is worth keeping.
It would depend on the specific language of the deal; if it applies to both franchise and transition tags.
But teams rarely use the transition tag now. Besides the Steelers using it on Max Starks recently (which made him drastically overpaid), the last teams to really use it were the Seahawks and Vikings back about four years ago, with Hutchinson and Burleson.
The problem with the transition tag is that there is no compensation for teams signing the player from you, like there is with the franchise tag (two first-round picks). Therefore teams can just poison pill you, sign the guy, and they won't have to give anything up.
In any case, Bodden will not be playing for the patriots unless the patriots are willing to pay big bucks. I think that we should pay big bucks to Bodden, Wilfork and Mankins.
No way should Bodden command big bucks, and no way should we pay him what we're going to pay Wilfork and Mankins. Bodden was solid, but he's a #2 corner. If he wants to get paid like a #1 corner, he certainly didn't play like it and will probably be let go. IMO, Butler is our cornerback of the future.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No way should Bodden command big bucks, and no way should we pay him what we're going to pay Wilfork and Mankins. Bodden was solid, but he's a #2 corner. If he wants to get paid like a #1 corner, he certainly didn't play like it and will probably be let go. IMO, Butler is our cornerback of the future.
After the 2008 season, Belichick decided that he'd get rid of his best cornerback before he could be sure that he had adequate replacements lined up for the position. The result was that Wilhite became the starter, just as he'd ended as the starter the season before, and good teams were able to pass against the Patriots pretty much whenever they needed to, just as they had the year before when the Patriots were also playing with just one starter level cornerback.
I certainly hope that Belichick has learned from that mistake.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius