NFL: 32 Fat-cat Republicans who vote Socialist - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2006, 09:43 AM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,422
Default NFL: 32 Fat-cat Republicans who vote Socialist

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...=2006601280340

The NFL means (big) business
With $5.8 billion in revenue last year, pro football is the king of sports in Detroit and the nation.
BY JOHN GALLAGHER
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

January 28, 2006

As the National Football League brings its annual Super Bowl to Detroit next week, the nation will revel in what has become America's favorite sporting event.
But peek behind the bunting of this all-American extravaganza and you'll find a financial underpinning that is, well, pretty un-American.

No matter that the Detroit version of the Super Bowl will be played in one of capitalism's greatest cities, home to some of the world's largest companies. The NFL's family secret is that for decades the league has conducted its business according to a rigidly uncompetitive share-the-wealth formula.

The NFL's 32 teams equally split most of their annual revenues. That means even mediocre teams like the Detroit Lions suffer little or no financial penality for failure on the playing field. A stringent salary cap keeps down teams' expenses.

The irony of 32 millionaire owners like the Lions' William Clay Ford agreeing to run their sport this way is lost on no one, least of all the owners themselves.

"We're 32 fat-cat Republicans who vote socialist," Baltimore Ravens owner Art Modell quipped a few years ago.

Outsiders can only marvel at the league's success.

"Revenue sharing has led to every team having a good shot at winning and that generates competitive balance," says Phil Porter, a professor of sports economics at the University of South Florida.

"So you've got fan interest in every market in the game because in any year, anybody can win. That drives the demand side, and then you've got cost containment because you've got a salary cap. That's a great way to run a league."

NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue makes no apologies for the league's share-the-wealth formula. In a world of iPods, DVDs, 24-hour cable and other forms of entertainment, it's the NFL against the world.

"This kind of revenue sharing is inconsistent with the manner in which independent economic competitors conduct themselves," Tagliabue acknowledged before Congress a few years back. "It is the way business partners conduct themselves, seeking to compete not with each other, but with other outside, independent competitors in the marketplace."

Make no mistake, this system pays big-time. The NFL is America's richest sport. Lucrative TV revenues, worth more than $3.7 billion a year to the league, make up most of the bounty. So do the many new stadiums like Ford Field that communities help to build to keep or attract an NFL team.

Thanks to those factors, the NFL's total revenues have soared to $5.8 billion in 2005, up from $970 million in 1989, the year Tagliabue took over the league's front office.

The league's 32 teams share the television and radio money, revenue from national sponsorships and a portion of all ticket sales. Teams get to keep their parking and concession revenue and money from sales of luxury suites and stadium naming rights.
Under revenue sharing, each team got $87.5 million from TV revenue during 2005. Since the league's salary cap for 2005 was $85.5 million, the 32 owners almost have a built-in profit.

"The way the NFL is set up, an owner really has to work at it to lose money," Gene Upshaw, executive director of the NFL Players Association, said recently in an interview.

Most valuable sport

To show just how odd the NFL's economics can be, consider this: The doormat Detroit Lions franchise is valued by Forbes magazine at $780 million. That makes the Lions more valuable than the Pistons, the Tigers or the Red Wings. The Lions, in fact, are worth almost as much as those three Motor City professional teams combined, according to Forbes' calculations.

Here's another indicator of NFL dominance: The least-valuable pro football team, the Minnesota Vikings, is worth more ($658 million) than the most valuable pro basketball team, the New York Knicks ($543 million), according to Forbes' estimates.

The NFL's markers of success are everywhere. The Harris Poll reported in December that 33% of Americans name pro football their favorite sport, a wide and increasing margin. Just 14% of Americans now say pro baseball, the next highest, is their favorite sport, the poll found.

Moreover, 20 of the NFL's 32 teams have gotten new or substantially renovated stadiums since 1992, and four more stadiums are in the works. New stadiums typically increase attendance and sales of luxury suites and concessions, a boon to the bottom line.

Even in this monetary paradise, though, some cracks have appeared. The league needs to negotiate a new collective-bargaining agreement soon with its players, who naturally want to share more in the league's wealth.

And the issue of unshared revenues, coming from local teams' share of ticket sales, concessions and so forth, has become an issue. Richer teams want to share less with poorer teams. The league needs to resolve the dispute or risk letting greed spoil things for everybody.

Contact JOHN GALLAGHER at 313-222-5173 or gallagher@freepress.com.
Copyright © 2005 Detroit Free Press Inc.
mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-28-2006, 09:52 AM   #2
All Pro Poster
 
RayClay's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,645
My Mood: Amused
Default

Yeah, Capitalism is real proud of Detroit!
__________________
Quote:
WE ARE BUILDING A TEAM, NOT COLLECTING TALENT
RayClay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 09:56 AM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
CTPatsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: No Class, USA
Posts: 1,367
My Mood: Grumpy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RayClay
Yeah, Capitalism is real proud of Detroit!
That's what you get when you build $ hit nobody wants.
__________________
Relegated to LURKER status thanks to work.

