The homestretch: What adjustments would you make for December/playoffs - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2009, 01:01 AM   #11
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 364
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dynasty View Post
2. Our OL play particuarly defending the pass rush has been very good all season with the exception of week 2 and this week. Last week we were praising our OL play
Well except when Mathis was abusing Kaczur at the end of the Colts game leading to the Pats 2nd half collapse

Quote:
3. Again our secondary has been very good all year long for the most part besides today. You have to rememeber how young we are.
It's been a lot better than it was tonight, but it was hardly "very good" or even "good" vs. Denver or the 2nd half vs. Indy and they haven't played a strong passing team outside of those 3 games. The secondary isn't bad, but I don't think it can hang with a good or great offense. Unfortunately to hoist the Lombardi the Pats will most likely need to beat Indy and either New Orleans or Minnesota. All 3 teams are capable of shredding the Pats secondary and 2 of them have already shown they can score at will against New England.
mcmurtry86 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 12-01-2009, 01:05 AM   #12
In the Starting Line-up
 
The Dynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,294
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcmurtry86 View Post
Well except when Mathis was abusing Kaczur at the end of the Colts game leading to the Pats 2nd half collapse



It's been a lot better than it was tonight, but it was hardly "very good" or even "good" vs. Denver or the 2nd half vs. Indy and they haven't played a strong passing team outside of those 3 games. The secondary isn't bad, but I don't think it can hang with a good or great offense. Unfortunately to hoist the Lombardi the Pats will most likely need to beat Indy and either New Orleans or Minnesota. All 3 teams are capable of shredding the Pats secondary and 2 of them have already shown they can score at will against New England.
The overall OL play in the Colts game was very good. Brady had plenty of time to find his WR's and didnt have to worry about moving around in the pocket.

The secondary did hang with a good/great offense just a few weeks ago vs the Colts. For 3 quarters they kept a dominant offensive in check. They showed that they are capable in stopping a powerful offense they just need to play a full game.
__________________
"It is what it is" -Bill Belichick

"...as the head coach I can kind of do whatever I want. If I want to coach the punters, I can go coach the punters. If I want to watch the offensive guards, I can watch the offensive guards." - Bill Belichick
The Dynasty is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:12 AM   #13
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Brady_12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 494
My Mood: Cheerful
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dynasty View Post
For 3 quarters they kept a dominant offensive in check. They showed that they are capable in stopping a powerful offense they just need to play a full game.
I would have settled for 3 qrtrs tonight. We might have had a shot.
Brady_12 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:16 AM   #14
In the Starting Line-up
 
The Dynasty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,294
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brady_12 View Post
I would have settled for 3 qrtrs tonight. We might have had a shot.
Yeah, so would I. No one on the Pats came to play tonight, no one.
__________________
"It is what it is" -Bill Belichick

"...as the head coach I can kind of do whatever I want. If I want to coach the punters, I can go coach the punters. If I want to watch the offensive guards, I can watch the offensive guards." - Bill Belichick
The Dynasty is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:20 AM   #15
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,329
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

on O they need to get the ball to moss at the start of the game and not a 60 yerd bomb but how about a screen to him

and stop throwing so many deep ball's when guy's are coverd brady keep's forceing the ball to much its only geting them INT's and lots of 3 and out's

they need to use the TE's more and the WR's not named moss and welker need to see the ball because good team's will find a way to stop welker and moss like the saints did tonight

and when maroney is haveing a good game keep giveing him the ball

on D will they need to stop puting AD to cover TE's and use him only as a pass rusher and ever down put him at OLB or DE and let him do just one thing get to the QB

they have DB's that can cover a TE.... AD is the only passrusher they have with some speed let him use it

the D line i think they need to play the 4-3 more cause they are geting blown off the ball

and where has mayo been its he's job to stuff all dose wide open hole's that the saints RB's where running through

but there is not much they can do on D not much talent on that side of the ball i think the vrabel and seymour trade is realy hurting them a lot

seymour was there best run stoper and best passrusher

and vrabel was not the same player he was but i still think he is better then burgess
patsfan-1982 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:23 AM   #16
Rookie
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 38
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dynasty View Post
Yeah, so would I. No one on the Pats came to play tonight, no one.
Maybe they just chalked this one up and were already looking towards next week
goldspeed101 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:28 AM   #17
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,329
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldspeed101 View Post
Maybe they just chalked this one up and were already looking towards next week
why whould you chalk up a win AT a 10-0 team to look at the 5-6 fish ?

they just got beat by a better team the pats are not a top team any more and the saints are thats it
patsfan-1982 is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:49 AM   #18
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
patsinthesnow's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,500
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Thats what happens when you pass on Barwin, Cushing, and Matthews.

Truth hurts, Bill
patsinthesnow is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:55 AM   #19
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,637
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

Keep doing similar things. The shotgun has served us well - scoring has rarely been a problem. It didn't go well on Monday night, but it'll be back.

Owners fire coaches. But, in the end, players lose games. Players lost this one. They didn't play well. In some cases, they aren't as good as we thought.

Sure, coach Gruden talked about scheming a lot... but NO had the personnel to do what thye wanted.

I would say, let's get to the playoffs and see what happens. If it is nothing, then they are who we thought they were (thanks Green).
farn is offline  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:19 AM   #20
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
convertedpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 3,073
Default Re: The Homestretch. What Adjustments Would You Make for December/Playoffs

I agree that the shotgun is overused. I know Brady is more comfortable out of it, but it's one thing to use it, it's another to rely on it. I'd like to see more balance with the packages, though I wouldn't go so far as to say almost all plays should be run from under center.

The OL was awful last night. Part of it was Light coming back, part of it was Kaczur sucking, but they were allowing consistent pressure on 3-man rushes. I even saw the back chip a few times with only 3 rushers and still they got near Brady. I like the idea of Vollmer replacing Kaczur, or Vollmer taking the LT spot and moving Light over to RT.

Offensive play-calling, I don't have a problem with the individual play-calls. But as Payton showed us last night, when you have a talented OC, you use plays to not only gain yards, but set up plays down the line. Throw the screen one way, then later on in the game, fake it, and throw it down the field. I haven't seen too many efforts from the Pats offense to take advantage of a defense based on previous plays. Like one person wrote last night, we're playing checkers, they're playing chess.

Wilhite needs to sit. Not much more to say about that.

And as for the defense, I understand the bend-but-don't-break philosophy, but it's not working. The red zone defense is atrocious. There's no pass rush, so 3rd downs are easily converted. And last night they started giving up the huge play as well. So basically, the things it should stop, it isn't stopping. So I think there are a lot of things we can talk about defensively, but the bottom line is I think pretty much any suggestion would be an improvement right now.
convertedpatsfan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would you rather Pats not make playoffs or lose in playoffs/SB? tombonneau PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 29 12-30-2008 02:55 PM
I'm excited to see Hobbs make adjustments... patsox23 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 6 08-25-2005 10:10 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566