08-16-2009, 05:04 PM
|
#2
|
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
|
Re: Is 15 Roster Spots Enough For The Front 7?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
15 has been enough in the past (often 6 DL's and 9 LB's). I think that even with more 4-3, we could still keep the same number.
DL (7) Seymour, Wilfork, Warren, Wright, Brace, Green, Pryor/Smith
OLB/DE (2) Burgess, Banta-Cain
OLB (3) Thomas, Woods, Crable
ILB (3) Mayo, Guyton, Bruschi
A 16th is certainly possible, perhaps reasonable. Lenon and Ninkovitch come to mind.
9 DB's seems to be sufficient with McGowan competing with Tank and special teamers for the 9th DB roster spot.
|
Very reasonable analysis. I agree with your 7 DLs, with Pryor looking to edge out Smith at this point if he continues to show well. I'm not sure TBC is a lock, and Thomas can certainly play DE as well as OLB. I'm not sure how much we can depend on Bruschi.
9 DBs sounds about right, with 4 safeties and 5 CBs pretty well set, though I'd like to find a spot for Tank Williams. Slater and Ventrone will be hard pressed to make the roster between the depth at safety and WR, especially with Edelman looking strong.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid
"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
|
|
|