tombonneau

Galloway's lack of gelling (to put it kindly) is well-documented -- and the O certainly didn't seem to miss him today -- but my question is:

If Moss/Welker/Edelman are healthy, is Galloway a continued scratch in favor of Aiken and his special teams contributions, or is this merely a shot across Galloway's bow?

My guess is that Belichick has "seen enough" (as Lombardi relates BB/Parcells are wont to say) and will just have Galloway around as injury insurance.

Or hopefully they re-invent his role on the offense and stop miscasting him as a Gaffney-like possession-type guy ...

alvinnf

One week..... He's gone! They chose the wrong guy, should have been Lewis, but time to move on.

Mack Herron

We will know very soon If he is not released, then he still has a chance. If BB has had enough, then he will not make another appearance in the locker room.

The Dynasty

I cant see the Pats getting rid of Galloway, although he isnt even close to what anyone thought he would be, he needs to be kept on the roster until Welker's health is 100%. We arent exactly deep at the WR position

5 Rings for Brady!!

He reminds me so much of Doug Gabriel...but I think they keep him around, they do need depth.

Patspsycho

He ain't



Gellin'

livinginthe past

Galloway is better than Sam Aiken.

weswelker#83

Galloway's absence could mean his departure is near
Patriots journal: Galloway's absence could mean his departure is near | New England Patriots | projo.com | The Providence Journal

Reckedtrek

Would they just cut him, or at least try to find a trade? -at least for a LB prospect or to address one of our teams biggest needs: punter.

__________________
Full Tilt, Full Time! Thanks Tedy!!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



... I use heavy strings, tune low, play hard and floor it. Floor it, That's technical talk. ~ Stevie Ray Vaughan
.

The Dynasty

I stay he sticks around till around the bye week then when Welker's health is certain he goes.