CampPen33

Can't find anyone talking about this, but I WAS FUMING over that penalty. My wife took my kid for a walk.

Anyone else think it was BS? They were facing, looking at, and GOING AFTER the ball. AND the receiver didn't even go back into him at all.

I really kind felt like the calls going to Indy in the past may be something that I really imagine, but it was CLEARLY favoring Indy last night. Bogus.

The_Riddler

Welcome to Bill Polian's inner circle, would you like some Koolaid ?

CampPen33

I am quite parched.

MrBigglesWorth

i there a youtube clip of this?

__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers

Patriot Missile

From one Pats fan to another it was clearly pass intereference. I don't know how this has become an issue.

MrBigglesWorth

ha ha... i guess it's a matter or perspective and interpretation

__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers

CampPen33

I really don't think so.

ausbacker

Yeah, it must be frustrating as a defender that you can be running with the receiver, turn around to spot the ball and the receiver instigate contact by jumping into you and be flagged for defensive PI.

upstater1

I don't think it was pass interference and I was more stunned that the ref through the flag 5 minutes after the ball hit the turf.

However, it wasn't as bad as the call against Hobbs a few years ago or th non-call on Caldwell.

Patriot Missile

I agree with you 100% and had Butler made a play for the ball it may not of been called.