Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2009, 11:59 PM   #11
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,321
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
Actually, that's not correct. The Patriots take the (or perhaps "a") player that, over the life of the contract, would give them the most utility (in an economic sense), and need is a factor in that decision. If that weren't the case, the Patriots would have drafted Brady long before #199; by their own admission, Brady was already the top player left on their draft board long before they did select him.
i dont think thats a good argument because brady was not a need (drew bledsoe) was set as the starting QB and if it was not for Mo Lewis all most killing him brady would not have played in 2001

and you just said it your self brady was the best player left on there bord thats not drafting for need

but i do get what your saying they dont just draft the best player on the bord sometimes they do go for need like mayo maybe he was the best guy on the bord but he was a big need

Last edited by patsfan-1982; 10-08-2009 at 12:04 AM..
patsfan-1982 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-08-2009, 12:02 AM   #12
Totally Full of It
 
Wildo7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,836
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

The Pats most certainly drafted for need last year and the year before.

Last edited by Wildo7; 10-08-2009 at 12:03 AM..
Wildo7 is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 12:17 AM   #13
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,581
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan-1982 View Post
and you just said it your self brady was the best player left on there bord thats not drafting for need
Except you're missing my point: if selecting the "best fit in the system" were the sole criterion, and need plays no role, how could they possibly pass on Brady as many times as they did? Once I could see, but over and over again?
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 12:27 AM   #14
Banned
 
Terry Glenn is a cowgirl's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,883
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Pats drafted for need AND for the best player.

Chew on THAT for awhile...
Terry Glenn is a cowgirl is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 12:35 AM   #15
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Use the 3 #1 picks and the 4 #2 picks to put together a package that nets Calvin Johnson.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 12:36 AM   #16
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patspsycho's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 20 minutes from Foxboro
Posts: 9,930
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan-1982 View Post
i dont think thats a good argument because brady was not a need (drew bledsoe) was set as the starting QB and if it was not for Mo Lewis all most killing him brady would not have played in 2001

and you just said it your self brady was the best player left on there bord thats not drafting for need

but i do get what your saying they dont just draft the best player on the bord sometimes they do go for need like mayo maybe he was the best guy on the bord but he was a big need
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
The Pats most certainly drafted for need last year and the year before.

I could argue that the CB situation was just as much of a need as the LB situation was when they had that #10 pick for '08, and the best talent that was out there that fit their system was Mayo who was an ILB. They could easily have gone after a CB, SS, or OLB.
Patspsycho is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 05:40 AM   #17
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,464
My Mood: Cheerful
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

A WR like Julio Jones would be great - if the Pats can get him he could end up being the replacement for Moss, big & physical from what I've seen of him this year.
Big-T is online now  
Old 10-08-2009, 06:05 AM   #18
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Longmeadow, MA
Posts: 238
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

-I think drafting a QB in the First Round in 2011 is way too early. First, lets assume Brady plays until he's 38. That would mean this drafted QB (for argument's sake, Jimmy Clausen, Ryan Mallett, or Jake Locker) would sit behind Brady for at least 3 years. I don't know about you guys, but I don't want a Favre/Rodgers type situation (I don't means any absurd retirement issue w/ Brady, but just the strain of having an impatient guy seemingly "rushing" Brady into the sunset, or worse to a West Coast team).
More importantly, with a new rookie wage scale that most of us hope will be in place for the projected top-ten Raiders pick in 2011, there will probably be a rule that limits the length of rookie contracts, probably to 3-4 years, as the players union and agents will want some give back for the lesser dollar numbers. As a result of that, our waiting-in-the-wings QB may be a free agent or have only one year left on his deal by the time he ascends to the starting role. That's way i think we hold off for a few more years before we draft our Steve Young.
-However, if you want to find an eventual Moss replacement in 2011, I'm all in and his name is Julio Jones of Alabama. Watch their game against Ole Miss this saturday, 330 on CBS, and you will see that he is the best college WR since Calvin Johnson or Moss himself. He has the strongest hands I have ever seen.
StraightCashHomey81 is offline  
Old 10-08-2009, 06:39 AM   #19
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,322
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patspsycho View Post
You guys keep forgetting that BB never drafts to need.
This is getting to be like one of those urban legends that never die.

