Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2009, 05:22 PM   #41
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,542
Lightbulb Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
The Pats defense is heading in the right direction, but far from finishing touches. Sure their O-line sucks, but how is their D-line falling apart?
The only good Steeler Defensive lineman is almost as old a Willie McGinnest; and there is no one on the horizon to replace him.
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-26-2009, 06:12 PM   #42
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,542
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Your argument is terrible. Everybody in defense of BB says the same thing. First, he coached the Giants. I'm not talking about the Giants, I'm talking about the Patriots. Also, was BB in charge of drafting guys like Harry Carson, Carl Banks and Lawrence Taylor? If he wasn't, it makes your argument even worse. Second, "But he's won 3 super bowls with older unheralded LB's". Thanks for the great insight. Since 2005, their LB's have been regressing and BB has drafted 2 LB's in the first 3 rounds since. Mayo is a good start but Crable is a question mark. Even any moron on the street can tell you that the LB's are what makes the 3-4 go. For a team that has had the least amount of holes on their roster since 2004, it should've have been a cake walk to replace their LB's.
Belichick had to spend the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 offseasons rebuilding the Offense, if you hadn't noticed, Bro. Belichick has had to rebuild every squad on the Patriots since he arrived in 2000. His initial construction of the LB corps in 200-2001, has had augmentation until 2007-2008 offseason.

I fully believe that the LB corps is pretty good, even is some youngsters haven't made their marks fully. Mayo, Woods, Crabel, Guyton, and even Redd, all have ideal size, and either truly rare, (all but...), or only good (Woods), speed & size. All save Redd, have shown flashes of talent. I didn't even include the high draft pick, smart & talented, Tyrone McKenzie among the newcomers, but he is out for the year, just like a vet from mid-decade. He would be the sixth youngster to go with three vet starters, Adalius, Paris and Tedy.

Just how many youngsters can you groom simultaneously? The Pats F. O. had lots of opportunities to draft more LBs than the single high pick, they used this draft. Many have said they appear non-chalant; and they did freely trade Mike Vrabel. Everyone has speculated that they have seen lots in practice that we haven't seen yet, and I agree.

Despite your memories of the mid-decade Patriots LB corps, it seldom consisted of more than 5 available good players for four positions. By today's standard that is extraordinarily thin. On paper they had six, but every year one guy was out for the year, TJ bicep, then Tedy stroke, then Rosey hip.

Further proof that they are putting finishing touches on the LB corps rebuilding, is that Belichick is already starting to address the next rebuilding job, the Offensive line.

It is fine now, and will be so for a few more years. But he is already starting to obtain a next generation of Linemen to groom for that day, a few seasons from now. Volmer, Ohrnberger and Bussey, as well as freeing Nick Kaczur to move inside, are the beginning foundation of the next generation O-line...
AzPatsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 09:40 PM   #43
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan View Post
I fully believe that the LB corps is pretty good, even is some youngsters haven't made their marks fully. Mayo, Woods, Crable, Guyton, and even Redd, all have ideal size, and either truly rare, (all but...), or only good (Woods), speed & size. All save Redd, have shown flashes of talent. I didn't even include the high draft pick, smart & talented, Tyrone McKenzie among the newcomers, but he is out for the year, just like a vet from mid-decade. He would be the sixth youngster to go with three vet starters, Adalius, Paris and Tedy.
Thanks for mentioning McKenzie because I forgot about him being taken in the 3rd round. That makes it 3 LB's taken in the first three rounds since BB has been head coach.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan View Post
The only good Steeler Defensive lineman is almost as old a Willie McGinnest; and there is no one on the horizon to replace him.
Who is their only good D-lineman? Last time I checked, Aaron Smith (age 31) is a very good DE and Casey Hampton (age 33) is one of the best NT's in the game. Brett Keisel (age 30) is a decent DE. They drafted Ziggy Hood in the 1st round of this year's draft.

Willie McGinest is 37 years old. I'm not sure what roster your looking at.

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
Funny thing how it's the DL that makes the Patriots' 3-4 go, though.
Because that is all they have. When a team has to depend on a 3-4 DE to produce a pass rush, that's pretty pathetic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfaninpittsburgh View Post
Bro

Might want to check the age and recent injuries for that D-line. All are at or around 30 with injuries. It's a window thing.

