Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2009, 09:57 AM   #41
Is Sizzlin
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 14,466
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PATRIOTSFANINPA View Post
You know Wilfork is saying to himself..."keep sucking Brace" more $$$$$ in my pocket and I stay in NE as well

The longer it takes Brace to become a servicable NFL player the more money big Vince will probably get.
This is just pure fallacy on your part. It shows a complete lack of understanding of the bigger picture and what it means to bring players along.

Wilfork isn't going to get Albert Haynesworth money and your kidding yourself if you think otherwise.

Brace's productivity has no bearing on Wilfork's contract status. None. The Pats switching to the 4-3 as their primary base saw to that...

People seem to forget that it takes 3 years for a player to fully develop. People like yourself need instant gratification from picks or you consider them busts, but all it does is show your lack of understanding.
DaBruinz is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 206

Updated 2/4/10

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-04-2009, 10:13 AM   #42
We salute you...
 
ForThoseAboutToRock's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 327
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
Here's an honest question: can you think of any BB-era Pats rookie, at any position except QB & OL, who spend a significant chunk of his rookie year as a healthy scratch but ended up a starter?
Brace's career thus far is reminiscent of Marquise Hill, though I don't recall whether he was a healthy scratch or merely didn't see the field.


I'd guess that Brace's healthy scratches have to do with the need for players to fill ST's slots. Pat Chung has seen the field primarily because he was a ST'er until recently. Perhaps Brace's turn to step up will soon arrive and this topic will go to rest.
ForThoseAboutToRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:24 AM   #43
Conveniently prepackaged.
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,592
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
There's plenty of time yet for Brace, but the string of inactive games certainly isn't a GOOD sign.
That's taking the negative potential of the situation a bit too firmly to heart for me. Prior to Training Camp, if one had to assess areas Brace could most greatly improve, what might those be? For my guess I'd say:
-- Conditioning
-- Quickness
-- Technique

PatfanKen noted how Brace was getting off the snap slower a couple days into Training Camp. At Training Camp speeds he was adequate, but he clearly needed better conditioning and while your at it, let's see what can be done to improve his burst (quickness + power off the snap for those who may not be following this too closely). In a "normal" year Brace might rotate with Wilfork, but let's face it, this is not a normal 3-4 season, it's more hybrid between 3-4, 4-3, Nickel, & Dime - obviously there's been a slightly greater emphasis on pass defense with a DL emphasis on collapsing the pocket rather than sprinting off the edge.

While it might be nice to get Ron on the field taking a few snaps, someone needs to be inactive each game. If he's working with Coaches Woicik and Nash on strength, conditioning, speed, quickness, and flexibility, and he's working with Coach Johnson on technique, reading blocks, and understanding how the different blocking techniques and assignments relate to the types of plays he's defending...I call that good for NE, and himself - long term.

Coming into the draft Brace was considered one dimensional, a run stuffer with limited mobility to move laterally and no penetration of the backfield to disrupt passing plays. BB prefers DL who can play a more flexible game - recall the surprise on this forum when Training Camp reports noted Brace lining up at DE in the 4-3. You have to think he might be trying to learn a bit more than NT duties.

At #40 a number of "experts" felt Brace might be overdrafted, but just as drafting a rehabbing Tate was an exercise in patience, so too might have been drafting young master Brace. Myron Pryor has been a very pleasant surprise, most of us felt he was destined for the Practice Squad if he even was retained. His success creates a different measuring stick - Marquis Hill drafted #63 overall played in one game his rookie season, I think we can give fellow second rounder Brace a little more benefit of the doubt.

Brace has been active for 3 games, he has one tackle. His more highly touted counterpart at BC has been active for 5 games, he has eight tackles. I think the dollar to tackle ratio might be equal.
__________________
"Vampire penguins? Zombie guinea pigs? We're done for.... done for."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


J-E-T-S Mommy! Mommy! Mommy!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:31 AM   #44
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seacoast NH
Posts: 10,384
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForThoseAboutToRock View Post
Brace's career thus far is reminiscent of Marquise Hill, though I don't recall whether he was a healthy scratch or merely didn't see the field.

