ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Unless Moss is going to throw a TD to Gostkowski ...
I'd pay $100 just to see that happen for real.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
One day people will realize that someone can make different decisions than they would have and still have those decisions not be wrong, even if they don't pan out.
Sadly, given the gibberish I've seen all over the board ever since the game last night, those people will probably not be Patriots fans.
So did you agree with the coaching staff's decisions last night? Did you agree with going for 2 midway through the third? The 12th man challenge? The third timeout? Arguments can be made either way... Personally, I felt that these were bad decisions, and even had the outcome been different, would still feel that way.
BB is the best coach in the league today, and one of the best of all time. One hiccup by him and his staff doesn't even come close to diminishing that, obviously. But it's not a crime to second guess those decisions, especially given how "non-BB" like they are.
I'm as diehard a Patriots fan as there can be, and I don't think questioning the game management (NOT the gameplan, which was extraordinary) makes me any less so....
One day people will realize that someone can make different decisions than they would have and still have those decisions not be wrong, even if they don't pan out.
Sadly, given the gibberish I've seen all over the board ever since the game last night, those people will probably not be Patriots fans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFPatsFan12
So did you agree with the coaching staff's decisions last night? Did you agree with going for 2 midway through the third? The 12th man challenge? The third timeout? Arguments can be made either way... Personally, I felt that these were bad decisions, and even had the outcome been different, would still feel that way.
I'm really not sure where your issue is here. Not one of those decisions was a 'bad' decision. I would have thrown the challenge if I thought the Colts had 12 men on the field, I wouldn't have called the timeout on 4th down, and I didn't like the decision to go for 2.
However, there's a difference between my preferring different actions and my claiming the actions taken were "wrong". Each of the actions you point to in the quoted post have a perfectly reasonable reason behind them, even if I'd have done it differently.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
I'm really not sure where your issue is here. Not one of those decisions was a 'bad' decision. I would have thrown the challenge if I thought the Colts had 12 men on the field, I wouldn't have called the timeout on 4th down, and I didn't like the decision to go for 2.
However, there's a difference between my preferring different actions and my claiming the actions taken were "wrong". Each of the actions you point to in the quoted post have a perfectly reasonable reason behind them, even if I'd have done it differently.
Except that basic tenets of football...especialy Bill Belichick football:
1) Go for it on 4th and short in the red zone when on the road
2) Don't challenge plays for minimal effect
3) Don't chase points.
Except that basic tenets of football...especialy Bill Belichick football:
1) Go for it on 4th and short in the red zone when on the road
2) Don't challenge plays for minimal effect
3) Don't chase points.
Let me put this gently.
You need to realize that those are NOT the basic tenets of football, and they are NOT the basic tenets of Bill Belichick football.
Also, you're wrong on the challenge when you call it minimal, since the difference was 2nd and 10 vs. 1st and 5 in a possession style of game.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
You need to realize that those are NOT the basic tenets of football, and they are NOT the basic tenets of Bill Belichick football.
Also, you're wrong on the challenge when you call it minimal, since the difference was 2nd and 10 vs. 1st and 5 in a possession style of game.
What is wrong with my list and why is it wrong? I have heard Belichick say the exact things I have listed on numerous occassions throughout the years he has coached this team. Perhaps you aren't paying attention or hear instead your own opinions which appear to change depending on whatever Belichick does or does not do on Sunday.
I have heard Belichick say that he likes to go for it on 4th and 1, in the red zone on the road because it helps take the crowd out of it and its important to get touchdowns over field goals, especially on the road and when playing high powered offenses like the colts
I have heard Belichick talk about why he has challeneged things in the past or why he did not challeng something in the past and he always has talked about the reward vs the risk. Specifically about where on the field the team is, how many yards are at stake and whether points are involved.
As for chasing points, he generally hasn't been one to go for two unless it is required.
Perhaps you should listen more carefully the next time Belichick speaks about these issues. Sure, he gave reasons for why he did all those thing in last nights press conference, but IMO Belichick from two years ago would have biatch slapped Belichick from last nights game.
What is wrong with my list and why is it wrong? I have heard Belichick say the exact things I have listed on numerous occassions throughout the years he has coached this team. Perhaps you aren't paying attention or hear instead your own opinions which appear to change depending on whatever Belichick does or does not do on Sunday.
I have heard Belichick say that he likes to go for it on 4th and 1, in the red zone on the road because it helps take the crowd out of it and its important to get touchdowns over field goals, especially on the road and when playing high powered offenses like the colts
I have heard Belichick talk about why he has challeneged things in the past or why he did not challeng something in the past and he always has talked about the reward vs the risk. Specifically about where on the field the team is, how many yards are at stake and whether points are involved.
As for chasing points, he generally hasn't been one to go for two unless it is required.
Perhaps you should listen more carefully the next time Belichick speaks about these issues. Sure, he gave reasons for why he did all those thing in last nights press conference, but IMO Belichick from two years ago would have biatch slapped Belichick from last nights game.
Your arguments make my point. There's a difference between "always" and "sometimes". Of course, you seem to be overlooking other obvious differences, like there being a difference between Cassel and Brady.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
I disagree, but aparently I disagree with a lot of things you write. Meh, whatever.
At least you are a pats fan, if you were a Jets fan it would be even more annoying. Homers aren't so bad if they are homers for the team you root for.
I'm not a homer, and I'm not playing one at the moment. I simply understand that there is a difference between ALTERNATE strategy and tactics, and WRONG strategy and tactics.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
I'm not a homer, and I'm not playing one at the moment. I simply understand that there is a difference between ALTERNATE strategy and tactics, and WRONG strategy and tactics.
If Dungy, Mangini, Herm Edwards, Norv Turner, or any other NFL coaches used these "alternate" strategies, this board would be full of laughter. Still, I would NOT trade BB for any other coach.
It is all semantic, we both disagreed with BB's decisions or "did not preferred his alternate strategies".
Hopefully, BB and the team let this game go quickly and focus on winning a crucial AFCE game.
__________________
I am a full-time lurker with the occasional urge to release my opinions or questions to the public. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by jgpatriot; 11-03-2008 at 11:43 AM..