Need is a clear factor in the Patriots' drafting. How big a factor depends on makeup of the specific team and its current levels of need. In the rare cases that there's been a hole in the starting lineup the Patriots have moved aggressively to fill it, drafting a player well above where he was projected: Mankins, Gostkowski, Mayo.
patchick is online now  
Old 10-08-2009, 06:40 AM   #20
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: Our 3 no.1 picks in the next two years

Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle eye View Post
I've been thinking a lot about these three no.1s and the possibility that we use them all.

Looking down the road for a moment, in 2011 the Patriots will have three thirty four year olds that I would consider marquee players, those being Tom Brady, Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas.

With the possibility of a rookie cap coming into being in 2011 its the perfect time to be looking to bring in the next generation and develop them. I think next years draft will be the richest one for some time with a lot of younger players leaving college early to try and get a better deal than what might be available in 2011.

I'm not that well up on what an uncapped year would mean for next year's draft. And I'm just wondering if others think that its time to start looking seriously at signing top notch draft picks with Thomas, Moss and most of all Brady closing in on their mid thirties.
If an uncapped year next year means being able to spend more on rookies should they deal a no.1 pick in 2011 for something in next year's draft?
Or should they hold onto them for 2011 and take advantage of an almost certain rookie salary cap?
And do you think the Patriots need to be serously looking finding the replacements for those three players right now?
Those are 3 very different situations you are talking about. Let's address them one by one:

1. Adalius Thomas.

Thomas is signed through the 2011 season, at which time he will be almost 35. I certainly don't see him being a factor beyond then. He could be cut or traded earlier, but his salary cap situation will be a major factor. He is still on the books for almost $9M in signing bonus money after this season, so cutting him is costly.

Mayo and Guyton are solid at LB. Tyrone McKenzie has potential, and we will want to see what he does next year. I see us drafting 1 and possibly 2 LBs in 2010. Someone like Eric Norwood would be a terrific future replacement for Adalius Thomas, and offers a lot of the same positional versatility. Someone like Sean Weatherspoon offers the ability to play in both 3-4 and 4-3 schemes.

2. Randy Moss

Moss is signed through 2010. He has showned somes signs of not being quite the same unstoppable force that he was in 2007, but he is still one of the top WRs in the game, and very crafty. I think he's the kind of player who could be productive for a long time. I think there's a good chance he stays a Pat after 2010.

We certainly need to start grooming an eventual #1 replacement, and a #2/3 guy to go along with Moss and Welker. Brandon Tate may fill the 2nd role, and we should no a lot more by the 2011 draft. There should be some very talented junior WRs coming out in 2011 - AJ Green, Julio Jones, and Michael Floyd - and we may have a high 2011 1st from Oakland, with the possibility of a rookie salary scale to keep the cost down. I could easily see us going after a top WR to groom as Moss' successor in 2011.

3. Tom Brady

Peyton Manning will be 34 in March, and no one seems to be talking about the need to replace him at the moment. I think Brady has at least 5 good years left, especially as his arm had no wear and tear last year. He will almost certainly extend his contract beyond 2010.

I don't see us looking to draft a replacement in the next 2 years. With that said, if an opportunity presents itself, we may be open to looking at a QB. For example, if Jake Locker doesn't come out in 2010 and our Oakland 2011 1st turns out to be a high pick, that could be an option. A long shot right now, but not out of the question. Again, a 2011 rookie salary cap could make a difference.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using next years picks this year....SPECULATION jct Patriots Draft Talk 5 04-26-2008 02:12 PM
Next Years Picks.. DarrylS Patriots Draft Talk 12 05-04-2007 09:38 PM
This years draft picks OsloRhino PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 28 11-20-2006 06:04 PM
Best Draft picks in the past 25 years PATSNUTme PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 19 03-31-2006 12:18 AM
Reiss looks at this years picks PatsRI PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 5 01-25-2006 11:41 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC