Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory - Page 18 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree173Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2013, 11:49 AM   #171
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperWilliamsBrothers View Post
There was incriminating evidence on those tapes. Face the facts. If there wasn't, the patriots wouldn't have lost a draft pick and belichick wouldn't have had that huge fine levied against him.
Since spygate the patriots have been an average playoff team and obviously haven't won it in nine years. As much as it gets you guys up in arms, these are facts. Three superbowls decided by a total of 9 points? Please try to explain to me how in games that were that close, the taped signals had no effect on the outcome at all. Tell me that with 100% certainty. I bet you can't.
Because if the tapes made that much of a difference, NE would have won by 3 touchdowns or more. There you go, Spybaby (love that term, by the way.)
Jackson 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-02-2013, 11:51 AM   #172
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperWilliamsBrothers View Post
There was incriminating evidence on those tapes. Face the facts. If there wasn't, the patriots wouldn't have lost a draft pick and belichick wouldn't have had that huge fine levied against him.
Since spygate the patriots have been an average playoff team and obviously haven't won it in nine years. As much as it gets you guys up in arms, these are facts. Three superbowls decided by a total of 9 points? Please try to explain to me how in games that were that close, the taped signals had no effect on the outcome at all. Tell me that with 100% certainty. I bet you can't.
Name me a team that has played as many playoff games since 2001 and has a better record. I bet you can't.
Jackson 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 11:53 AM   #173
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,641
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by the Patriot View Post
Now I know you're trolling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperWilliamsBrothers View Post
There was incriminating evidence on those tapes. Face the facts. If there wasn't, the patriots wouldn't have lost a draft pick and belichick wouldn't have had that huge fine levied against him.
Since spygate the patriots have been an average playoff team and obviously haven't won it in nine years. As much as it gets you guys up in arms, these are facts. Three superbowls decided by a total of 9 points? Please try to explain to me how in games that were that close, the taped signals had no effect on the outcome at all. Tell me that with 100% certainty. I bet you can't.
.... and another troll comes up from under the bridge....
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 11:57 AM   #174
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
.... and another troll comes up from under the bridge....
Yet not one of you has refuted anything I said in my post... Strange...
SuperWilliamsBrothers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:04 PM   #175
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperWilliamsBrothers View Post
Yet not one of you has refuted anything I said in my post... Strange...
Look up a few posts.
Jackson 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:04 PM   #176
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,641
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperWilliamsBrothers View Post
Yet not one of you has refuted anything I said in my post... Strange...
You made claims of fact which aren't fact, but are either your foolish opinion or just a weak attempt to troll. You made accusations which you cannot prove, and which run counter to the known evidence. Exactly what should we bother refuting in your post that hasn't already been dealt with? Also, why should we do it? Just so you can get your troll jollies?

No thanks. I'll just add you to the ignore list now and get it over with.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:10 PM   #177
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson 2 View Post
Look up a few posts.
still waiting. I'll check back in a while.
Jackson 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:37 PM   #178
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackson 2 View Post
still waiting. I'll check back in a while.
How about we start with 2007, where the Patriots were caught cheating.

Since then the Pats have an outstanding 5-5 playoff record. Off the top of my head, I can tell you that the Giants have AT LEAST 8 playoff wins in that same time period and the ravens have nine. Both with better records than the patriots, and I'm sure there are more if you'd like me to do some actual research.

Patriots have been average since they were caught cheating. These are facts and not opinions people!
SuperWilliamsBrothers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:41 PM   #179
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deus Irae View Post
You made claims of fact which aren't fact, but are either your foolish opinion or just a weak attempt to troll. You made accusations which you cannot prove, and which run counter to the known evidence. Exactly what should we bother refuting in your post that hasn't already been dealt with? Also, why should we do it? Just so you can get your troll jollies?

No thanks. I'll just add you to the ignore list now and get it over with.

Nothing I said in my post was untrue, and the only accusation I made was that none of you can tell me with a straight face that you don't think spygate could've given you an edge in those 3 (three point margin) superbowls, where any small advantage could've decided the games.



And none of you have.
SuperWilliamsBrothers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:45 PM   #180
PatsFans.com Supporter
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperWilliamsBrothers View Post
How about we start with 2007, where the Patriots were caught cheating.

Since then the Pats have an outstanding 5-5 playoff record. Off the top of my head, I can tell you that the Giants have AT LEAST 8 playoff wins in that same time period and the ravens have nine. Both with better records than the patriots, and I'm sure there are more if you'd like me to do some actual research.

Patriots have been average since they were caught cheating. These are facts and not opinions people!
Sorry, the Giants haven't played as many playoff games since 2006 as NE. Wrong again.
Jackson 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Curran: Jets won't ruin this Super Bowl party SVN PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 1 01-24-2011 04:46 PM
Marshall FaulK: New England v. New Orleans in Super Bowl QB12 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 58 01-09-2011 12:03 AM
Holy Moly: Marshall Faulk Predicts Pats/Giants Super Bowl QB12 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 17 09-10-2009 03:57 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC