09-15-2008, 10:30 AM
|
#5
|
|
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,297
|
Re: Why don't we run Maroney outside more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks
Maroney's so-called "poor production" is missing a critical measurement - the Pats scored on their first two drives with Maroney running the ball. After he left the game with a reported shoulder injury, it took Meriweather's interception to get the Pats into scoring position again. Maroney forced the Jesters to defend the run, an element apparently lost once it was just Morris and Faulk running the rock.
The outside zone or "stretch" play the Colts use is also run by New England. If you have a team who sets the edge well and turns the run back inside it isn't as effective - think back to the NE 2003 & 2004 defenses shutting down the Colts in the playoffs. NE ran inside zone plays aganst the Jesters, partly, I'm sure, because the stronger run blockers tend to be Mankins, Koppin, and Neal (Yates in this case). With the loss of Graham, the NE TEs haven't been as effective blocking - that may be a factor. It's also a slower developing play, with the increase in defensive speed within the league, that makes it a more difficult play to execute.
|
Good points all around.
Again, I wasn't trying to say something negative about Maroney here - I thought he gained as much yardage as possible on every carry he had. He was making good cuts and making something out of nothing a lot. There were a lot of green jerseys around him. I'm just trying to think of a way they can get Maroney some open space to work in.
Last edited by BradyManny; 09-15-2008 at 10:32 AM..
|
|
|