More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette? - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree15Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2013, 06:38 AM   #21
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
IllegalContact's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,038
My Mood: Amused
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
We have no reason to believe Demps is worth anything either.
yes we do.....

although I disagree with the previous post.....ballard has already shown to be an effective TE, but just like Bequette, he is at a position that has talent and/or depth......bequette is going to have to work his way past others for even a decent opportunity.....
__________________
“ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
IllegalContact is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-13-2013, 09:00 AM   #22
Rookie
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 15
My Mood: Busy
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Most intriguing has to be Demps. Though he will only really be a punt returner/kick returner, he could turn out to be an X factor
fnordcircle likes this.
patriot1136 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 09:47 AM   #23
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 559
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Ill go with Ballard. He' the only one who has done something in the pro's. if he can return to form (a big if as his injury was severe) the 3 TE sets present some intriguing possibilities. Imagine the D packing the box only to motion Vereen and Hernandez out wide and forcing a thumper LB into coverage.

demps was a decent / good college player but nothing special and certainly has some durability concerns at his weight. Bequette looks like a guy who made the most of what he has but just doesn't have the required size / strength for the NFL
ay-yo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 10:19 AM   #24
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,842
My Mood: Doh
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Demps by a mile, IMO. The other guys, in an ideal scenario, are backups at best who are only useful as injury replacements or to spell better players at the back end of a rotation. If Demps can become a dynamic kick returner, then he'll have instant value in a very big way. If he manages to take over punt returns too (far less likely - people sometimes underestimate how different the two roles are, I think), then all the better.
fnordcircle and Deus Irae like this.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BradyFTW! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 10:21 AM   #25
In the Starting Line-up
 
DocHoliday's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,137
My Mood: Aggressive
Default More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard,Demps or Bequette?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
Demps by a mile, IMO. The other guys, in an ideal scenario, are backups at best who are only useful as injury replacements or to spell better players at the back end of a rotation. If Demps can become a dynamic kick returner, then he'll have instant value in a very big way. If he manages to take over punt returns too (far less likely - people sometimes underestimate how different the two roles are, I think), then all the better.
Yeah, regarding punts I think it's hard to improve on Edelman in that regard.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The Patriots have been overachievers the past two years. It doesn't have the talent to compensate for injuries, and it wins so much because it puts in 99% effort in the regular season and plays with terrific schemes to mask its deficiencies.

But in the playoffs a good team at 99% will not beat emotional, talented teams that play at 100%. It's what happened against the Giants in 2011 and the Ravens in 2012.
DocHoliday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 10:22 AM   #26
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,842
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard,Demps or Bequette

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisR2223 View Post
My vote is all 3 if we have another tight end who can be a serious threat in the pass game and compliment Gronk allowing us to be more creative with Hernandez snaps thats a huge asset.
If Demps can be a electric returner a threat to go cj spiller like everytime he touched the ball.
If he can turn a 1 yd pass to 15 that be huge.

If Bequette plays with the motor and intensity he did in college yet hones his skills with his leverage and pass rush forte at worst we have someone who can push Ninko for snaps at best we have a poor man's Jared Allen.
All possible huge assets in my opinion.
*a homeless man's Jared Allen.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BradyFTW! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 10:25 AM   #27
All Pro Poster
 
JackBauer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 12,997
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Demps, if only for the reason that our return game has been the nut low for what seems like forever now, and I'm intrigued at the possibility that might finally change.
fnordcircle and Deus Irae like this.
JackBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 10:41 AM   #28
In the Starting Line-up
 
everlong's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Marshfield
Posts: 3,831
Blog Entries: 1
My Mood: Dead
Send a message via Yahoo to everlong
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

For the upside Demps.

If Hernandez takes the next step to being a big WR and goes to the slot taking up Welker's reps should he not be retained I think we'll still see quite a bit of 2-TE sets with Gronk and Ballard. I can see Hernandez looking a bit more like Bolden in that role.

Considering Francis beat out Bequette it may be a make it or break it camp for him as the third round curse continues. I'm not sure I saw anything that makes me think wow with another off season in the system he'll make a jump.

I would add Armstead to the list. I'm really interested to see if he can come in and have Cameron Wake (different position but still) type of impact.
__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."

There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
everlong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 10:46 AM   #29
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,842
My Mood: Doh
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHoliday View Post
Yeah, regarding punts I think it's hard to improve on Edelman in that regard.
Edelman is definitely a good punt returner, but there are a couple of factors at work there:

1) The Pats may not re-sign him
2) Even if they do, he's injured very frequently, and I hate having Welker back there fielding punts when he is. Welker's 32- time to start thinking about limiting his hits, and PRs are a good place to start, since it's the one play where he's standing still and the other guys have a 30+ yard running start as they bear down on him. Not to mention that Welker might not be back either.
3) In an ideal world, it's great to have a punt returner with real breakaway speed who can make game-changing touchdown returns (see: Trindon Holliday, Jacoby Jones, Desean Jackson, etc.)

My guess is that Demps will be given a shot at returning punts in the preseason, much like Bolden was last year. From there, we'll see what happens. He can't be any worse than Bolden was at it, at least.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
BradyFTW! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2013, 11:45 AM   #30
In the Starting Line-up
 
chris_in_sunnyvale's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,056
Blog Entries: 3
My Mood: Flirty
Default re: More intriguing prospect into 2013 - Ballard, Demps or Bequette?

Didn't Bequette see the field in a few of the blowouts (1st Bills game, Rams game, Colts game)? If memory serves me well and it was him, he looked awful. Couldn't disengage from the lineman, was easily held at bay.

For so few snaps, the guy who showed flashes was Trevor Scott. He developed a reputation as a one-trick pony of speed off the edge and nothing else, but in that game 1 vs. Tennessee he lined up over the right guard and destroyed him while putting on heavy pressure.

With an offseason of continued development, I'd pin my DL depth on a guy like Scott over Bequette making the roster.

Regards,
Chris
chris_in_sunnyvale is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566