Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
What, the Pats never won ugly, The KC game was ugly, but good teams find a way to win and the final drive for the winning score by the Jets was encouraging from a get it done when you need to type of team.
Edit: the loss in Oakland, I am still not over.
The Pats have won ugly, but they haven't almost lost to a team as bad as the Chiefs who were lead by Tyler Thigpen who the Jets allowed to complete 69.4% of his passes for 280 yards and 2 TDs and no INTs. That guy sucks. Also, the Pats haven't had a three game stretch where they struggled against three of the worst teams in the league in a long, long time.
I was just countering that the Jets are playing well. The Jets have as many or more flaws than the Patriots. They struggle against the pass as much as the Pats, they can't run the ball effectively and consistently, Favre turns over the ball far too much, etc. That is not playing well at least when you compare them to the Pats.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 206
Seriously, what team do you root for? You clearly are not a Pats fan.
The Pats proved in 2001 that they can dink and dunk all the way to the Super Bowl. Cassel isn't Brady, but Brady wasn't Brady of the last five years in 2001. Also, the Pats will get back Jordan and Morris which will take pressure off the passing game and allow Cassel to throw deeper.
I'm sure when you are proven wrong in a few weeks, you will biatch about something else. You complainers always do.
There's a pretty consistent group of people making the complaints week after week. It doesn't change much when the team is winning, either, because they find individual issues to complain about. Even when they are proven wrong, they just lie in the weeds and bring up the same disproved arguments time and again.
__________________
When it comes to the Koolaid, take sips not chugs.
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
You are correct. The Pats would have to finish 2-4 and that would include a loss to the Raiders, which I really don't see happening.
Yeah, if Robinson's prediction is that in a week from now that the Pats are 7-3, I cannot see the Pats going worse than 3-3 down the stretch. They don't have the easiest schedule, but it definitely isn't the hardest.
I actually think the Pats win against the Cards if nothing else that it is an East Coast game at 1 PM in December. The Cards are not a great road team and have shown they struggle quite a bit with the time zone difference of the East Coast.
I think the Seahawks will have packed it in by the time the Pats meet them with a lame duck HC. The thing the Hawks have going for them is that it is in their stadium (but will the crowd be a factor with how bad they are).
I also think they beat at least Oakland. So if Robinson is right about 7-3, that is 10-6 right there. I still think this team can go 11-5 or 12-4.
There's a pretty consistent group of people making the complaints week after week. It doesn't change much when the team is winning, either, because they find individual issues to complain about. Even when they are proven wrong, they just lie in the weeds and bring up the same disproved arguments time and again.
Some people are never happy unless the Pats are undefeated and winning by three TDs. Even then there are still the lunatic fringe who complain.
I see improvements on both sides of the ball week after week on this team. Not that there aren't things that need to be improved, but the Pats seem to getting stronger as the season goes along. While other teams are peaking or have already peaked. That means the Pats have a really good shot at playing their best football in December and hopefully January. I am still cautiously optimistic.
10-6 is the best possible scenario for the Pats. I think 9-7 is more realistic. Home to Pitt, @ Buffalo, @ MIA, home to ARIZ, and home to NYJ are all extremely tough matchups given the health status of our team
This is what I envision happening over the next 3 weeks.
Pats win over Buffalo comfortably by 7 pts. No need for beta blockers or defibrillators this weekend. Nice afternoon game to just chill.
Pats win a cardiac game against Broadway Brett
Pats are outclassed in Miami 27-10
The Miami loss won't matter, I expect the Fins to win this division. The key is to win this tiebreaker advantage with the Jets because if the Pats finish 9-7 and so do NYJ, Pats are in and Jets are out. Of course thanks to Jabar, we have Indy lurking so we need to keep an eye on them in the second half.
Last edited by bostonia3333; 11-07-2008 at 11:25 AM.
There's a pretty consistent group of people making the complaints week after week. It doesn't change much when the team is winning, either, because they find individual issues to complain about. Even when they are proven wrong, they just lie in the weeds and bring up the same disproved arguments time and again.
Several of the dirty dozen are currently lying in the weeds posting less. Just wait until Cassel actually has his bad game of the season throwing 3 picks and we lose. Expect LOTS of sudden posts. I blame the fantasy Football mentality.
I'm optimistic about Sunday and the season, though concerned about our lack of health at RB and DB.
the pats arent going to win a lot of games with that pass defense, lack of rush, no running game and no vertical passing game
Where are you getting your info??:
Pats are #16 vs pass, ahead of Jets and Dolphins and slightly behind the Bills in the middle of the pack: NFL Stats: by Team Category
and also the Pats are the 7th best rushing team in the league, which is pretty damn good especially considering all the injuries sustained at RB: NFL Stats: by Team Category
The Jets had a lack of rush until recently as well, then they started blitzing more. I believe the Pats will do the same in the 2nd half of the season and with Seymour coming on strong and getting back to BigSey of old the defense will improve coming down the stretch.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
Aristotle
"Any one can hold the helm when the sea is calm."
Publilius Syrus
Pats are #16 vs pass, ahead of Jets and Dolphins and slightly behind the Bills in the middle of the pack: NFL Stats: by Team Category
and also the Pats are the 7th best rushing team in the league, which is pretty damn good especially considering all the injuries sustained at RB: NFL Stats: by Team Category
The Jets had a lack of rush until recently as well, then they started blitzing more. I believe the Pats will do the same in the 2nd half of the season and with Seymour coming on strong and getting back to BigSey of old the defense will improve coming down the stretch.
Sssssssshhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! Facts are not allowed in an argument with Faux Pats Fans. Otherwise, their overly negative rants that aren't supported by anything other than their extreme dislike for the Pats look really silly. We don't want that to happen.
BTW, the crappy Pats' rushing offense has the most yards out of any team in the AFC East.
mark my words cassell will come down to earth, other teams will take away the 3 to 5 yard passes, when that happens hell be forced to go down field, he hasnt proven he can do that other than a couple of hail marys to moss
What's stopped them from taking away Cassel's short passes to this point?? Fact is with Randy Moss teams have to play at least one safety over the top at all times to take him away. Also you might want to check the numbers on Cassel he's right there in terms of avg pass with Favre, Roethlisberger, Eli and Peyton Manning and the star everyone wanted to bring in to replace him Garcia: NFL Stats: by Player Category
Your have no facts to back your weak arguments, if you want to be and stay negative become a Raiders or Lions fan.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
Aristotle
"Any one can hold the helm when the sea is calm."
Publilius Syrus