Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2009, 11:55 PM   #61
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
jays52's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,200
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Yes, I really believe this. In my opinion, he has been a disappointment and robbed the Patriots. From his slow start in 2008 to him not finishing off Eli in the super bowl. Had he sacked Eli before his miracle throw, he would have earned his money.
Coulda, woulda, shoulda. Not only was AD held on that play, he clearly had Manning in the grasp. It was a damned if he did, damned if he didn't type of play. If he threw 10 to the ground, he would have been flagged 15 yards. He actually made the smart call by hanging off of him while waiting for a holding flag/in the grasp call. I really think you are a bright guy, and enjoy a lot of your posts, so I don't want this to seem personal. That said, I really think you are off base with your evaluation of Thomas. Just a couple of quick questions to help me build your opinion in my mind. Do you watch the OLB vs tight end play at all? Do you know how to look for and indentify loops/stunts? Are you aware of pre-snap defensive changes? Do you watch OLB's engaging blockers?
__________________
insert something witty about the patriots here.
jays52 is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-27-2009, 12:14 AM   #62
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jays52 View Post
Coulda, woulda, shoulda. Not only was AD held on that play, he clearly had Manning in the grasp. It was a damned if he did, damned if he didn't type of play. If he threw 10 to the ground, he would have been flagged 15 yards.
I highly doubt they would have called roughing for the same reason why the refs didn't call in the grasp (which they should have). My observation of the play was Thomas looked to have him in the grasp and kind of gave up because he assumed the refs would have called the play dead. Same can be said with the rest of the D-line.

Quote:
I really think you are a bright guy, and enjoy a lot of your posts, so I don't want this to seem personal.
Thanks for the compliment. However, I'm sure most people on this board would disagree.

Quote:
That said, I really think you are off base with your evaluation of Thomas. Just a couple of quick questions to help me build your opinion in my mind. Do you watch the OLB vs tight end play at all? Do you know how to look for and indentify loops/stunts? Are you aware of pre-snap defensive changes? Do you watch OLB's engaging blockers?
Yes, I think I understand were you're going with this. I understand that when Adalius was in coverage, the opposing TE's became invisible. However, Thomas had to remain in coverage because nobody else can cover the TE. I understand that LB's make adjustments at the line and go into coverage when they were originally intended to rush the passer.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 12:36 AM   #63
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
jays52's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,200
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Yes, I think I understand were you're going with this. I understand that when Adalius was in coverage, the opposing TE's became invisible. However, Thomas had to remain in coverage because nobody else can cover the TE. I understand that LB's make adjustments at the line and go into coverage when they were originally intended to rush the passer.
I see your point, but the complexities of the position are far deeper. The assignments change from set to set, down to down. Thomas is on the field for almost all of the snaps. In defensive football, this is one of the best endorsements of a player's versatility. He is currently the best player on the roster in shedding blocks, the best pass rusher on the team, the fastest, most explosive linebacker, and the best pass coverage OLB in the AFCE. He really is a special player who transcends cursory evaluations. If you watch what opposing offenses do, 70% of their linebacker gameplan is based around shutting him down.
__________________
insert something witty about the patriots here.
jays52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 12:55 AM   #64
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jays52 View Post
I see your point, but the complexities of the position are far deeper. The assignments change from set to set, down to down. Thomas is on the field for almost all of the snaps. In defensive football, this is one of the best endorsements of a player's versatility. He is currently the best player on the roster in shedding blocks, the best pass rusher on the team, the fastest, most explosive linebacker, and the best pass coverage OLB in the AFCE. He really is a special player who transcends cursory evaluations. If you watch what opposing offenses do, 70% of their linebacker gameplan is based around shutting him down.
All of your points are spot on and can't argue with any of them. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I would to see Thomas getting after QB's more often because he awesome at bull rushing offensive lineman. In fact, he was one Eli Manning sack away from being my super bowl MVP. I assume the reason why we don't see Thomas rushing the passer very much is because the Pats don't have any coverage LB's. However, I hope Mayo and Guyton can take on that role to allow the coaching staff to unleash Thomas. Also, I hope that Woods or Crable will make opposing offenses reduce opposing offense to slide their protection towards Thomas's side.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 01:16 AM   #65
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Patjew's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shenzhen, China
Posts: 5,949
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
I didn't know there were two Vrabel's on the team.
Umm, he was so dominant that it seemed like there were.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
What is the rap thread? Can somebody help me out?
Bump it up, baby. Brady and Moss names mentioned in rap lyrics
__________________
Ian bows to no one. He is like the love child of Chuck Norris and Adam Seward.
Patjew is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 09:05 AM   #66
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
The only LB's that were FA's and succeeded with BB were Mike Vrabel, Roman Phifer, Brian Cox and Seau. The only problem was, 3 out of the 4 LB's didn't last long with the team.
Colvin and Thomas say hi. Completely and utterly whack argument.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 12:35 PM   #67
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
Colvin and Thomas say hi. Completely and utterly whack argument.
Re-read my post again. These were guys mentioned after Colvin and Thomas. I said Colvin has played well. However, he really wasn't able to make the impact we all hoped after suffering that injury in 2003. Thomas has done some good things, but I think he needs to make more of an impact rushing the passer because he is very good at that.

I'm glad your satisfied with the LB's because I'm not.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-27-2009 at 12:36 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 01:16 PM   #68
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Re-read my post again. These were guys mentioned after Colvin and Thomas. I said Colvin has played well. However, he really wasn't able to make the impact we all hoped after suffering that injury in 2003. Thomas has done some good things, but I think he needs to make more of an impact rushing the passer because he is very good at that.

I'm glad your satisfied with the LB's because I'm not.
So the 2 pro-bowl type OLBs BB signs do a lot of great things for the team outside of injuries and you're complaining? There are only so many Wares to go around.

Thomas will be back this year, only 2 seasons removed from being the undeniable top FA available. We've got 2 or possibly 3 young, prototypical OLBs to start opposite him. BB didn't trade Vrabes on, you know, a whim.

Your argument is all over the map. One one hand you're saying BB doesn't evaluate LBs well. But there's so much evidence to contradict that it's silly. On the other hand, you're saying we don't have much of a pass rush. Again, in 07 we were fantastic. in 08 we were, what, average? That includes injuries and Vrabes falling off a cliff. in 09 we've got Thomas back and those young players coming in. I think we've got a shot at having a pretty good pass rush this year. Finally, BB has done a fantastic job drafting Mayo and getting younger in the middle. So basically what you're saying is that you, like every other person inclined to state the obvious, don't know what Woods and Crable will bring to the table this year. Going from BB has failed to bring in good LBs to we've got 2 young guys with potential but we don't know what they'll bring to the table is leaping a gap the size of the grand canyon.

Totally whack argument.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 02:22 PM   #69
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post

So the 2 pro-bowl type OLB's BB signs do a lot of great things for the team outside of injuries and you're complaining? There are only so many Wares to go around.
Just to let you know Colvin is not a pro bowler. Colvin had 2 good season with the Bears getting 11 sacks. After his injury in 2003, he never got back to his pro bowl form. Second, Adalius Thomas made the pro bowl with the Ravens and hasn't played like it with the Pats.

Quote:
Thomas will be back this year, only 2 seasons removed from being the undeniable top FA available. We've got 2 or possibly 3 young, prototypical OLBs to start opposite him. BB didn't trade Vrabes on, you know, a whim.
That is exactly why they went after Jason Taylor, Greg Ellis and rumored to have interest in Peppers and Burgess. It's comical how your not worried about the LB's.

Quote:
Finally, BB has done a fantastic job drafting Mayo and getting younger in the middle.
Mayo is a start, where's the other guy? If your talking about Guyton, I hope he takes over for Bruschi on opening day.

Quote:
Again, in 07 we were fantastic.
You are obviously having a hard time understanding that teams playing the Pats abandoned the run and threw the entire game. Of course you are going to get sacks when a team throws for 4 quarters. But in '08, teams were able to run their normal offense because the Pats weren't scoring at will on them. Vrabel was god awful in '08, getting stoned at the line of scrimmage on majority of the pass plays and Thomas decided to get injured. Just watching them try to sack the QB made me cringe and felt embarrassed for them.

Quote:
Totally whack argument.
You can't seem to stop saying this at the end of your posts. Nothing you say is going to change my mind and nothing I say is going to change your mind. However, if Crable or Woods or Crable and Woods make an impact, then I will obviously shut about this. But if the Pats struggle like they did in '08, you guys will never hear the end of it from me.


Just wanted to add one more thing. If the LB's have never been a problem for the Pats, please tell me why they eventually lost in 2005 playoffs, 2006 playoffs, 2007 super bowl and missing the playoffs in 2008? And I don't want to hear injuries.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-27-2009 at 02:34 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 02:37 PM   #70
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PatsBoy12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 915
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post


Thomas decided to get injured.
So guys just decide to get injured? And here I was all these years thinking that injuries were unpredictable. Why the hell would Tom Brady decide to just sit out last year? What a selfish guy.

Last edited by PatsBoy12; 06-27-2009 at 02:38 PM.
PatsBoy12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
clay matthews, shawn crable

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426