eagle eye

If you put all them receivers together on one depth chart Moss and Welker would be playing every snap. I'd say Edelman would be at no.4/5 on what he has done this year. Tate is the dark horse here, I'd give you a certain answer in a couple of weeks hopefully.

But the no.1 and 2 are Moss and Welker no doubt so I'd say right now that there is no comparison.

__________________
Fun fight game, no expertise needed and free with no catches

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

FreeTedWilliams

I have to agree, this guy routinely makes plays. He has something like 5 TD plays of over 50 yards, this year alone.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Iron Helmet

My feeling is Philly has a slight edge in talent over the Pats WRs Corp, as of today. If Tate shows us something in the coming weeks, he can tip the balance in our favor.

I think the 2009 version of D. Jackson is 95% of the game changer on the field that the 2009 version of Moss is, and if Edelman can give us 75% of Welker, than a healthy Kevin Curtis can come close to 100%. The the 3 spot, would be Aiken vs. Maclin, and I like Maclin. Not to mention Brady is an upgrade over McNabb throwing, which should translate into better performances than we are seeing from them now.

I am assuming that all their recievers can get on the same page as Tom/System, which, as we have seen, can be very difficult.

I am hoping Tate lives up to the billing as a first round talent. This would change lots.

Stranger

Philly may be deeper, especially considering our injuries and the complete failure of Galloway, however, our top two guys, Moss in particular, make up for the lack of depth.

Moss commands double teams and makes things easier for everyone else. Defensive coordinators must scheme specifically around him. How quickly we forget how special he is.

As soon as the Pats get healthier (Moss, Welker, Tate, Edelman, Aiken and Ben Watson) I think you'll see that wide open 5 wide passing attack start to really click.

Would you swap WR corps with the Philly's at the beginning of training camp? Are the Pats a better more dangerous team assuming everyone stays healthy?

Nunchucks

Don't sleep on Jackson, right now, he might be better than moss.

Maclin is solid for a rookie, but Welker has the resume and production behind him.

The rest are blah

VJCPatriot

Moss and Welker are better than the Eagles' top 2. However depth wise the Eagles have more talent at WR. Tate is still an unknown. Aiken is serviceable but his main impact is on ST.

__________________

HarkDawg

• 10 DeSean Jackson PR
• 18 Jeremy Maclin


are best for their ages. Both are young deep threats.



Overall I take the PATS Package

1.More Intelligent and Better QB
2 Pats have better options for underneath roots
3. Randy Moss is still a deep threat.
4. Tate has the potential to be a solid deep threat.



Combining both slot and wide receivers PATS are better overall

add the QB to the equation.... it is a no brainier PATS FTW


love PHILLY's youth thou

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

HarkDawg

QB is the x factor and it determines the outcome of y. McNabb is no Brady. He lacks the pedigree of a dominant QB

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

BradyFTW!

... no. He isn't/

Deus Irae

__________________
When it comes to the Koolaid, take sips not chugs.

There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.