Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft - Page 6 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

View Poll Results: Rate the Patriots' 2010 draft
A+ 47 40.17%
A 45 38.46%
A– 20 17.09%
B+ 3 2.56%
B 1 0.85%
B– or less 1 0.85%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree35Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2013, 09:28 AM   #51
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 477
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

Mesko single handedly won us the Ravens game a couple seasons ago (in OT?).

Mesko is a great punter. It's just that the Patriots go 3 and out less than any other team in the league so it's rare that he has the opportunity to just rip it and kick it as far as he can (like a team like the Raiders). He usually is punting at best, from his own 40, and it'd probably be just as likely the opponents 40 as his own.

I wouldn't put him top 3, but he's certainly approaching top 5.
ctpatsfan77 likes this.
tonyto3690 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-10-2013, 10:20 AM   #52
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
CheeseMonkeys's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Roch NH
Posts: 1,797
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

The Taylor Price pick is the difference of this draft being an A instead of an A+. The Cunningham pick wasn't great but he's still on the team and has made some plays.

I wouldn't say that you have to nail all of your picks to get an A+ but I think all of your top picks should prove to be somewhat productive players.

Hern
Gronk
Devin
Spikes
Mesko

Also, It bugs me that some people here are talking about the "obvious picks". As if they should have been the ones drafting the players since they are so knowledgeable on scouting draft prospects. They weren't obvious back in April 2010.
__________________
“These players, a lot of other people didn't believe in them, but they believe in themselves. And that is all that matters.” - Bill Belichick
CheeseMonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 10:36 AM   #53
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
Patsfanin Philly's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suburban Philly via Boston
Posts: 5,978
My Mood: Blah
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
Ask a guy like Tannenbaum how important it is not to blow draft picks. The "could have had...." is a way of seeing blown picks in light of the available talent in that year's draft..

In one respect courtesy of Tannenbaum, you can add Woodhead to that list, even though he was picked up after being cut by the Jets. He outplayed McKnight in training camp but Ryan/Tannenbaum weren't about to cut their 4th rounder in favor of an UDFA when they only had 4 picks....
__________________
Um, Mr. Brady, can we line up?
Patsfanin Philly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 01:19 PM   #54
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 717
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

A+ draft. Can't expect much better.

Best TE in the league. (Gronk)
One of the best WR/TE/RB hybrid (Hernandez)
Emerging safety (McCourty)
One of the best punters in the league (Mesko)
One of the best run defending LBs in the league (Spikes)
SyN65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 01:44 PM   #55
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,201
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Claremonster View Post
Ted Larsen should have never been cut either.
While I felt at the time that Larsen should have been retained over Nick Kaczur, on the other hand had that been the case then there would not have been room on the roster to sign Donald Thomas (or Nick McDonald). It's about an even trade-off when you consider the roster opening that releasing Larsen created.
jmt57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 01:47 PM   #56
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,114
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

I'd rather have had G/C Larsen than G/C McDonald.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmt57 View Post
While I felt at the time that Larsen should have been retained over Nick Kaczur, on the other hand had that been the case then there would not have been room on the roster to sign Donald Thomas (or Nick McDonald). It's about an even trade-off when you consider the roster opening that releasing Larsen created.
mgteich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 02:22 PM   #57
Moderator
 
jmt57's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,201
Blog Entries: 20
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
I'd rather have had G/C Larsen than G/C McDonald.
A year ago I would have disagreed, but not today; McDonald did not progress as I had hoped in 2012. How much of that was from an early training camp injury, who knows; hopefully he can get back on track in 2013. Would be nice to see McDonald make a step forward the way that Thomas did in 2012; Thomas played the best of the three last year.

On a side note Larsen's base salary for 2013 increased to $1.323 million based on incentives (I would assume playing time) in his original contract. larsen saw plenty of playing time because both Carl Nicks and Davin Joseph went on IR; barring another major injury, Larsen will likely be back on the bench.
captain stone likes this.
jmt57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 04:49 PM   #58
In the Starting Line-up
 
Froob's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,741
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

A+ easily. Gronk will probably become a Hall of Famer if injuries don't ruin him. Hernandez is a top 5 TE at least. Spikes is a very good linebacker who inspires others to play better. McCourty is one of the better cover safeties in the league I'd say. Mesko is pretty good, Cunningham is an okay player just drafted way too high.
__________________
Jersey here we come!(and not to play the jesters
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
)

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Froob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 09:22 PM   #59
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 877
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

F terrible draft didnt get any big tall fast physical receivers, a big safety who can lay the wood, or 3 darrelle revis's absolutley garbage.
__________________
the patsssssssss
patriotsdynasty12189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 11:57 PM   #60
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,154
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: Three years out—rate the 2010 Patriots draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob0729 View Post
First, you are complaining about the Pats taking a punter in a fifth round and continuing to make a case for a back up WR (your own words) in the second round. I said there are better choices in the second round other than Cunningham (Lee was my choice), but I disagree on Tate.

Second, just because Tate succeeded in a similar system in college doesn't mean he would succeed in the Pros. Prior to the draft, there was a lot of doubt that would succeed in the Pros no matter what system he was in. The Pats could have gotten a better #3 WR in later rounds. Eric Decker (3rd round) and Antonio Brown (6th round) were both drafted after Tate and are better receivers than Tate.

Third, plenty of teams draft a punter in the 5th round or higher. Here are all the teams that drafted punters drafted in the 5th round or higher over the last decade:
  • This year, the Jags drafted one in the third round.
  • In 2009, both the Bengals and Saints drafted a punter in the 5th round.
  • In 2007, both the Steelers and Jags drafted a punter in the 4th round. In 2005, the Chiefs drafted on in the 3rd round.
  • In 2004, the Packers drafted one in the 3rd round.
  • In 2003, the Chargers drafted on in the 5th.
  • In 2002, the Ravens drafted one in the 4th.

DraftHistory.com

So that is eight teams drafting nine punters over the last decade in the same round or higher as the Pats when they took Mesko. Considering teams only have one punter and a punter's career (even for an average one) is over a decade long, that is a lot of punters drafted in the fifth round or higher.

Fourth, Mesko is better than you give him credit for. He does a pretty good job getting the ball inside the 20 and boots it when he needs to. There is no such thing as a coffin kicker in the NFL anymore. Mesko's numbers suffer from the Pats' offense that scores on more drives than most teams and, when they are forced to punt, they are kicking closer to midfield or on the other side of the field more often than other teams.
Fair enough points re Mesko, though I still disagree re Golden Tate.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Three Years of Drop Rate: Wide Receivers pherein PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 07-02-2012 10:02 PM
Rate the whole draft ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 48 05-02-2011 01:50 PM
From 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) Rate the 2010 Patriots team PATRIOTSFANINPA PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 26 09-07-2010 03:21 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC