Curran: Marshall Faulk not over being cheated out of Super Bowl victory - Page 16 - New England Patriots Forums

Palm Beach Pats Fan · 02-01-2013, 08:24 PM

Mr. Uncle Little Meat:

Tell me all of the facts that you know about the allegation of taping a Rams Super Bowl practice, which, for the 568th time, was a charge separate from (and even 5 months after) the spygate controversy.

Faulk's compliant has ONLY to do with the allegation of taping a Rams Super Bowl practice.

You do not understand this simple fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Little Meat

... so Faulk is a dip**** for questioning the integrity of the Patriots or whatever else.

You do not even know what Faulk was talking about.
You do not even understand what this thread is about.
You stare blankly at your screen and say "but my amp goes to 11"

Your response, as always:
:crickets chirping:

Uncle Meat · 02-01-2013, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah

DidI say 2 wrongs made a right? No, I did not.
I said that BB defied the commissioner's memo on camera placement openly.

I also said that "suspected" was inaccurate. The Patriots admitted to the taping. They were not suspected of taping.

You cannot respond to the facts posted, instead choosing to spin off in straw man arguments.

Bull-pucky.

You said this:

Quote:

They, the Jets and others were taping. That is a fact.

Tell me why you said that. Honestly, tell me why. If you can come up with a reason that doesn't jibe with what I said about "two wrongs making a right," then I'll apologize. I don't think you can even invent something, though...but go ahead, I have an open mind.

Then tell me how others speculating about the Patriots' practices are wrong are misguided. You "heard things" and that's good enough for you? Other people don't "hear things" as well? They cheated, got caught, and what you have as a result is what you see here.

Also, why would you say "The Patriots admitted to the taping. They were not suspected of taping?" What is the discrepancy here? They DID tape, and they DID break the rules in doing so. This was against the rules. Is that much clear? Can we agree on that?

Quote:

You cannot respond to the facts posted, instead choosing to spin off in straw man arguments.

Let's please don't be ridiculous. You just brought up that other people were doing it too for giggles?

I'll say it again: if anybody wants to talk about what's only proven then they shouldn't talk about things that aren't proven to justify the Patriots breaking of the rules. Again, that's because nobody else has been found guilty of the same thing.

So, again, don't talk about what ISN'T proven as though it is as well. The Patriots were punished for a reason, and there are enough holes in the officially story for people to be left unconvinced about many, many things. That is why you hear these opinion about reputable football personalities questioning the integrity of the process.

Don't blame me, I'm just trying to explain it to you...you, who do not wish to listen.

Uncle Meat · 02-01-2013, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Palm Beach Pats Fan

Mr. Uncle Little Meat:

Tell me all of the facts that you know about the allegation of taping a Rams Super Bowl practice, which, for the 568th time, was a charge separate from (and even 5 months after) the spygate controversy.

Faulk's compliant has ONLY to do with the allegation of taping a Rams Super Bowl practice.

You do not understand this simple fact.

You do not even know what Faulk was talking about.
You do not even understand what this thread is about.
You stare blankly at your screen and say "but my amp goes to 11"

Your response, as always:
:crickets chirping:

Oh, but I do know these things about Walsh and the allegations about the taping of the walk-through.

What YOU don't know is what I'M talking about.

***BradyFTW!*** · 02-01-2013, 09:23 PM

FFS people, stop feeding the troll. Uncle Meat was an idiot when he showed up 3+ years ago, and time hasn't done him any favors. I honestly wish for his sake that he was a troll, but I'm fairly convinced that he's just a low-functioning human being. Resist the urge to rubberneck and just ignore him.

Palm Beach Pats Fan · 02-01-2013, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Meat

Oh, but I do know these things about Walsh and the allegations about the taping of the walk-through.

Walsh made no allegations of taping a walkthrough
Walsh denied that he ever taped a walkthrough,
he said that nobody taped a walkthrough, and
the Herald said it didn't happen.

I'm trying to stay on topic here. You keep bringing up spygate, which has NOTHING to do with this topic, and you have PROVEN your abject ignorance of FACTS

***Jackson 2*** · 02-01-2013, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Meat

Oh, but I do know these things about Walsh and the allegations about the taping of the walk-through.

What YOU don't know is what I'M talking about.

I've read every one of your posts in this thread and I only have one question (and I seriously mean this without trying to be a wise-ass): What time did you start drinking this morning?

***PatsWickedPissah*** · 02-01-2013, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Meat

Bull-pucky.

You said this:

Tell me why you said that. Honestly, tell me why. If you can come up with a reason that doesn't jibe with what I said about "two wrongs making a right," then I'll apologize. I don't think you can even invent something, though...but go ahead, I have an open mind.

Then tell me how others speculating about the Patriots' practices are wrong are misguided. You "heard things" and that's good enough for you? Other people don't "hear things" as well? They cheated, got caught, and what you have as a result is what you see here.

Also, why would you say "The Patriots admitted to the taping. They were not suspected of taping?" What is the discrepancy here? They DID tape, and they DID break the rules in doing so. This was against the rules. Is that much clear? Can we agree on that?

Let's please don't be ridiculous. You just brought up that other people were doing it too for giggles?

I'll say it again: if anybody wants to talk about what's only proven then they shouldn't talk about things that aren't proven to justify the Patriots breaking of the rules. Again, that's because nobody else has been found guilty of the same thing.

So, again, don't talk about what ISN'T proven as though it is as well. The Patriots were punished for a reason, and there are enough holes in the officially story for people to be left unconvinced about many, many things. That is why you hear these opinion about reputable football personalities questioning the integrity of the process.

Don't blame me, I'm just trying to explain it to you...you, who do not wish to listen.

Read my post. Slowly. You'll see I provided the context as to why Goodell issued the ~2006 memo to the league. I also went on to explain why the Patriots were punished for their violation of the commissioner's rules concerning camera placement.

I apologize if English is not your native tongue but I am not that fluent in others. Trollish is my worst.

Uncle Meat · 02-01-2013, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackson 2

I've read every one of your posts in this thread and I only have one question (and I seriously mean this without trying to be a wise-ass): What time did you start drinking this morning?

Well, my mom didn't wake me up until about 3 PM....

No, seriously, why would somebody want to sift through 15 pages of this pure garbage?

I do have a point, which I've been trying to impart. I've said it many times. Seeing is how you read all my posts (which I'm flattered by), can you tell me what my main point is?

I'll give you a hint: the Patriots broke the rules, and whatever the backlash is by way of opinion, they brought upon themselves. It should comes as no surprise.

Uncle Meat · 02-01-2013, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWickedPissah

Read my post. Slowly. You'll see I provided the context as to why Goodell issued the ~2006 memo to the league. I also went on to explain why the Patriots were punished for their violation of the commissioner's rules concerning camera placement.

I apologize if English is not your native tongue but I am not that fluent in others. Trollish is my worst.

Explain to me again why you said that the Jets did it too...I'm dumb and missed that part.

Glad to see that you admit that it was a rule prior to the memo though.

Palm Beach Pats Fan · 02-01-2013, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Meat

can you tell me what my main point is?

you have none

Quote:

the Patriots broke the rules

No, they did not ever tape a walkthrough, as Faulk believes. No reporter or source claims that they did.

You continue to bring up spygate, an earlier, different controversy, unrelated to this discussion or to Faulk's allegation in any way.

You simply cannot comprehend this. It is like a cow watching a train go by, to you, just a blank and vacuous stare on your part. Total lack of brain activity. Flat-lined. Jets fans are Mensa members by comparison.