ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobs My Uncle
I don't think the Jets can afford to hire even a new ballboy. But the Bucs, the Texans, the Vikes, the Titans, the Lions (Dallas' pick), maybe the Bears, the Eagles ........
If Detroit signs Cassel, wouldn't they have to give up their own picks?
__________________
Andre Tippett #56 Greatest Ever!
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobs My Uncle
The key here is that the team needs to pounce on Cassel PRIOR to him signing his tag tender BEFORE he becomes a contracted player to and thus, under control of, the Pats.
As I understand it, Cassel is still under contract to the Patriots until the end of the league year. The time period for franchise player designation ends before the league year. Whether or not he's franchised, he will be under the Patriots' "control" until the beginning of the league year (March 2, I believe). If and when he is franchised, the Patriots would receive compensation if he's signed by another team, which cannot happen until the beginning of the league year unless the Patriots allow permission, something they likely wouldn't do unless a sign/trade arrangement has been worked out.
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
What is interesting is that in this scenario, Cassel will get a bigger payday, and the Pats will get more high picks, than the trade scenario. A win-win for us.
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Clearly, your analysis proves that the upper bound on the value the Pats receive for Cassell is two first-round picks.
It further suggests that Cassell has a lot of control over where he ends up. After all, if he isn't willing to sign a long-term deal with a team, it would take an odd and risky series of events for him to wind up there.
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mainefan
What are the tampering rules?
If I'm not mistaken, as soon as a team offers a franchise tender, the player is free to negotiate with other teams until he signs the tender.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedogc
The Jets have no money to deal with. The Panthers are below the cap, but not by much and have two huge UFA in Gross and Peppers. Although, I read somewhere that cutting Delhomne would save them 6 million in cap space. But I think it would be to tight for them. And the Lions, KC and SF all have draft picks to high in rnd 1 and are unlikely to improve a great deal next season. Resulting in their 2010 pick being in the top 10. I cant see a team giving up 2 top 10 picks for Cassel.
As a not-so-minor point--whatever team signs Cassel would need to have $14M in cap space at the time they sign him (although they would be able to restructure contracts to make it work).[/QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patsrock
If Detroit signs Cassel, wouldn't they have to give up their own picks?
Yes. You cannot use a lower pick than your own, but you can use a higher one (e.g., the Pats can use SD's pick for a second-round tender).
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
As a not-so-minor point--whatever team signs Cassel would need to have $14M in cap space at the time they sign him (although they would be able to restructure contracts to make it work).
Well that really narrows down the possibilities then.
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
As a not-so-minor point--whatever team signs Cassel would need to have $14M in cap space at the time they sign him (although they would be able to restructure contracts to make it work).
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick4
Well that really narrows down the possibilities then.
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae
Quick question.......
With the possible exception of the Jets, would anyone care what team Cassel signed with if it brought back 2 first round picks?
I'll field it : don't care who gets him (for two #1s). Though I would say that if he went to an NFC team, I'd prefer that EVEN if it was for a #1 & #2 than to a division rival. Sure, we hate the Jets more... but how would it feel to go 1-1 vs Miami and lose out another tie-breaker with Cassel as QB (not that they need a QB, but in the spirit of the question) ?
Re: The Patriots won't get an opportunity to "trade" Cassel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobs My Uncle
The biggest restriction (to Cassel's agent) is relinquishing control of the situation over to the Pats. They do this the second they sign the tender and contract him to the Pats.
But Cassel has to agree to a deal in principle with his new team before a trade happens regardless. Nobody's going to fork over significant draft picks to have Cassel play under the one-year franchise contract. And he's free to negotiate, or not, with any team he wants.
So suppose Cassel is tagged, thus free to negotiate with any team, and he comes to terms with the team of his choice. Why on Earth would that team decide to fork over 2 firsts instead of approaching the Patriots to negotiate a lower level of compensation?