Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2009, 10:29 PM   #1
In the Starting Line-up
 
patfanken's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canton MA
Posts: 4,890
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Well, once again I lost interest by the end of the 3rd quarter. The game is tied, and I guess I'll find out about the results after I finish this.

Things I liked -

I think the most impressive thing that popped out to me was the coverage of the secondary. It certainly wasn't perfect. The Redskins had some guys that are on "scholarship" too. But became clear VERY quickly was the fact that the Pats coverage guys were ALWAYS right on the ball. Much closer than last year. There were a lot of near misses, and plays that required perfect throws to beat the coverage. It was MUCH better than last year, and it bodes well for the regular season.

I liked how the DL played, though I'm not in love with the 4-3. They completely shut down the Skin's very good running attack until well into the 3rd quarter, when the subs started to be inserted, and even THEN it didn't suck

I liked how the OL pass protected. Did anyone hear the $100MM man's name called once. For the most part Brady had time to make a throw, even on his self imposed sack.

I liked the improvement I saw in Brady. (boy that sounds funny even as I type it). He was occasionally a little impatient, like his "sack" where he had more time than he thought, and a couple of other times, but all in all, there were streaks when it was pure 2007 Brady. We just have to see more of them

I liked that the DL got some good pressure on the QB, not great, but AGAIN solid improvement over last year.

I liked the fact that we finally got Moroney involved in the passing game. We should have that swing pass, and option route over the middle any time we want it.

This year I think we will see a much improved defense, front to back.

Here's what I didn't like.

For all the great coverage the DBs did, they still allowed TOOO MUCH yardage after the catch. The tackling is still piss poor. Granted the Cooley 76 yd catch was a case of a broken coverage (and was one of only 2 plays the secondary was clearly beat - the other being a long incompletion that Bodden was beat on), but the fact was that it should have been only half of that yardage if, IIRC, Bodden had made the tackle

I'm getting real sick of watching our DEs simply run themselves out of the play. We'd teach HS kids that once they get beyond the QB's drop, DON'T keep running by him, go to plan B. Try a spin move or do a stop an go, or a reverse swim, AND I'm sure the Pats coaches aren't telling them to run themselves out of the play.

Burgess was a little better tonight, but I think I may want to my 3rd round pick back.

I also want my 3-4 back. At least I knew what was going on in that defense. The 4-3 seems too inconsistent to me, and I worry about a running attack that has planned for it. It also limits some guys. Woods is a 3-4 OLB, not a 4-3 OLB, sure he set the edge well on a number of running plays, but looked lost in coverage. I think Crable would be even more out of place.

Maybe its because I was raised in the 3-4 from HS, when it was called the 52 Okie, and OLBs were DEs, and DE were DTs, and a Noseman, was a noseman. Its a defense I played in college (NT/ILB),. Its the base defense I coached in HS. The only time I didn't play it was after college, and then I was a WSLB or a SS, so I was playing in space, so it mattered less what the front was. I don't know, but this 4-3, if that's going to be our base, will take some getting used to.

I know one thing. Wilfolk must LOVE the change from getting his ass beaten on at NT, from being forced to absorb punishment, to being the giver of it.

I didn't see Brace out there, was he hurt?

The offense missed Welker AND Edelman. Galloway took one for the team, taking his spot, but that, quite frankly, is NOT his skill set. Brady missed his 5-7 yd guy all night. Just a thought, but is Edelman being hidden for the rest of preseason, so they can stash him on the PS and go with 5 WRs

I didn't like the fact that we still can't get the TEs involved in the passing attack. I'm beginning to think that its not all the TEs fault.

I'm not happy with the running attack at all, and ITS NOT the fault of the RBs. Our running plays just take too damned long to develop, and we didn't run a single running play from the shot gun.

