NFL Sports Channel dissifies Richard Seymour - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2009, 02:30 PM   #1
JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
JSn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,449
Default NFL Sports Channel dissifies Richard Seymour

Evauluating the NFL’s Most Overrated and Underrated Players on Defense | NFL Sport Channel

Quote:
Defensive End

Most Overrated: Richard Seymour (New England Patriots)

A defensive end is supposed to get sacks. They should help out the passing game and contribute a little to the rushing game. I know this is probably the biggest shocker, but the fact is over this guys' career, he's struggled to get five sacks in a season.

He's only done it four years out of his eight year career. The most sacks he has accumulated in a single season is eight which he has done twice.

At 6'6" and 310 pounds, he's one of the biggest defensive ends in the NFL. New England runs a 3-4 scheme, but this guy could be a better fit in a 4-3. He is not a coverage guy. He struggles to stay with receivers and finds himself out of place too often.

If he were allowed to strictly be a defensive end instead of a hybrid, he could be much better.

Like Haynesworth, he struggles to stay healthy. He's only played two full seasons in eight.
Don't shoot the messenger. This is just someone's opinion.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JSn is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-03-2009, 02:39 PM   #2
Banned
 
HEY BRO! WHAT UP?'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,370
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

This guy obviously doesn't realize that DE's in a 3-4 don't normally get sacks. Take a look around the NFL and you will see that most 3-4 DE's have a low sack total. In fact, it's extremely rare if a DE has more than 5 sacks. This guy is a complete moron! Seymour finally got healthy and posted 8 sacks as a 3-4 DE, which is really outstanding. In addition, there really wasn't any help from his LB's to apply pressure as well. So what does that tell you? Seymour is great when healthy. Also, I don't agree that Seymour is injured all the time. He gets nicked up every now and then, but it's not ridiculous like this guy thinks. Seymour suffered one bad injury that kept him out for 6 weeks. I have said this before and I will say it again, when the Pats get OLB's that can rush the passer, it will free up Seymour and he will really dominate. When your 3-4 DE is your only hope for a pass rush, it's kind of hard to be consistent.

Last edited by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?; 04-03-2009 at 02:44 PM..
HEY BRO! WHAT UP? is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:40 PM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

Well there's someone who doesn't know what a DE's role in 3-4 defense is.

Having just tried to read the rest of his list it's clear he doesn't know anything about anything.

Last edited by Lampshade; 04-03-2009 at 02:43 PM..
Lampshade is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:43 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

Wow! So DEs in a two gap 3-4 system is supposed to get sacks?!? DEs in a two gap 3-4 system is supposed to help out only a little in the running game?!? Really?!?

Well, I guess if you are completely ignorant of the differences between a 4-3 DE and a 3-4 DE like this author is, I guess you could make a valid point.

I do think it is funny that he would be a better fit in a 4-3 when they are evaluating Seymour on the criteria of a 4-3 player, not a 3-4 one.
Rob0729 is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:43 PM   #5
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,981
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

the article is meant to inflame.......why else would nobody put their name on it?
tanked_as_usual is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:47 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
Sicilian's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 3,853
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

To be fair to this guy, he's clearly basing his football knowledge on Madden where, unless your D-Lineman picks up 10+ sacks, he never progresses in his abilities
Sicilian is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:53 PM   #7
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,744
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

Uh....

Pats' DEs are supposed to take up two blockers so that the LBs can roam.

Yet this writer criticizes them based on sack numbers?

Why doesn't he start condemning Brady for his rushing numbers?
xmarkd400x is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:54 PM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
Nordberg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 674
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

The guy obviously doesn't know that there is a difference between a 4-3 and a 3-4 in regards to gap responsibility.

I am willing to bet the list is small with 10+ sack DE's that have played in a 3-4 in NFL history.

Richard Seymour Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com

Seymour had his second best year as a pro last year.
Nordberg is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:54 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Rob0729's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25,367
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

BTW, Howie Long made the HOF with an average of 6.5 sacks a season. Dan Hampton averaged 5.18 sacks a season in his HOF career (granted he played DT for part of it). So based on this article, neither deserved to be in.

Ironically, sack machine DEs like Kevin Greene and Derrick Thomas struggle to get into the HOF. Greene can't get in and Thomas just got in after five years of eligibility.
Rob0729 is offline  
Old 04-03-2009, 02:56 PM   #10
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
BadMoFo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killudelphia
Posts: 5,331
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: NFL Sports Channel Dissifies Richard Seymour

Why's the guy saying he struggles in coverage and can't stick with a receiver? Does he realize what a defensive end is?
BadMoFo is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charger center Harwick calls out Richard Seymour... [mergedx2] SWelker PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 112 01-21-2008 08:14 PM
Question/Opinion on Richard Seymour and Ty Warren Pats_2007 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 10 01-19-2008 02:42 PM
2007 Training Camp: List of missed practices, other notes pats1 Patriots 2007 Training Camp Reports and Photos 5 08-15-2007 05:32 PM
Gay, Faulk, Hill, and Alexander to coach LSU spring game pats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 56 03-24-2007 10:11 PM
The reason why Marquise Hill is still on this team midwestpatsfan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 150 02-16-2007 06:06 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563