Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2009, 02:39 PM   #71
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsBoy12 View Post
So guys just decide to get injured? And here I was all these years thinking that injuries were unpredictable. Why the hell would Tom Brady decide to just sit out last year? What a selfish guy.
I was just being sarcastic. But I'm sure you picked that up.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-27-2009, 02:41 PM   #72
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PatsBoy12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 915
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
I was just being sarcastic. But I'm sure you picked that up.
Yeah, I was being equally sarcastic so it's all good.
PatsBoy12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 03:50 PM   #73
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Just wanted to add one more thing. If the LB's have never been a problem for the Pats, please tell me why they eventually lost in 2005 playoffs, 2006 playoffs, 2007 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 2008? And I don't want to hear injuries.
lol - 07 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 08 were the LBs fault? Classic. Your just making **** up now. BB has worked to improve the LBs consistently when he was able to do it. He's arguably completely re-built the starting 4 in 10: Guyton, Mayo, Woods, and Crable. Your argument is just plain whack. I keep saying it because it's true.

Edit: oh yeah, throw in Thomas in '10 as well. Still whack.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 05:09 PM   #74
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
lol - 07 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 08 were the LBs fault? Classic. Your just making **** up now.
Making stuff up? You still haven't answered my question. Please tell me why the Pats lost to the Broncos in '05, the Colts in '06, Giants in '08 super bowl and not making the playoffs in '08-'09 regular season. You know what, I will take it a step further and say the entire defense is the reason why the Pats haven't won a super bowl since '04. Have fun arguing against that.


Quote:
BB has worked to improve the LBs consistently when he was able to do it. He's arguably completely re-built the starting 4 in 10: Guyton, Mayo, Woods, and Crable. Your argument is just plain whack. I keep saying it because it's true.

Edit: oh yeah, throw in Thomas in '10 as well. Still whack.
Your argument sucks balls! The best you can do is criticize me and bring up who BB has brought in recently. You assume that Guyton, Crable, and even Woods are sure things. Good argument.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-27-2009 at 05:17 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 05:59 PM   #75
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PatsSox363804's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans by way of Medford MA
Posts: 723
Send a message via AIM to PatsSox363804 Send a message via Yahoo to PatsSox363804
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Making stuff up? You still haven't answered my question. Please tell me why the Pats lost to the Broncos in '05, the Colts in '06, Giants in '08 super bowl and not making the playoffs in '08-'09 regular season. You know what, I will take it a step further and say the entire defense is the reason why the Pats haven't won a super bowl since '04. Have fun arguing against that.




Your argument sucks balls! The best you can do is criticize me and bring up who BB has brought in recently. You assume that Guyton, Crable, and even Woods are sure things. Good argument.
Honestly, I agree with 2006 and the Colts, the Colts in the second half exposed the LBs and kept going up the middle deep where we were weak, that's pretty much a fact.

In 2007 I can't blame them, they held their own for 3 quarters and the offense couldn't put the ball in the end zone. Granted when the defense had a chance to win the game they didn't, it was still one of the worst called games on offense of the BB era. Further, the secondary blew it at the end with Samuel dropping the winning INT and then lollygagging on the Tyree play instead of sticking on him when Eli was in the grasp.

In 2005 the whole team just played awful that game. Hell we would have went into half time up at least 3-0 if not for Faulks fumble and then Hobbs' fumble, instead we gave them 10 points.
PatsSox363804 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 07:27 PM   #76
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Making stuff up? You still haven't answered my question. Please tell me why the Pats lost to the Broncos in '05, the Colts in '06, Giants in '08 super bowl and not making the playoffs in '08-'09 regular season. You know what, I will take it a step further and say the entire defense is the reason why the Pats haven't won a super bowl since '04. Have fun arguing against that.
The super bowl where the historic offense score 14 points? Yeah, it's on the LBs. The same game where the O line was repeatedly blown up? Yeah, that's the LBs fault too. Oh yeah, 08 where the backup QB almost lead the team to the playoffs? Yeah, that's the LBs fault, too. You're about a quarter inch away from being diagnosed with down's syndrome, dude.


Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Your argument sucks balls! The best you can do is criticize me and bring up who BB has brought in recently. You assume that Guyton, Crable, and even Woods are sure things. Good argument.
BB has done a good job re-building the entire team, LBs included. That's my argument and if you want to contradict that, that's fine. Continue being a complete idiot.

Whackness all over this thread.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 07:52 PM   #77
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PatsBoy12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 915
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
The super bowl where the historic offense score 14 points? Yeah, it's on the LBs. The same game where the O line was repeatedly blown up? Yeah, that's the LBs fault too. Oh yeah, 08 where the backup QB almost lead the team to the playoffs? Yeah, that's the LBs fault, too. You're about a quarter inch away from being diagnosed with down's syndrome, dude.




BB has done a good job re-building the entire team, LBs included. That's my argument and if you want to contradict that, that's fine. Continue being a complete idiot.

Whackness all over this thread.
Ouch. Point - Apple Strudel.
PatsBoy12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 08:19 PM   #78
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
The super bowl where the historic offense score 14 points? Yeah, it's on the LBs. The same game where the O line was repeatedly blown up? Yeah, that's the LBs fault too. Oh yeah, 08 where the backup QB almost lead the team to the playoffs? Yeah, that's the LBs fault, too. You're about a quarter inch away from being diagnosed with down's syndrome, dude.
You only attempted to answered part of the question. The defense in the super bowl gave up over 80 yards to the Giants offense with with less than 3:00 minutes left in the game. If you want to make such a dumb argument that this historic offense only scored 14 points, that offense carried the team the entire season. They scored when it mattered most. So they have one bad game out of 19 games. But when the defense has to make one f****** stop, they fail.

Yeah in '08, their defense was really top notch. How the hell didn't they make playoffs?
Their LB's repeatedly were burned by TE's and average receivers over the middle because of their lack of speed. And their secondary sucked balls as well, but you probably thought they were top notch.

Quote:
BB has done a good job re-building the entire team, LBs included. That's my argument and if you want to contradict that, that's fine. Continue being a complete idiot.
Whackness all over this thread.
You keep saying this over and over again without any evidence to support this. You say he has done a good job because he brought Guyton, Woods, Crable and Mayo in. Mayo is the only proven player on the team. The rest are question marks. Nice try though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsBoy12 View Post
Ouch. Point - Apple Strudel.
I'm heart broken.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-27-2009 at 08:31 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:12 PM   #79
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PatsBoy12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 915
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post

I'm heart broken.
Score remains 1 - 0; advantage - Strudel.
PatsBoy12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 08:37 AM   #80
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
They scored when it mattered most. So they have one bad game out of 19 games. But when the defense has to make one f****** stop, they fail.
Secondary as much to blame as LBs. Could also point to the DL some.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Yeah in '08, their defense was really top notch. How the hell didn't they make playoffs?
Yeah, it's not like they were only the 2nd 11-5 team in NFL history to not do so. Yeah, it's not like we lost some early games to Cassel's learning curve and gimmick offenses we weren't prepared for. But sure, blame that Miami game on BB inability to scout and sign LBs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Their LB's repeatedly were burned by TE's and average receivers over the middle because of their lack of speed. And their secondary sucked balls as well, but you probably thought they were top notch.
Our LBs in 08 lack speed? Guyton was the fastest LB in the draft, Mayo runs a 4.54, and Thomas has great speed. I think you mean we have 2 LBs in 08 who lacked speed, and 1 of them was just fine only the year before. But sure, blame BB for the aging process as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
I'm brain broken.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
clay matthews, shawn crable

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426