Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsBoy12
So guys just decide to get injured? And here I was all these years thinking that injuries were unpredictable. Why the hell would Tom Brady decide to just sit out last year? What a selfish guy.
I was just being sarcastic. But I'm sure you picked that up.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Just wanted to add one more thing. If the LB's have never been a problem for the Pats, please tell me why they eventually lost in 2005 playoffs, 2006 playoffs, 2007 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 2008? And I don't want to hear injuries.
lol - 07 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 08 were the LBs fault? Classic. Your just making **** up now. BB has worked to improve the LBs consistently when he was able to do it. He's arguably completely re-built the starting 4 in 10: Guyton, Mayo, Woods, and Crable. Your argument is just plain whack. I keep saying it because it's true.
Edit: oh yeah, throw in Thomas in '10 as well. Still whack.
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel
lol - 07 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 08 were the LBs fault? Classic. Your just making **** up now.
Making stuff up? You still haven't answered my question. Please tell me why the Pats lost to the Broncos in '05, the Colts in '06, Giants in '08 super bowl and not making the playoffs in '08-'09 regular season. You know what, I will take it a step further and say the entire defense is the reason why the Pats haven't won a super bowl since '04. Have fun arguing against that.
Quote:
BB has worked to improve the LBs consistently when he was able to do it. He's arguably completely re-built the starting 4 in 10: Guyton, Mayo, Woods, and Crable. Your argument is just plain whack. I keep saying it because it's true.
Edit: oh yeah, throw in Thomas in '10 as well. Still whack.
Your argument sucks balls! The best you can do is criticize me and bring up who BB has brought in recently. You assume that Guyton, Crable, and even Woods are sure things. Good argument.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-27-2009 at 05:17 PM.
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Making stuff up? You still haven't answered my question. Please tell me why the Pats lost to the Broncos in '05, the Colts in '06, Giants in '08 super bowl and not making the playoffs in '08-'09 regular season. You know what, I will take it a step further and say the entire defense is the reason why the Pats haven't won a super bowl since '04. Have fun arguing against that.
Your argument sucks balls! The best you can do is criticize me and bring up who BB has brought in recently. You assume that Guyton, Crable, and even Woods are sure things. Good argument.
Honestly, I agree with 2006 and the Colts, the Colts in the second half exposed the LBs and kept going up the middle deep where we were weak, that's pretty much a fact.
In 2007 I can't blame them, they held their own for 3 quarters and the offense couldn't put the ball in the end zone. Granted when the defense had a chance to win the game they didn't, it was still one of the worst called games on offense of the BB era. Further, the secondary blew it at the end with Samuel dropping the winning INT and then lollygagging on the Tyree play instead of sticking on him when Eli was in the grasp.
In 2005 the whole team just played awful that game. Hell we would have went into half time up at least 3-0 if not for Faulks fumble and then Hobbs' fumble, instead we gave them 10 points.
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Making stuff up? You still haven't answered my question. Please tell me why the Pats lost to the Broncos in '05, the Colts in '06, Giants in '08 super bowl and not making the playoffs in '08-'09 regular season. You know what, I will take it a step further and say the entire defense is the reason why the Pats haven't won a super bowl since '04. Have fun arguing against that.
The super bowl where the historic offense score 14 points? Yeah, it's on the LBs. The same game where the O line was repeatedly blown up? Yeah, that's the LBs fault too. Oh yeah, 08 where the backup QB almost lead the team to the playoffs? Yeah, that's the LBs fault, too. You're about a quarter inch away from being diagnosed with down's syndrome, dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Your argument sucks balls! The best you can do is criticize me and bring up who BB has brought in recently. You assume that Guyton, Crable, and even Woods are sure things. Good argument.
BB has done a good job re-building the entire team, LBs included. That's my argument and if you want to contradict that, that's fine. Continue being a complete idiot.
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel
The super bowl where the historic offense score 14 points? Yeah, it's on the LBs. The same game where the O line was repeatedly blown up? Yeah, that's the LBs fault too. Oh yeah, 08 where the backup QB almost lead the team to the playoffs? Yeah, that's the LBs fault, too. You're about a quarter inch away from being diagnosed with down's syndrome, dude.
BB has done a good job re-building the entire team, LBs included. That's my argument and if you want to contradict that, that's fine. Continue being a complete idiot.
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel
The super bowl where the historic offense score 14 points? Yeah, it's on the LBs. The same game where the O line was repeatedly blown up? Yeah, that's the LBs fault too. Oh yeah, 08 where the backup QB almost lead the team to the playoffs? Yeah, that's the LBs fault, too. You're about a quarter inch away from being diagnosed with down's syndrome, dude.
You only attempted to answered part of the question. The defense in the super bowl gave up over 80 yards to the Giants offense with with less than 3:00 minutes left in the game. If you want to make such a dumb argument that this historic offense only scored 14 points, that offense carried the team the entire season. They scored when it mattered most. So they have one bad game out of 19 games. But when the defense has to make one f****** stop, they fail.
Yeah in '08, their defense was really top notch. How the hell didn't they make playoffs?
Their LB's repeatedly were burned by TE's and average receivers over the middle because of their lack of speed. And their secondary sucked balls as well, but you probably thought they were top notch.
Quote:
BB has done a good job re-building the entire team, LBs included. That's my argument and if you want to contradict that, that's fine. Continue being a complete idiot.
Whackness all over this thread.
You keep saying this over and over again without any evidence to support this. You say he has done a good job because he brought Guyton, Woods, Crable and Mayo in. Mayo is the only proven player on the team. The rest are question marks. Nice try though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsBoy12
Ouch. Point - Apple Strudel.
I'm heart broken.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-27-2009 at 08:31 PM.
Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
They scored when it mattered most. So they have one bad game out of 19 games. But when the defense has to make one f****** stop, they fail.
Secondary as much to blame as LBs. Could also point to the DL some.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Yeah in '08, their defense was really top notch. How the hell didn't they make playoffs?
Yeah, it's not like they were only the 2nd 11-5 team in NFL history to not do so. Yeah, it's not like we lost some early games to Cassel's learning curve and gimmick offenses we weren't prepared for. But sure, blame that Miami game on BB inability to scout and sign LBs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?
Their LB's repeatedly were burned by TE's and average receivers over the middle because of their lack of speed. And their secondary sucked balls as well, but you probably thought they were top notch.
Our LBs in 08 lack speed? Guyton was the fastest LB in the draft, Mayo runs a 4.54, and Thomas has great speed. I think you mean we have 2 LBs in 08 who lacked speed, and 1 of them was just fine only the year before. But sure, blame BB for the aging process as well.