Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2009, 08:43 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

From his latest column:

Quote:
The trade rumors about Oakland Raiders defensive end Derrick Burgess are real. So real, in fact, the Raiders asked the Patriots for their second-round pick this year, Sebastian Vollmer, and back-up quarterback Kevin O’Connell in exchange for Burgess. The Pats turned down that trade proposal, just as the Raiders have turned down a few of the Patriots’. New England remains interested in Burgess, but the prevailing thought in the NFL is that the Raiders will not trade him – they’re just making it seem that they’re making the effort. Burgess has made it clear to anyone who listens that he wants out.


The National Football Post | Sunday At The Post

Based on this, sounds like this trade will not happen. Burgess might force the issue though especially if feels that the Raiders are just jerking him around and going through the motions to look like they are trading him with no intention to do so.
Rob0729 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-24-2009, 08:51 AM   #2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 825
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

If the Raiders are asking for two players that are expected to make our 53-man roster, it seems clear to me they aren't realistically seeking to trade Burgess. They'd be lucky to get one 2nd round pick, and I think a 3rd + a 5th or 6th is a lot more likely.
tatepatsfan is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 08:55 AM   #3
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
stevedogc's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 733
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729 View Post
From his latest column:



The National Football Post | Sunday At The Post

Based on this, sounds like this trade will not happen. Burgess might force the issue though especially if feels that the Raiders are just jerking him around and going through the motions to look like they are trading him with no intention to do so.
Beat me to it. I was just about to post that myself. I agree that Burgess will not be coming here. If that is the Raiders starting point, I cant see them coming down enough to please the Pats. I wouldnt give up a 2nd rounder alone for Burgess, and they want 2 potential starters who are sign up, or will be, long term fopr cheap money. A third is the highest I would go for him. I wonder if the high price the Raiders are asking for Burgess is a result from the history between the Pats and Raiders. I remember reading a story where Al Davis told Lamont Jordan he did not want him signing with the Pats when he was released. I bet the price would be less for another team.
stevedogc is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 08:56 AM   #4
Banned
 

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 74
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by tatepatsfan View Post
If the Raiders are asking for two players that are expected to make our 53-man roster, it seems clear to me they aren't realistically seeking to trade Burgess. They'd be lucky to get one 2nd round pick, and I think a 3rd + a 5th or 6th is a lot more likely.
i say lets give woods and crable a shot im not up for giving a 2nd or 3rd for a 1 year rent a player we already have enough potential free agents on the roster next year
ivanfears is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 08:56 AM   #5
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,800
Blog Entries: 14
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

If that is indeed true a 2nd AND O'Connell and Vollmer.. they can wait and see Burgess rot...they are NOT serious at all..Al Davis demandinig that.. That creep can go down the tubes and see his franchise be worse than the Lions.. AT this point..I'd give up a 5th ONLY..F..Davis and the Raiders!!
Pats726 is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 09:02 AM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
mayoclinic's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,780
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedogc View Post
Beat me to it. I was just about to post that myself. I agree that Burgess will not be coming here. If that is the Raiders starting point, I cant see them coming down enough to please the Pats. I wouldnt give up a 2nd rounder alone for Burgess, and they want 2 potential starters who are sign up, or will be, long term fopr cheap money. A third is the highest I would go for him. I wonder if the high price the Raiders are asking for Burgess is a result from the history between the Pats and Raiders. I remember reading a story where Al Davis told Lamont Jordan he did not want him signing with the Pats when he was released. I bet the price would be less for another team.
I totally agree. That's a ridiculous trade. I wouldn't give up either O'Connell or Vollmer, much less both of them, at this juncture.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid

"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
mayoclinic is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 09:09 AM   #7
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 108
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

has anyone actually seen him play lately (since SB39)? cant remember the last raiders game i caught

Last edited by Lord_Reginald_III; 05-24-2009 at 09:09 AM..
Lord_Reginald_III is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 09:10 AM   #8
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,346
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

Although it was largely overlooked, Burgess' coach didn't make it sound like a trade was imminent as of a few days ago

http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_12414977
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 09:14 AM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,567
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

A 2, Vollmer, and O'Connell?

Hell no. . . . although I wonder what JaMarcus Russell will think when he hears that Davis was trying to snag the Pats' backup QB. . . .

On the flip side, that'd be a heck of a way to derail two promising careers before they get started.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 05-24-2009, 09:30 AM   #10
Practice Squad
 
Number 2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 161
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Michael Lombardi on the potential Burgess trade

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
A 2, Vollmer, and O'Connell?

Hell no. . . . although I wonder what JaMarcus Russell will think when he hears that Davis was trying to snag the Pats' backup QB. . . .

On the flip side, that'd be a heck of a way to derail two promising careers before they get started.
Those are my exact thoughts! Not to forget the also brought in Jeff Garcia in the off season.
Number 2 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Potential Trade partner in Saints? Warren94 Patriots Draft Talk 26 04-15-2008 10:41 PM
Potential Trade Scenario Ochmed Jones Patriots Draft Talk 11 01-22-2008 10:47 PM
Trade value for our WRs? Who - to where - and for what? JoeSixPat PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 43 07-23-2007 11:15 AM
MI6 Are The Lords Of the Drug Trade... Terry Glenn is a cowgirl Political Discussion 13 05-12-2007 06:19 PM
Continued mention of potential Graham trade JoeSixPat PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 7 06-12-2006 03:05 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563