18 year STH, although games are fewer and farther between.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
CTPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 10:13 AM   #4
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 74
Default No kidding, not true

We're fortunate the NFL understands capitalism and markets better than John Gallagher. He's probably going to followup with an enlightening article about how Delmonte subsidizes advertising for carrots with revenue from corn sales.

What a 'tard. The nfl teams compete on the field, but the league competes with other entertainment products.

Revenue sharing makes that product (nfl) more attractive. More revenue to share. Economics 101 and *very* American.
len_mullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 10:32 AM   #5
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by len_mullen
We're fortunate the NFL understands capitalism and markets better than John Gallagher. He's probably going to followup with an enlightening article about how Delmonte subsidizes advertising for carrots with revenue from corn sales.

What a 'tard. The nfl teams compete on the field, but the league competes with other entertainment products.

Revenue sharing makes that product (nfl) more attractive. More revenue to share. Economics 101 and *very* American.

Within capitalism itself, you have all sorts of other subcultures. You have an American model where the CEO makes 100x the average worker, and you have the Japanese model where the CEO makes 10x the average worker. pigs will be pigs, but in the NFL it's pretty evident that the most successful franchise of the new century is a guy who prefers the Japanese model. Pay for play, and you remain accountable. You have a bigger middle class than anyone else (Patriots have more players making at least $1.5 million than any other team in the league) and thus you have more depth, and really the game is all about depth.
upstater1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 10:56 AM   #6
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,647
My Mood: Devilish
Default

Mikey, why did you have to start this thread with a political statement.

This is the Football board, you know. Are you really that stupid?

Judging from you other post that had politcal overtones, the answer is yes.

TGIC just got suspended for two weeks. I think it would be good to suspend anyone who makes a political statement on the football board to be suspended for two weeks.

We are all Patriots fans, united in that. Bringing politics on the football board is poison that we don't need. Most of the past threeads that had political statements have turned out badly.
PATSNUTme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 11:33 AM   #7
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATSNUTme
Mikey, why did you have to start this thread with a political statement.

This is the Football board, you know. Are you really that stupid?

Judging from you other post that had politcal overtones, the answer is yes.

TGIC just got suspended for two weeks. I think it would be good to suspend anyone who makes a political statement on the football board to be suspended for two weeks.

We are all Patriots fans, united in that. Bringing politics on the football board is poison that we don't need. Most of the past threeads that had political statements have turned out badly.
It's a business article about the NFL, I think it's A-OK here.
Pujo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 11:39 AM   #8
Minuteman Target
 
Mike the Brit's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATSNUTme
Mikey, why did you have to start this thread with a political statement.

This is the Football board, you know. Are you really that stupid?

Judging from you other post that had politcal overtones, the answer is yes.

TGIC just got suspended for two weeks. I think it would be good to suspend anyone who makes a political statement on the football board to be suspended for two weeks.

We are all Patriots fans, united in that. Bringing politics on the football board is poison that we don't need. Most of the past threeads that had political statements have turned out badly.
What's up, PNM?

Like you, I leave politics here to those with asbestos undergarments who want to take their chances in the political forum.

But all Mikey did was quote Art Modell. And the NFL is largely about money and how it is distributed. If you think that that is "political" then you are going to have a problem with anyone who wants to discuss its rights and wrongs. Plainly, you're in a minority there -- all the threads about the CBA and hold-outs, etc.

Is something else eating you? (By the way, you are calling for someone to be suspended for two weeks because Terry Glenn is a Cowgirl got suspended for that length of time -- in fact he was suspended for three days).
__________________
My prized possessions: Our family pictures; my dad and me getting doused by Bruschi in Super Bowl XXXIX [Shalize Manza Young Up Close with ... Bill Belichick]


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


They say what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Well, Pats fans should be invincible by now. [Fitzy, 16 November 2009]

Still here to learn
Mike the Brit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 01:42 PM   #9
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Seymour93's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: TEXAS, home of the world famous TEXAS RANGERS
Posts: 5,681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike the Brit
What's up, PNM?

Like you, I leave politics here to those with asbestos undergarments who want to take their chances in the political forum.

But all Mikey did was quote Art Modell. And the NFL is largely about money and how it is distributed. If you think that that is "political" then you are going to have a problem with anyone who wants to discuss its rights and wrongs. Plainly, you're in a minority there -- all the threads about the CBA and hold-outs, etc.

Is something else eating you? (By the way, you are calling for someone to be suspended for two weeks because Terry Glenn is a Cowgirl got suspended for that length of time -- in fact he was suspended for three days).
PNM's diatribe was the classic case of posting before reading the whole thread.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Seymour93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 02:20 PM   #10
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 
PATSNUTme's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 14,647
My Mood: Devilish
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seymour93
PNM's diatribe was the classic case of posting before reading the whole thread.
I did read the whole article before I posted. Just because Modell, one of the dumbest owner ever, makes a stupid statement as part of the article, does Mikey have to take that one statement as a title of his thread? NO, he doesn't.

Look, I didn't come to this board for politics. And, the football board should be clean of politics.

The premise of Mikey's title quote is wrong anyway. Yes, the owners are rich, but there are more than a couple who do not belong to the party in the title.
PATSNUTme is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC