ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer
In lieu of signing Talib?
And drafting the Honey Badger late. Sign Talib, line him and Dennard up outside, slide Mathieu in the slot, and line up Reed and Elam deep, and this pass defense is great, not to mention you have two safeties that are superior in run support. If not Reed, then I'll gladly settle for a McCourty/Elam duo.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
CREDIT - Sicilian
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by patsinthesnow
The problem is Mccourty is a great zone corner and Dennard is a great man/press corner. We know for a fact Mccourty can't play man, and Dennard struggled in zone this year.
That is why McCourty is a safety now and excels at that position.
Ed Reed at 35 is still 3 times better than any of the safeties we've had since Rodney.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
And drafting the Honey Badger late. Sign Talib, line him and Dennard up outside, slide Mathieu in the slot, and line up Reed and Elam deep, and this pass defense is great, not to mention you have two safeties that are superior in run support.
Donde esta McCourty in this scenario?
On the broader point, I agree: I wouldn't mind Reed/McCourty or Elam/McCourty. Another route would be Kenny Phillips/McCourty, depending on his asking price.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
I know its the longest shot in the world in the NFL, so you dont have to comment with how its not going to happen
But if NE had Revis, Reed and Talib, would the nfl even hold a season next year or just ship the trophy to the pats?
__________________ "The people who are claiming that the Pats are dead are the same ones who would go up and check if Jason Voorhees is "really" dead by leaning over his body." -Someone at jetnation.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer
Donde esta McCourty in this scenario?
On the broader point, I agree: I wouldn't mind Reed/McCourty or Elam/McCourty. Another route would be Kenny Phillips/McCourty, depending on his asking price.
I listed McCourty in the final sentence of my last post. I just think the first scenario would be great. You finally have a pass defense that is capable of de-cleating receivers over the middle of the field while excelling in press man with two safeties that are exceptional in run support as well (something McCourty lacks in IMO). But, if not Reed, I would gladly take McCourty starting back there as well. His range is great.
The issue that I have with Phillips is that I think this secondary is in sore need of a hitter in the mold of Ryan Clark or Bernard Pollard. That isn't Phillips. He would simply be another finesse safety that we would have to pay.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
I listed McCourty in the final sentence of my last post. I just think the first scenario would be great. You finally have a pass defense that is capable of de-cleating receivers over the middle of the field while excelling in press man with two safeties that are exceptional in run support as well (something McCourty lacks in IMO). But, if not Reed, I would gladly take McCourty starting back there as well. His range is great.
I understand. I just think it's unlikely that BB will expend resources to relegate McCourty to the bench. Seems like there are at least half a dozen starting defenders from this year's team who would/should be targeted for demotion before DMac.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackBauer
I understand. I just think it's unlikely that BB will expend resources to relegate McCourty to the bench. Seems like there are at least half a dozen starting defenders from this year's team who would/should be targeted for demotion before DMac.
I'm not advocating getting rid of McCourty. With BB's preference for depth, he would still see the field a good bit depending on situation/whether or not Reed would need a breather.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Reed could 'definitely' see himself playing for BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN
I'm not advocating getting rid of McCourty. With BB's preference for depth, he would still see the field a good bit depending on situation/whether or not Reed would need a breather.
True, but you are expending cap dollars + a first round pick when you already have a first rounder + second rounder already at the position. I fully support one of the following: drafting Elam/signing Reed/signing Phillips. But I think after that all your other resources have to go into DT/WR/OL/DE/OLB.