I'd guess that Brace's healthy scratches have to do with the need for players to fill ST's slots. Pat Chung has seen the field primarily because he was a ST'er until recently. Perhaps Brace's turn to step up will soon arrive and this topic will go to rest.
Reminds me a bit of Hill too. Many here defended Hill (correctly) arguing that Hill simply couldn't crack the lineup of quality starters in the 3 man DL. True, but when Hill got the rare chance because of temporary injury to play a few series I always focused on him. He did not do well, at all.

That said, Brace is seemingly targeted at Wilfie's job. Wilfork has been relatively healthy and playing well so that should not be held against Brace. And as mentioned ST play is the sina quo non for young Pats players who aren't starters. With the wedge verboten (ask SeaBass) big fat loads like Brace have no roll (sic) on STs.


What concerned me most about Brace was BB signing and then playing JAG Sands for 2 games with Brace inactive. Reasonable people should just watch as the season unfolds. If Brace is mostly MIA all season then he'll be a very interesting guy to follow in detail in next summer's training camp. Me, I'm hopefull that he's just a slow starter.
__________________
Never give up - Never surrender...by Grabthar’s hammer… by the Sons of Warvan… you shall be avenged. You shall be avenged!
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:34 AM   #45
Conveniently prepackaged.
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,592
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah View Post
Reminds me a bit of Hill too. Many here defended Hill (correctly) arguing that Hill simply couldn't crack the lineup of quality starters in the 3 man DL. True, but when Hill got the rare chance because of temporary injury to play a few series I always focused on him. He did not do well, at all.

That said, Brace is seemingly targeted at Wilfie's job. Wilfork has been relatively healthy and playing well so that should not be held against Brace. And as mentioned ST play is the sina quo non for young Pats players who aren't starters. With the wedge verboten (ask SeaBass) big fat loads like Brace have no roll (sic) on STs.


What concerned me most about Brace was BB signing and then playing JAG Sands for 2 games with Brace inactive. Reasonable people should just watch as the season unfolds. If Brace is mostly MIA all season then he'll be a very interesting guy to follow in detail in next summer's training camp. Me, I'm hopefull that he's just a slow starter.
Well, at 6'8" the dainty Mr. Sands was quite effective against the run inside, and an additional bit of clutter in the throwing lanes.
__________________
"Vampire penguins? Zombie guinea pigs? We're done for.... done for."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


J-E-T-S Mommy! Mommy! Mommy!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:35 AM   #46
In the Starting Line-up
 
Oswlek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
To be fair, Brandon Meriweather has made the active 45 for every single game of his career. People also like to compare Brace to Ty Warren "starting slowly," but Warren also played 16 games as a rookie, and started 4 of them.

Of course it's silly hyperbole to call a guy a "bust" after 7 games. But it's also unrealistic to pretend that Brace is following a perfectly normal development path and is just buried by a deep roster. Remember, for one of his inactive games, Terdell Sands made the 45 instead.

Brandon McGowan was a bargain-basement signing late in free agency who looked like a long shot to crack a safety roster that included 2 returning starters and the team's top draft pick. He's now entrenched as a starter. Darius Butler was looking up at Bodden, Wilhite and Springs, but he's already drawn a starting assignment. Etc. If Brace were looking impressive, it's fair to assume he'd be on the field.

No panic here, but some modest disappointment seems fair.
The Meriweather and Warren comparisons aren't perfectly apt from the direction you are coming. Warren was a complete need pick. NE had Seymour, Hamilton and Washington above him. Of course he would be active, he was the primary backup at DE. I think it is fair to question whether he would be active with the group NE has now. Also, Warren's starts came after Washington got hurt and they ceased the minute Big Ted returned.