Summary:

There were things to hate. Things to worry about (like Brady's arm). And things to like. All in all I think we are on the right track, though no where near a finished product. Make no mistake that this should be a better team than last year's team....but it isn't yet.
patfanken is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-28-2009, 10:33 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,585
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Quote:
Originally Posted by patfanken View Post
Just a thought, but is Edelman being hidden for the rest of preseason, so they can stash him on the PS and go with 5 WRs
The only way they can "stash" Edelman is on IR. If he'd been healthy, he would have probably been running with the 1s.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:35 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
BradfordPatsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bradford, MA
Posts: 2,481
Send a message via AIM to BradfordPatsFan
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Good thoughts in general.

Brace was on the inactive list.

The edge rush seemed to be coming a little faster off the snap, but a few times the ROLB (I think) got caught too far up field.

I love seeing corner blitzes. I do not recall seeing too many of those last year.
__________________
Patriots Football...
It is what it is!
BradfordPatsFan is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:37 PM   #4
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: newport beach ca
Posts: 76
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

they better give up on chung returning kicks. other than the last one he returned to get us in field goal range, he was terrible. stick to safety...
chillinvillin is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:39 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
slash83's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 3,022
My Mood: Cheerful
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Quote:
Originally Posted by patfanken View Post
Well, once again I lost interest by the end of the 3rd quarter. The game is tied, and I guess I'll find out about the results after I finish this.

Things I liked -

I think the most impressive thing that popped out to me was the coverage of the secondary. It certainly wasn't perfect. The Redskins had some guys that are on "scholarship" too. But became clear VERY quickly was the fact that the Pats coverage guys were ALWAYS right on the ball. Much closer than last year. There were a lot of near misses, and plays that required perfect throws to beat the coverage. It was MUCH better than last year, and it bodes well for the regular season.

I liked how the DL played, though I'm not in love with the 4-3. They completely shut down the Skin's very good running attack until well into the 3rd quarter, when the subs started to be inserted, and even THEN it didn't suck

I liked how the OL pass protected. Did anyone hear the $100MM man's name called once. For the most part Brady had time to make a throw, even on his self imposed sack.

I liked the improvement I saw in Brady. (boy that sounds funny even as I type it). He was occasionally a little impatient, like his "sack" where he had more time than he thought, and a couple of other times, but all in all, there were streaks when it was pure 2007 Brady. We just have to see more of them

I liked that the DL got some good pressure on the QB, not great, but AGAIN solid improvement over last year.

I liked the fact that we finally got Moroney involved in the passing game. We should have that swing pass, and option route over the middle any time we want it.

This year I think we will see a much improved defense, front to back.

Here's what I didn't like.

For all the great coverage the DBs did, they still allowed TOOO MUCH yardage after the catch. The tackling is still piss poor. Granted the Cooley 76 yd catch was a case of a broken coverage (and was one of only 2 plays the secondary was clearly beat - the other being a long incompletion that Bodden was beat on), but the fact was that it should have been only half of that yardage if, IIRC, Bodden had made the tackle

I'm getting real sick of watching our DEs simply run themselves out of the play. We'd teach HS kids that once they get beyond the QB's drop, DON'T keep running by him, go to plan B. Try a spin move or do a stop an go, or a reverse swim, AND I'm sure the Pats coaches aren't telling them to run themselves out of the play.

Burgess was a little better tonight, but I think I may want to my 3rd round pick back.

I also want my 3-4 back. At least I knew what was going on in that defense. The 4-3 seems too inconsistent to me, and I worry about a running attack that has planned for it. It also limits some guys. Woods is a 3-4 OLB, not a 4-3 OLB, sure he set the edge well on a number of running plays, but looked lost in coverage. I think Crable would be even more out of place.

Maybe its because I was raised in the 3-4 from HS, when it was called the 52 Okie, and OLBs were DEs, and DE were DTs, and a Noseman, was a noseman. Its a defense I played in college (NT/ILB),. Its the base defense I coached in HS. The only time I didn't play it was after college, and then I was a WSLB or a SS, so I was playing in space, so it mattered less what the front was. I don't know, but this 4-3, if that's going to be our base, will take some getting used to.

