Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2013, 05:37 AM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

Nice overview and commentary. Pending FA and even if we resign our top 5 impending FA (Welker, Vollmer, Talib, Woodhead and Edelman) WR is clearly the thinnest position on the roster. Followed by CB. The franchise tag #'s for the 3 we might consider tagging one of are Welker $11.4M. Vollmer $9.66M and Talib $10.66M.

The Patriots have 54 players signed including futures contracts (which are essentially invites to train and participate in off season activities) with an off season roster limit of 80. Cap wise the team is projected to have roughly $18M+ in available cap space prior to any cuts, restructures or extensions. A Brady extension would potentially free up at least several million more. Restructures for Mankins and/or a possible extension for Wilfork would potentially free up another $5M or so. Fells could be cut with a cap savings of almost a million, but that would likely go towards a tender or extension for Hooman who is a RFA. An original round tender for Hooman who was drafted in the 5th would be $1.33M. So we have the potential to create upwards of $30M in cap space.

Resetting roster and free agents - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-22-2013, 07:03 AM   #2
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
bagwell368's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NWW of Boston
Posts: 675
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

Not bad, but a serious underselling of the need for another DT/NT that will be at least 3rd on the depth chart. Love getting banged up in the game showed the weakness in our depth. Wilfork would be more effective if he had another 10 plays a game on the bench too.
bagwell368 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 07:14 AM   #3
Thread Ignore Champion
 
ausbacker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,939
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

When you see the roster broken down as such you realise how many holes there still are to fill, especially on D before it's a consistently good unit.

It must be a sobering experience for other teams when I can see that many needs on the Patriots given the state of other rosters.
ausbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 07:31 AM   #4
All Pro Poster
 
upstater1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,792
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

There's a chance they actually tag Vollmer even though that's a huge chunk of money. He probably needs to show he can do this for at least one year without any issues. Not sure he's in line for a long-term contract, even though he played great this year. Remember, he often took on the opposition's best pass rushing threat this year.
upstater1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 07:31 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

Field Yates also restating/updating the Patriots picks in the April 25th draft:

Quote:
As part of our look into what the offseason has in store for the Patriots, here is a refresher on the team's round-by-round selections in the upcoming NFL draft, which begins April 25.

First round: Own (29th overall)
Second round: Own
Third round: Own
Fourth round: None (pick sent to Tampa Bay in Aqib Talib trade)
Fifth round: None (pick sent to Washington in Albert Haynesworth trade)
Sixth round: None (pick sent to Cincinnati in Chad Johnson trade)
Seventh round: Own, Tampa Bay's (pick acquired in Aqib Talib trade)

That leaves the Patriots with just five selections entering the proceedings, a low number compared to how the team has normally stocked up under Bill Belichick. Draft day trades are common, opening the door for the Patriots to acquire more picks.
And a few dates to keep in mind for FA. Franchise tags can begin to be applied on February 18th and must be applied no later than March 4th. FA commences on March 12th and all RFA tenders must be executed by 4PM. However under new rules supposed to eliviate tampering all teams can legally enter discussions with any other teams impending UFA in a 3 day window commencing on March 9th, although actual contracts cannot be signed until the 12th.
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 08:16 AM   #6
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
IllegalContact's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,616
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

for 2013:
QB: same
RB: woodhead gone......add demps
OL: bring back vollmer......add a decent prospect for competition
TE: hernandez, gronk, ballard, and either hooman or a hernandez-type prospect
WR: complete overhaul just like 2007 the idea is to reverse the trend of reception consolidation.....
DT: need a blue-chip here to take some heat off of wilfork......everybody else here are depth players.....none of them are deserved starters.
DE: pats are set......scott is gone.....jones,francis,bequette will be improved in their 2nd years
LB: time to add a decent MLB prospect.....spikes is in his last year of his rookie deal, and I'm not sure he's long for the spot in this defense.....the pats need to get faster in that spot
CB: Dennard is one starter....hopefullt talib is the other......if they're going to stay small at S, then I would like to see a prospect added with some size and strength to interrupt at the LOS.....the pats need to do more press coverage
S: depending on how CB plays out, but a guy like laron landry would be nice......its getting old watching this group try to hit people, only to hurt themselves........need to put something into the backs of the minds of the pass recievers

in principle, use draft for DT,ILB,OL,CB, use FA for WR and S
__________________
“ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
IllegalContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 08:18 AM   #7
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
IllegalContact's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,616
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

question: can the pats trade ballard?
__________________
“ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
IllegalContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 08:49 AM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
Snake Eyes's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,373
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

Quote:
Originally Posted by IllegalContact View Post
question: can the pats trade ballard?
Why would you want to? He's very low cost with high potential. No team is going to give much of anything for him because he's banged up, it makes more sense to keep him and see what he can do.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Snake Eyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 08:54 AM   #9
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
IllegalContact's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,616
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

as of right now, my draft looks like this:

round 1: Jesse Williams DT.......this guy has played 5-tech DE as well as NG....he is used as an interior rusher in the passing game as well as FB in short yardage........former rugby player....typical aussie madman
round 2: move down with the hope of getting a 3 and a 4
round 3a: TE Jordan Reed....the next aaron hernandez......literally......this would give us 2 of each type of TE (gronk,ballard,hernandez,reed)
round 3b: ILB Nico Johnson......decent size, fast, and crimson tough
round 4: WR ryan swope.....because he fits and is proven.
round 7a: OT reid fragel....project that seems worth it
round 7b: whoever drops in the draft because they got in a bar fight
__________________
“ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
IllegalContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 08:57 AM   #10
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
IllegalContact's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,616
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Rodak: Resetting the 2013 roster and FA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Eyes View Post
Why would you want to? He's very low cost with high potential. No team is going to give much of anything for him because he's banged up, it makes more sense to keep him and see what he can do.
not because I want to, just from an asset standpoint......figuring that there's only so many offensive plays in a given season that maybe he's overkill and if he can garner a good return in the form of a decent draft pick, then you can turn that into whatever you want.....Not looking to trade him.....but if there's something you really want, he could be the means to get it
__________________
“ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
IllegalContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roster Projections: Reiss, Rodak, Yates Unanimous: No Fullbacks make it Ian PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 31 08-20-2012 12:13 PM
How big does Mike Rodak think the Patriots' roster will be? Fencer PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 30 07-19-2012 05:15 PM
Rodak: PS eligible players on the roster including recent cuts MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 08-30-2011 07:59 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563