Meriweather came in during a similar time. NE had Rodney and Wilson, both of which who were health risks, and Sanders who was still growing into his role even in his 3rd year. Sanders hadn't proven much yet and Wilson had proven he would never be the same as he was in 03 and 04. With the 2009 BMs and Sanders in front of him, it is likely that Meriweather would be progressing similarly to Chung... and Brace.

NE's DL right now is ridiculously deep. Warren, Green, Wilfork, Wright, Pryor. Then factor in that NE is in a speed nickle more often than not which means TBC and Burgess are in a DE role very often as well. Just look at the snaps even NE's big guys are getting. Wilfork is in on about 50% of the snaps - and he is NE's most dynamic DL by far who could easily play more if necessary.

Brace is simply caught in a numbers game. Even before the season started it was pretty clear that one of Pryor or Brace would get minimal snaps or even be inactive. Pryor just happens to be the better player at this point. No shame in that. Judging from Brace's performance in the preseason, it is equally clear that the guy can play in this league. Frankly, he was quite a bit more athletic and disruptive than advertised. Despite the healthy scratches, I fully expect him to be at least a Jarvis Green type primary backup by next season.
__________________
"They have one objective," said Washington cornerback Shawn Springs. "They whoop people's [backsides]. If you understand that, it answers all your questions. They might not lose [this year]."

Last edited by Oswlek; 11-04-2009 at 10:40 AM.
Oswlek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:38 AM   #47
In the Starting Line-up
 
Oswlek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForThoseAboutToRock View Post
Brace's career thus far is reminiscent of Marquise Hill, though I don't recall whether he was a healthy scratch or merely didn't see the field.


I'd guess that Brace's healthy scratches have to do with the need for players to fill ST's slots. Pat Chung has seen the field primarily because he was a ST'er until recently. Perhaps Brace's turn to step up will soon arrive and this topic will go to rest.
I don't see the Hill comparison at all. Brace showed more in his rookie preseason than Hill did in his entire career. From everything I've read about the guy he was a standup individual and he deserves to RIP, but he was a terrible football player.
__________________
"They have one objective," said Washington cornerback Shawn Springs. "They whoop people's [backsides]. If you understand that, it answers all your questions. They might not lose [this year]."
Oswlek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:39 AM   #48
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
PatsWickedPissah's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seacoast NH
Posts: 10,384
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks View Post
Well, at 6'8" the dainty Mr. Sands was quite effective against the run inside, and an additional bit of clutter in the throwing lanes.
Given that exceptional height and weight there has to be a notable fatal aspect to the guy for him not to make any NFL roster.
__________________
Never give up - Never surrender...by Grabthar’s hammer… by the Sons of Warvan… you shall be avenged. You shall be avenged!
PatsWickedPissah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:45 AM   #49
We salute you...
 
ForThoseAboutToRock's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 327
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oswlek View Post
I don't see the Hill comparison at all. Brace showed more in his rookie preseason than Hill did in his entire career. From everything I've read about the guy he was a standup individual and he deserves to RIP, but he was a terrible football player.
Well, then I stand corrected. I don't remember Marquise Hill during his rookie preseason. I just remember that he was a 2nd rounder who hardly ever saw the field and may or may not have been a healthy scratch at times.
ForThoseAboutToRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:45 AM   #50
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,513
Default Re: ESPN Insider already declaring Ron Brace a bust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
I
There is no excuse for this. Myron Pryor is making this guy look really bad.
Maybe Myron Pryor is just really good for a rookie? You ever think that?
Synovia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ESPN Insider Top 100 mayoclinic Patriots Draft Talk 0 08-27-2009 03:35 PM
Espn insider KevinFaulk-33 The PatsFans.com Pub 0 12-30-2008 02:11 PM
ESPN \"Insider\" Debate BradysButtBoy PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 16 08-04-2005 02:27 PM
ESPN Insider: Anyone have access? khayos PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 07-20-2005 08:07 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444