I know one thing. Wilfolk must LOVE the change from getting his ass beaten on at NT, from being forced to absorb punishment, to being the giver of it.

I didn't see Brace out there, was he hurt?

The offense missed Welker AND Edelman. Galloway took one for the team, taking his spot, but that, quite frankly, is NOT his skill set. Brady missed his 5-7 yd guy all night. Just a thought, but is Edelman being hidden for the rest of preseason, so they can stash him on the PS and go with 5 WRs

I didn't like the fact that we still can't get the TEs involved in the passing attack. I'm beginning to think that its not all the TEs fault.

I'm not happy with the running attack at all, and ITS NOT the fault of the RBs. Our running plays just take too damned long to develop, and we didn't run a single running play from the shot gun.

Summary:

There were things to hate. Things to worry about (like Brady's arm). And things to like. All in all I think we are on the right track, though no where near a finished product. Make no mistake that this should be a better team than last year's team....but it isn't yet.
Good stuff man, I like the secondary also, with Springs in the starting lineup and more playing time the group will only get better.

The run D looks stout as ever. Pass rush was consistent, a lot of collapsed pockets.

Brady n Moss look deadly as usual.

Pass protection was very solid against a powerful front 7.
__________________
Madden ID for ps3- bradydabest
slash83 is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:47 PM   #6
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
signbabybrady's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 8,299
My Mood: Buzzed
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Quote:
Originally Posted by slash83 View Post
Good stuff man, I like the secondary also, with Springs in the starting lineup and more playing time the group will only get better.

The run D looks stout as ever. Pass rush was consistent, a lot of collapsed pockets.

Brady n Moss look deadly as usual.

Pass protection was very solid against a powerful front 7.
You don't think Whilhite has won the Starting spot with Bodden?
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"

"DON'T TALK TO ME!!!"
signbabybrady is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:49 PM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Quote:
Originally Posted by signbabybrady View Post
You don't think Whilhite has won the Starting spot with Bodden?
Must be Wilhite's fantasy points or somesuch.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 10:54 PM   #8
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
patsox23's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,350
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Quote:
Originally Posted by patfanken View Post
Just a thought, but is Edelman being hidden for the rest of preseason, so they can stash him on the PS and go with 5 WRs.
Well, pat, obviously you're far more positive about tonight that I was, and I suppose I really hope you're right. I know JD will be sending you a Valentine for not being negative like I was. He wuvs the pro stance!

As for this bit, I think there is no way Edelman gets stashed. He's very likely the 4th receiver and the starting punt returner. I believe he'll see a lot of time in the offense.
patsox23 is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 11:23 PM   #9
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
Patriot_in_NY's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 8,333
My Mood: Blah
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

Good stuff Ken...

I actually was a little encouraged by the run game, funny as it sounds. Wash is pretty beefy up front and I think they are gonna have a beastly run defense, so I was expecting we'd struggle mightly there tonight. We did, for sure, but there were certainly a few times where we had a little room. O-line got manhandled again in the run game (held well in the pass though), but I think our backs did a little better then I expected. That said, any Pat run game not including Faulk is gonna be pedestrian to me.

Galloway is putty in more work with brady, and it's starting to show. Brady to Moss looks okay too

My conclusion mirror yours. A lot to like, a lot to nash teeth over. Pretty much your typical #3 preseason game.

Last edited by Patriot_in_NY; 08-28-2009 at 11:24 PM..
Patriot_in_NY is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 12:31 AM   #10
ALP
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ALP's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,153
Default Re: Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal

for all this talk about a bad run game......we did average 4.6 a carry if im not mistaken....

and at 4.6, thats most defenitely NOT something to worry about
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty

Then I moved away and they haven't won since

...now I'm moving back, and a Lombardi I predict
ALP is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eyes on the prize - the dress rehersal patfanken PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 08-28-2009 10:25 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC