The dual problem with letting Welker go - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree16Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2013, 11:23 PM   #1
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,684
My Mood: Grumpy
Default The dual problem with letting Welker go

For those saying that the Patriots should let Welker walk, there's two things that need to be kept in mind:

(1) The Patriots would have to replace his production—and, given his affinity with Brady, that's not an easy thing. As we've seen, a lot of receivers flame out in this offense.

I'm not arguing that it can't be done, but it's certainly not a given.

(2) Welker will almost certainly end up with a contending team. As a case in point, the Colts have over $40M in cap room. Even Denver has almost $20M. I don't want to see Welker become the anti-Woodhead.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-20-2013, 11:38 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,073
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

I think I've finally "seen the light" on why the Patriots are hesitant to re-sign Welker. For the record, I think Wes is an amazing player and one of my favorite Patriots of all-time. And it has nothing to do with his "drops", which frankly, are overstated. He catches a lot of very difficult passes and has lots of targets, so I don't really think he's prone to a lot of drops overall, and I think that his "anti-clutch" stuff is bs. He's made a ton of huge plays in big games; everyone just focuses on a couple of key drops.

But the reason why maybe it's time for Welker to go is because he overlaps so much with Hernandez' strengths that I wonder if he's worth a big contract. I often see both Hernandez and Welker open on the same play, but in games like tonight, neither one of them really broke the Ravens defense with their short route running. If the Pats could go out and get a proven player like Greg Jennings for, say, $8-9M per year, then that would make the offense better. You'd have a true number one receiver on the outside, a guy who can run all the routes, has decent size, and can go deep.

I think a receiving corps of Jennings (or someone like Wallace), Hernandez, Gronkowski, and Lloyd is much more effective than the current one. You have the field covered at all levels, which makes it so much more difficult to stop.
Ice_Ice_Brady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:39 PM   #3
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
IllegalContact's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,030
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
For those saying that the Patriots should let Welker walk, there's two things that need to be kept in mind:

(1) The Patriots would have to replace his production—and, given his affinity with Brady, that's not an easy thing. As we've seen, a lot of receivers flame out in this offense.

I'm not arguing that it can't be done, but it's certainly not a given.

(2) Welker will almost certainly end up with a contending team. As a case in point, the Colts have over $40M in cap room. Even Denver has almost $20M. I don't want to see Welker become the anti-Woodhead.
I don't know........after the 2006 season (in which the pats were a bit close in getting to the SB), the pats had no problem flipping their WR roster......maybe its time to do it again......
__________________
“ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
IllegalContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:43 PM   #4
Rookie
 
The Beast's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

Welker isn't a loss that the Patriots can't overcome. I love Wes and what he has done for us these past 6 years but if he wants big money then I say no, as we can use for stuff that we need help on and with Brady, Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd, possibly another WR via draft or FA and McDaniels we will be fine without him.
The Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:45 PM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,938
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

1. That's my main worry. If he's healthy, then I know Hernandez can take an increased role. Big if, though. Edelman is another guy that could definitely pick up some snaps in Welker's role, but he also lacks Welker's durability. Ideally they'll re-sign Edelman, but they definitely need to do more than that, whether it's a trade for Harvin, signing Hartline, a draft pick (my top three options), or something else.

2. The Colts would actually scare me less with Welker. It'd mean that they're taking one of their ridiculously explosive options off the field. And Peyton would get Welker killed so fast. Welker's good at avoiding hits, but Brady is also fantastic at not getting his WRs killed. Peyton, not so much. There can't be too many other good teams that can afford him.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Sciz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:45 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
MoLewisrocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 19,949
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

Quote:
Originally Posted by IllegalContact View Post
I don't know........after the 2006 season (in which the pats were a bit close in getting to the SB), the pats had no problem flipping their WR roster......maybe its time to do it again......
How'd that work out in the end...
MoLewisrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:49 PM   #7
Brady to Dobson
 
Brady_to_Moss's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blackjack table at Foxwoods
Posts: 12,011
My Mood: Cool
Send a message via AIM to Brady_to_Moss
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

Quote:
Originally Posted by IllegalContact View Post
I don't know........after the 2006 season (in which the pats were a bit close in getting to the SB), the pats had no problem flipping their WR roster......maybe its time to do it again......
they don't need to flip their WR roster. lloyd, edelman and welker are great for this roster. Get a burner now. A greg jennings or harvin type player now
Brady_to_Moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:52 PM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
DocHoliday's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,130
My Mood: Aggressive
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

No Jennings. No more retreads.

Get a Wallace to blow the top off or draft someone.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

The Patriots have been overachievers the past two years. It doesn't have the talent to compensate for injuries, and it wins so much because it puts in 99% effort in the regular season and plays with terrific schemes to mask its deficiencies.

But in the playoffs a good team at 99% will not beat emotional, talented teams that play at 100%. It's what happened against the Giants in 2011 and the Ravens in 2012.
DocHoliday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:52 PM   #9
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,684
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

Quote:
Originally Posted by IllegalContact View Post
I don't know........after the 2006 season (in which the pats were a bit close in getting to the SB), the pats had no problem flipping their WR roster......maybe its time to do it again......
I don't think 2006 is the best comparison here.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:54 PM   #10
Brady to Dobson
 
Brady_to_Moss's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blackjack table at Foxwoods
Posts: 12,011
My Mood: Cool
Send a message via AIM to Brady_to_Moss
Default Re: The dual problem with letting Welker go

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocHoliday View Post
No Jennings. No more retreads.

Get a Wallace to blow the top off or draft someone.
Drafting a WR is like going out fishing..you have no idea what you will catch and how they will respond to your system..look at chad jackson..we all thought he would be the next moss and a burner..
Brady_to_Moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Letting Givens and Branch go - See they told you it would be no problem!!! PATRIOT64 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 35 03-03-2007 10:53 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC