09-26-2009, 08:48 PM
|
#9
|
|
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,293
|
Re: Brady's first two weeks vs. Manning's first two weeks (2008)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthandmiles
It is funny to hear. I was under the impression that many people thought Manning was undeserving of the MVP? Or is it that his accomplishments were impressive, just not MVP worthy?
|
It sounds like you are under a lot of impressions of what other people think.
But looking at the OP's original message again, I didn't see any of all that Manning worthy/not worthy stuff that you are under the impression that other people think. The message was about Brady, not Manning, and my guess is that most people, like me, do not remember who the NFL MVP was last year.
Me, I think the OP had a great post and had some significant data to show that Brady is doing as well as can be expected. I'm not sure why no one can understand his post, or the point he is making.
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010
|
|
|