Besides can anyone really say that the vaunted Steelers defense would ever keep Brady and Co under 30 points? The Cardinals offense tooled them all over the field. Too bad the 30th ranked defense on a 9-7 team couldn't get it done.
Check my responses again. I already mentioned that the Patriots are the one team that the Steelers defense can't hang with.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 06-26-2009 at 09:50 PM.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:05 PM   #44
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Because that is all they have. When a team has to depend on a 3-4 DE to produce a pass rush, that's pretty pathetic.
1) OLBs do a lot more than rush the passer.
2) We're 1 year removed from having the 2nd most sacks in the NFL.

DL is by far the most important part of a 2 gap 3-4. Great OLBs are fantastic to have, but also hard to get. Also bear in mind that BB knows exactly how to evaluate them: he had DeMarcus Ware rated as the best player in his draft. I'm sure you're just trying to stimulate conversation (being generous here), but your point is completely whack.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:26 PM   #45
In the Starting Line-up
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,003
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by apple strudel View Post
1) OLBs do a lot more than rush the passer.
2) We're 1 year removed from having the 2nd most sacks in the NFL.

DL is by far the most important part of a 2 gap 3-4. Great OLBs are fantastic to have, but also hard to get. Also bear in mind that BB knows exactly how to evaluate them: he had DeMarcus Ware rated as the best player in his draft. I'm sure you're just trying to stimulate conversation (being generous here), but your point is completely whack.
Really? 2007 is skewed because opposing teams offenses became predictable by throwing the ball the entire game. When teams are able to have a balanced offense against the Pats (2008), it was harder for them to get after the QB.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:33 PM   #46
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
apple strudel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,720
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Really? 2007 is skewed because opposing teams offenses became predictable by throwing the ball the entire game. When teams are able to have a balanced offense against the Pats (2008), it was harder for them to get after the QB.
Yeah and 2008 is skewed by the guy BB scouted and signed getting old and the other guy BB scouted and signed breaking the crap out of his arm. Oh yeah, and the solid cover corner BB drafted leaving for big bucks. Your point is completely whack. BB knows exactly what makes a good OLB and how to get them both by paying FA dollars, drafting them in the middle rounds, drafting them late, or (based on how he evaluated Ware) how to draft them early. The guy's not perfect, but compared to your argument he just discovered homomorphic cryptography.
apple strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:38 PM   #47
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Patjew's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shenzhen, China
Posts: 5,952
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HEY BRO! WHAT UP? View Post
Really? 2007 is skewed because opposing teams offenses became predictable by throwing the ball the entire game. When teams are able to have a balanced offense against the Pats (2008), it was harder for them to get after the QB.
It wasn't only that. The 2007 LB crew was very good. You make it sound like the LB's were crap after 2004 and BB never bothered rebuilding it. A unit consisting of Vrabel, Colvin, Bruschi, Seau and Vrabel is more-than-solid. That group was no embarassment; they made the cover of SI FWIW. Colvin's injury hurt them, but that unit and the D as a whole played very well, especially in the playoffs.
__________________
Ian bows to no one. He is like the love child of Chuck Norris and Adam Seward.
Patjew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:43 PM   #48
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
PatsBoy12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 915
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Why are you all continuing to entertain some of the more ridiculous notions? None of the back-and-forth is going to change his mind. He clearly feels that the LB's were trash after 2004 and BB knows nothing about how to evaluate new LB talent. Apparently, he's reserving his expertise for the right team to ring his phone and offer him a head coaching job so he can show BB how it's done.
PatsBoy12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 10:48 PM   #49
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Patjew's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shenzhen, China
Posts: 5,952
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsBoy12 View Post
Why are you all continuing to entertain some of the more ridiculous notions? None of the back-and-forth is going to change his mind. He clearly feels that the LB's were trash after 2004 and BB knows nothing about how to evaluate new LB talent. Apparently, he's reserving his expertise for the right team to ring his phone and offer him a head coaching job so he can show BB how it's done.
There's not much else to talk about, especially since the rap thread died away.
__________________
Ian bows to no one. He is like the love child of Chuck Norris and Adam Seward.
Patjew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 11:00 PM   #50
Viva Los Australia
 
ausbacker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,191
Default Re: Nice discussion of the rookies from Scout.com (public article)

It's some comments in threads like these that you truly understand the implications of success and the expectations in some people's heads of what should be instead of what is.

It's not called elite sport for nothing. Nothing is easy and more often than not takes time.
ausbacker is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
clay matthews, shawn crable

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426