ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Josh McDaniels is probably the best ex-coordinator to leave the Belichick tree. He is clearly smart, knowledgeable, has great game plans, and assembled a record scoring offense. He will in all likelihood have the best HC career of any ex-Pats coaches.
However, his biggest achilles heel is similar to why the Pats beat Mike Martz in 2001: stubborn insistence on execution, in the face of obstacles. This is why we lost in 2007 to an inferior Giants team, and why we never won the big one with McKid at the controls:
“It is going to come down to whoever tackles better, who blocks better, who throws better, who catches better,” McDaniels said. “It is not going to be a big game of tricks and gimmicks, I don’t think. I think they are going to know plenty of what we are doing, if not all, and we are probably going to know a lot about what they are doing. It is going to come down to whose players play the best and who can make the plays and avoid the big mistakes in the game, like most games come down to. I don’t think this game is going to be about deception. I think it is going to be about us trying to play good football, and they are going to do the same thing. Whoever plays better on Sunday will win the game.”
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I still don't get the point of saying "Who ever plays better on Sunday will win"? What a great nugget of insight, the team that wins will have played better, thus, who ever plays better... will win! Genius.
__________________
This is the year. We put our failures in the past, it's a new year, a new defense. It's time to prove to the league that the Patriots are back and aren't going anywhere and they will be the last ones standing in Feb.
Update: Well that didn't work out as I had planned. Next year baby, next year 19-0 we go. Next year.
Josh McDaniels is probably the best ex-coordinator to leave the Belichick tree. He is clearly smart, knowledgeable, has great game plans, and assembled a record scoring offense. He will in all likelihood have the best HC career of any ex-Pats coaches.
However, his biggest achilles heel is similar to why the Pats beat Mike Martz in 2001: stubborn insistence on execution, in the face of obstacles. This is why we lost in 2007 to an inferior Giants team, and why we never won the big one with McKid at the controls:
I don't necessarilly disagree with you but that's not what I glean from McDaniels comments.
He's simply sending a message to his team to focus on their jobs and execute. The Patriots themselves lose when they do that, as they almost did against the Bills and did against the Jets.
Its good advice and prompts the team to worry less about their opponent and more about themselves and their roles.
I still don't get the point of saying "Who ever plays better on Sunday will win"? What a great nugget of insight, the team that wins will have played better, thus, who ever plays better... will win! Genius.
It is akin to whoever wants it more
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Belichick says cliche stuff like this too, however he says a ton of other bland stuff in his press conferences that he doesn't necessarily believe. McDaniels sounds like he really does believe in winning by out-executing, no gimmicks as he says, or deception, just out-play the other team even if they know what you're doing.
The funny thing is if you posted McDaniels' comment and attributed it to Belichick, no one would have questioned it. In fact, I think Belichick could sue McDaniels for plagiarism for the quote. I don't see anything wrong with the quote, but I guess it is because I have been reading and hearing Belichick saying much of the same thing for nearly a decade.
Belichick says cliche stuff like this too, however he says a ton of other bland stuff in his press conferences that he doesn't necessarily believe. McDaniels sounds like he really does believe in winning by out-executing, no gimmicks as he says, or deception, just out-play the other team even if they know what you're doing.
You mean you don't have to out exceute to win?!? Nothing like making your own opinion about what McDaniels was thinking based on your own bias against him. I seriously doubt McDaniels is going to put vanilla offenses and defenses out there. Besides, gimmicks are gimmicks. Rarely do gimmicks win games. Gimmicks are overrated and the Dolphins are proof this year that gimmicks only work so much. In fact, deception is a bit overrated.
McDaniels isn't going to come out of the gate and throw it 40 times with Kyle Orton as his QB. He's going to balance the playcalling. If you've seen a Denver game this season, you'd know that. Other than stating the obvious, I'm not sure where discussion is going to come from in this thread.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I would hope a coach would focus on execution in the face of obstacles.
Not when the only obstacle some here ever consider is playcalling... They'd have executed perfectly against any defense if he called the right play, when he calls the wrong play execution doesn't matter...it's his fault.