BradyManny

Maybe its just b/c we've heard no official news, or maybe its b/c big injuries have become the norm this season, but this forum is taking the AD news in stride.

I heard Felger on CSN last nite saying losing AD could be the straw that broke the back. I'm not ready to go that far, but I will say that I am very anxious to see how the team plays Thursday nite without him. They did fine in the second half against the Bills without him, I have a lot of faith in Pierre Woods, but to me, its not the drop off in play and production so much as the drop off in versatility. Every package the Patriots implemented this season not only included AD, but hinged upon AD's versatility.

I dunno, I'm usually as homerific as they come, but if AD is really IR'd, I think I'm going to be nearly as depressed as I was when I heard the official Brady news. My current state of mind thinking that AD is out for the year is about "you've got to be ******ing kidding me", but it any team can deal with this kind of adversity, its gotta be the Pats.


I went with option #2, though like I said, I'm anxious to see them prove on Thursday that option #1 is not the case.

bakes781

I agree it is a HUGE loss. He was clearly the best pass rusher on a team that wasn't very good at getting to the QB as it was.

__________________

patsgo

if felger said that i guess i need to sell all my tickets, that guy is so smart, thanks for the felger up date,question for you, name something felger has ever been right on??? stop watching the fag!

BradyManny

It wasn't just that he was the best pass rusher, he's also good at coverage, good against the run. He can play inside, outside. They lined him up in the slot against Dallas Clark so they could stay in their base 3-4 against Indy. They've used him to cover TEs, RBs, rush the passer, everything. Vrabel has a similar level of versatility, but not quite as good as AD, mainly b/c of the difference in speed.

Still, I go with option #2 for now. This team just needs some Ubuntu like the Celts right now. We'll see.

BradyManny

Nice...could've gone without the derogatory slur, but OK...

Felger has been a lot more reasonable this year, and I don't think he was just trying to be a negative nancy. Curran was pretty much on the same page and summed it up pretty well when he said the bottom line is that they'll have to strip down the D a little bit.

bakes781

They can still make the playoffs, but I think the Pats are one & done in the post season.

__________________

patsgo

ya they arent telling us anything we dont know, thats football strap them on and go play,

Rob0729

It's a big loss. But this team has a long history of overcoming big injury losses on the defensive side of the ball. Whether it is Law in 2004, Harrison in 2005, Seymour for stretches in recent years most notably the first six games last year, Ted Washington, etc.

The team clearly isn't as good as it was starting the game on this past Sunday, but I have faith in Belichick to figure out a way to hide the weakness and overcome it. If we have weathered the storm without Brady, I think we can figure out a way to overcome the loss of Thomas. It wasn't like the defense fell apart after Thomas went out on Sunday.

PATRIOTSFANINPA

Pierre Wodds has doen nothing special thus far to think he is an adequate replacement,Its up to the 6 others around and in front of him to make him look decent

ALP

for the defense, this was probably the second worst injury possible (after wilfork)

and its greatly more effective then maroney and harrison combined...


its a HUGE loss....and its the first time this season i cant see us overcome it w/o serious concequences...

lets hope woods or redd are good....

__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty

Then I moved away and they haven't won since

...now I'm moving back, and a Lombardi I predict